Started By
Message

re: How can people think city > country?

Posted on 2/19/16 at 7:10 pm to
Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
56710 posts
Posted on 2/19/16 at 7:10 pm to
Figured someone would say that. I mean in terms of percentage relative to the area's population, if that's better.
Posted by Easy
Los Angeles
Member since Dec 2008
5837 posts
Posted on 2/19/16 at 7:22 pm to
It's been said that suburbs are places invented by women to raise children. I'd have to agree with that.

Personally I love living in cities. And I mean NYC, SF, DC, and even LA type cities. I might move to the country when I retire but it'd be in the north not the south.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 2/19/16 at 7:35 pm to
quote:

Figured someone would say that. I mean in terms of percentage relative to the area's population, if that's better.
. General statements are usually wrong. I'd say Napa is quite different than rural West Virginia.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
92357 posts
Posted on 2/19/16 at 7:36 pm to
quote:

How can people think city > country?

Females in cities >>>>>>>>> females in the country

I live in St. Pete and LOVE it. I walk everywhere. The food here is fantastic. Restaurants and bars everywhere. Rays, Bucs, and Lightning. Theme parks everywhere. Beaches everywhere. Golf everywhere. Fishing everywhere. Art and museums everywhere.

So many options for outdoor activities that it's hard to choose what to do. I don't know why I'd need acres of land in the middle of nowhere to enjoy what comes with living there. I get enough of that when I visit my family...who all live in cabins in Mississippi or Alabama.
This post was edited on 2/19/16 at 7:53 pm
Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
56710 posts
Posted on 2/19/16 at 7:48 pm to
I'd venture to say Napa is unlike any other rural place in the US.

Nice outlier though.
This post was edited on 2/19/16 at 7:52 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 2/19/16 at 8:02 pm to
Rural areas have changed, particularly out west. You have to be fairly successful in order to live that lifestyle.
Posted by Lago Tiger
Lago Vista Tx
Member since Jan 2011
1069 posts
Posted on 2/19/16 at 8:03 pm to
I live in the country outside Austin . I wouldn't give up my Lake Travis Hill country views to look at someones privacy fence for anything . At anytime I can see herds of deer, wild Turkey and other wildlife . I can be on the Lake in 10 minutes anchored in our favorite cove ,sipping on a cold one . Don't have to deal with the congestion or traffic .
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
61791 posts
Posted on 2/19/16 at 8:07 pm to
Just to follow up from my earlier post... I want either city or real country. Fck the suburbs and kill me before I live in most of the country area of La.
Posted by Tigerlaff
FIGHTING out of the Carencro Sonic
Member since Jan 2010
23190 posts
Posted on 2/19/16 at 8:09 pm to
This debate is literally as old as the agricultural revolution.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
92357 posts
Posted on 2/19/16 at 8:11 pm to
quote:

I want either city or real country. Fck the suburbs
I agree. I could easily deal with a small beach town as well.
Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
15406 posts
Posted on 2/21/16 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

quote:

most suburbs are the worse the of both


Not from my experience. Most are just an extension of the city with less traffic.



The suburbs of Los Angeles are exactly that, just the outer limits of the city, with most of the conveniences and less traffic.
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
32887 posts
Posted on 2/21/16 at 4:04 pm to
People like what they want.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 9Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram