Started By
Message

re: House passes vote for new stimulus relief bill

Posted on 3/10/21 at 3:28 pm to
Posted by mmmmmbeeer
ATL
Member since Nov 2014
7443 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

bullshite



Ya might want to read that whole article, bud.
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
16549 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

Ya might want to read that whole article, bud.


I did sport. Why don't you point out what you don't like about it
Posted by mmmmmbeeer
ATL
Member since Nov 2014
7443 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

I did sport. Why don't you point out what you don't like about it


“The parts of the Trump tax cuts that really benefit the rich are not the personal-income-tax cuts but the corporate-income-tax cuts and estate-tax cuts,” according to Wamhoff. Rule changes surrounding corporate taxes, “which mainly benefit the (mostly rich) people who own corporate stocks, and the estate-tax cuts, are the parts of the law that made it a good deal for the rich,” Wamhoff said.

Among other noteworthy provisions, the tax cuts reduced the corporate-income-tax rate to 21% from 35%. It also raised the exemption before an estate tax kicked in, going from $5.4 million to $11.4 million.

He added: “No one ever said that low- or middle-income people would get no benefits from the Trump tax law. What ITEP and others pointed out from the beginning was that the rich would get a disproportionate share of the benefits of the law and nothing in this data conflicts with that.”
Posted by Cracker
in a box
Member since Nov 2009
17764 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 3:37 pm to
Do they ask him to sign the bill or will madam secretary just yell “make your mark boy” and a helper grabs his elbow and makes it work
Posted by BoogaBear
Member since Jul 2013
5611 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 3:37 pm to
My AGI misses by 800 bucks. Awesome.
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
16549 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 3:38 pm to
Yet here is what you said

quote:

It let's about 5% of the richest in the country keep more of their own money.


All of this says you were speaking out of your arse

quote:

• Americans had $1.552 trillion in tax liabilities last year, compared with $1.619 trillion in total tax liabilities at the same point a year prior. That’s a drop of 4% on a year-over-year basis.

• The double-digit percentage decreases in average tax liability started with a 12.5% drop for people making $15,000 to $20,000 a year. Double-digit percentage reductions in liability continued for people making $25,000 to $30,000 (down 11.2%) through $100,000 to $200,000 (down 10.96%).

• Taxpayers making between $40,000 and $50,000 a year had the largest fall in average tax liability, a 14.5% drop, while high-end households making between $250,000 and $500,000 had the second largest decrease, with a 14.4% liability reduction.

• Taxpayers making at least $1 million had a 4.3% decrease in average tax liability.


What you posted does nothing to refute that
Posted by cyarrr
Prairieville
Member since Jun 2017
3373 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

If you are middle aged, married, both people have a good education and work full time, there is not much excuse why a couple wouldn’t earn under 160,000$



Because it's based on AGI, it's a lot more than 160k, probably closer to 200K unless that middle aged couple has a terrible CPA.
This post was edited on 3/10/21 at 3:42 pm
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43394 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

which mainly benefit the (mostly rich) people who own corporate stocks


Every single person with a 401k, 403b, or IRA own corporate stocks you fricking moron.
Posted by mmmmmbeeer
ATL
Member since Nov 2014
7443 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

Every single person with a 401k, 403b, or IRA own corporate stocks you fricking moron.


It's a matter of scale, you fricking parrot. Regressive taxes. Learn about them.
Posted by tgrgrd00
Kenner, LA
Member since Jun 2004
8570 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

It's a matter of scale, you fricking parrot. Regressive taxes. Learn about them.


You are the parrot. You repeat the bullshite media talking points and call others parrot's.

Gah, so frustrating you dumb arse morons.

Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
16549 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

It's a matter of scale, you fricking parrot. Regressive taxes. Learn about them.


Let's get back to only 5% of people keeping more of their own money. Why don't you show us where that is true
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

Because it's based on AGI, it's a lot more than 160k, probably closer to 200K unless that middle aged couple has a terrible CPA.



There are very few people getting above the line, $40k deductions. Itemized and Standard deduction reduce AGI to taxable income.
Posted by BoogaBear
Member since Jul 2013
5611 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 3:50 pm to
Yes my taxable is well below, but AGI is above.
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
29016 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

20+ downvotes for a stimulus that actually addresses the needs of the people but the same post for the Trump tax cuts, which resulted in peanuts for 95% of Americans, received mass upvotes. Funny shite.



Trump tax cuts equated to $800 a month less i payed in taxes for the better part of 3 years.

800*12*3= 28,800
1400*4 (dependents)= 5,600

Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261685 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

It let's about 5% of the richest in the country keep more of their own money.
]

fricking retarded commies still stuck on this fake class warfare

You probably still think a rich man's wealth keeps a poor man from eating.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
47832 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

If you are middle aged, married, both people have a good education and work full time, there is not much excuse why a couple wouldn’t earn under 160,000$



really?
Posted by cardswinagain
Member since Jun 2013
11906 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 4:00 pm to
This bill is nothing but a Liberal's wet dream
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32741 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

I don;t think this is true. You won't get it initially, but the payment is an advance credit on your 2021 tax return. So you would still get it, but not until you filed your taxes next year.
I don't know why you're getting downvotes, this is exactly how the previous stimuli worked, so I'm assuming that they are doing that again.
Posted by ElRoos
Member since Nov 2017
7227 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 4:16 pm to
Finna get our stamina cheq !
Posted by jclem11
Neoliberal Shill
Member since Nov 2011
7846 posts
Posted on 3/10/21 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

That excludes families that earn over $160,000/year.

And $160,000 ain't exactly rich these days.


lolwut? Surely you jest.

$160K is at least the 90th percentile in income m'dude.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram