Started By
Message

re: History buffs, how different would the world be today if Kennedy was never assassinated?

Posted on 4/20/22 at 10:26 am to
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
175849 posts
Posted on 4/20/22 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Read Stephen King's 11/22/63 for a look.

Stephen King is a leftist loon
Posted by I-59 Tiger
Vestavia Hills, AL
Member since Sep 2003
36841 posts
Posted on 4/20/22 at 10:28 am to
quote:

3. There is strong evidence Nixon sabotaged Vietnam peace talks during his 68 campaign.


Based on what? Nixon didn't really become the GOP frontrunner until the fall of '67. LBJ said he woudln't run again in late March. How did Nixon sabotage Vietnam peace talks?
Posted by BRich
Old Metairie
Member since Aug 2017
2759 posts
Posted on 4/20/22 at 10:30 am to
quote:

Civil Rights still occurs as is, thus political parties will still reverse themselves


Not "as is"; it happens quite a bit later than 1964 (civil rights act) and 1965 (voting rights act).

Number one, Kennedy as a "Yankee northerner" advocating for a civil rights bill gets even more pushback by his southern Democrat colleagues, more than it did for Texan Lyndon B. Johnson (who did get a lot of pushback from those Democrats anyway). He likely would not have introduced it until his second "lame duck" term.

Number two, Kennedy's assassination created a "martyrdom" which enabled Johnson to pass that bill in Kennedy's name not even a year after Kennedy's death. Without that death and martyrdom, opponents fight a lot harder and the Civil Rights Act and Voting Rights Act are passed much later, and probably not in the same language that they are today.

I would hope that the Voting Rights Act in particular is not written and and interpreted in such a way to DICTATE the gerrymandering of "majority minority" districts to the degree that it is now.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
39064 posts
Posted on 4/20/22 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Agree with most, but one does have to credit Kennedy's handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Very deftly balanced warhawks ready to destroy human civilization and peaceniks who would allow the Soviets an upper hand. He learned from his earlier failures (Bay of Pigs, Austria Summit) and applied his lessons. Something to be said for that, and for stopping nuclear Armageddon without cowtowing to the enemy.


We'll agree to disagree on this. JFK didn't exactly stare down Kruschev until he blinked so much as cut a deal. You get out of Cuba, we'll get out of Turkey. But the Joe Kennedy PR machine went to work and the public perception of the Cuban Missile Crisis was etched in stone (pretty much the way all of JFK's image had been created by Papa Joe - PT109, Profiles in Courage, Why England Slept, etc). Almost the entirety of the Kennedy mythos is a sham.
Posted by lepdagod
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
5509 posts
Posted on 4/20/22 at 10:59 am to
quote:

The higher likelihood is that JFK escalates Vietnam, esp since he was the one who already escalated it to begin with. Domestic policies would be similar to LBJ, just with a nicer smile attached.


I don’t know about … LBJ personally escalated the Vietnam War… that was his decision… their policies domestically don’t mirror each other at all… LBJ really drove home the Civil Rights Act… JFK made NO attempt to address the situation …
Posted by lepdagod
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
5509 posts
Posted on 4/20/22 at 11:01 am to
quote:

I doubt there's a Nixon presidency as early.. which probably would mean no Reagan era until maybe a few years later if at all.


Correct … Nixon, Ford, Carter or Reagan become President… LBJ would still have his turn
Posted by lepdagod
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
5509 posts
Posted on 4/20/22 at 11:02 am to
quote:

You get out of Cuba, we'll get out of Turkey.


Really not that simple…
Did we leave Turkey???
Posted by tonydtigr
Beautiful Downtown Glenn Springs,Tx
Member since Nov 2011
6434 posts
Posted on 4/20/22 at 11:10 am to
quote:

Stephen King is a leftist loon


Yeah it was tough to get past all the slobbering over Hillary that he did in parts of that book.
Posted by ZenFNmaster
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2007
2828 posts
Posted on 4/20/22 at 11:14 am to
I believe the intelligence agencies would have remained our eyes and ears, instead of dictating policy, for a much longer period of time.
That in and of itself dramatically changes the political landscape reaching perhaps even modern day.
I wonder how different the 90's would have been. Without the CIA's heavy influence, Bush senior certainly never becomes president.
Couple that with never having a Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter or Reagan Presidency's.
How much better of a country do we have without Vietnam, the War on Drugs, Trickle Down Economics, The Neo-con resurgence, etc ?
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 4/20/22 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Based on what?


Chennault Affair. Apparently the LBJ Lobrary released some tapes a few years back that included intercepts they had obtained of a South Vietnamese official speaking with Anna Chennault in the summer of 1968 while peace talks were going on. It’s been a while since I read up on it, but Henry Kissinger was also involved. If I remember right he had secretly switched parties and was feeding the Nixon campaign with peace talks progress.

It hasn’t been proven, just evidence and that evidence doesn’t trace back to Nixon himself. Chennault was leader of some Women For Nixon group and personally knew Nixon.
Posted by tigahbruh
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2014
2860 posts
Posted on 4/20/22 at 11:19 am to
quote:

Did we leave Turkey???

We took out the nukes within months as agreed with the Soviets.
Turkey was still an ally. Same with Soviets and Castro. Soviets still bankrolled Castro's activities (inc terrorist ones). Just took the nukes out of Cuba.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
39064 posts
Posted on 4/20/22 at 11:23 am to
Pulled our nukes out if Russia removed theirs from Cuber*.





*Using the JFK pronunciation
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
194652 posts
Posted on 4/20/22 at 11:38 am to
if Kennedy lives , runs a wins in 64'
Nixon most likely wins in 68'
Bobby challenges in 72' Nixon won that so big likely still does. Agnew as VP , still is Agnew and Nixon still Nixon and he's still friends with JFK
So Carter never happens, RFK wins the nomination beats Reagan in 76' RFK more liberal than Carter
so Reagan wins the rematch in 80'

the 80s still Rock,,, maybe instead of the Middle East being the hot spots its SE Asia
Don't think Eastern Europe changes that much
Posted by Jumpinjack
Member since Oct 2021
6485 posts
Posted on 4/20/22 at 11:49 am to
The Rolling Stones would have performed in Cuba a lot sooner than they did.
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
83148 posts
Posted on 4/20/22 at 12:03 pm to
I think if all depends on what Kennedy would’ve done with Vietnam. Less involvement in Vietnam would’ve altered US history drastically. Hard to overstate the effects of that stupid war.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
27525 posts
Posted on 4/20/22 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

We had a string of terrible presidents. LBJ, Nixon and then the ineffective Ford and Carter. Reagan REALLY flipped that script.


Pretty much the answer I was about to give.

Would Lyndon Johnson, one of the worst Presidents we’ve ever had, and one of the worst human being to have held that office, become President.

What follows Kennedy is Johnson, Nixon, Ford (who probably wasn’t bad but had Watergate thrown around his neck), and Jimmy Carter.

By the time we were into the 1980 Election season, their was a real feeling of despair amongst America. Ronald Reagan changed that, bringing renewed hope to the country, and in the meantime gave that real finish push towards the falling apart of the Soviet Union.

Does a Reagan Presidency happen if JFK serves his full two terms? Is there a need for a Ronald Reagan if Lyndon Johnson never happens? He and the Peanut Farmer, along with Nixon’s shadiness, really set a need for renewed confidence in America, with Reagan delivered (sorry, Obama, his Hope and Change was actually real).
This post was edited on 4/20/22 at 12:17 pm
Posted by BorrisMart
La
Member since Jul 2020
9021 posts
Posted on 4/20/22 at 12:20 pm to
JFk would have never been president if it wasn't for the mafia, and he would not have been killed had he not blundered the deal his dad made with said underworld to have him elected (or really just put a muzzle on his little brother). If JFK was not assassinated, I don't see much change except the mafia/CIA might have actually gotten rid of Castro and gotten their casinos back and it would be tropical Vegas again.

As far as a big monumental assassination, the way the country/world has consistently eroded in the morals department, there may have been another sitting president to get assassinated, but who knows.

ETA: I'd have to look it up but I think it was Johnson that Marcello, Traficante, Hoffa (Teamsters), and a lot of the other mobsters wanted to back but the order came out from the Commission and Chicago that Kennedy was the guy bc they "thought" they could control him bc of their history with his dad. They definitely backed Nixon.
This post was edited on 4/20/22 at 12:37 pm
Posted by WinnaSez
Jackson, MS
Member since Mar 2019
1299 posts
Posted on 4/20/22 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

Camelot sycophants to mythologize what was a fairly non-descript and lackluster presidency into this legend that doesn't really stand up to scrutiny. JFK was not this hugely popular leader most of the media and historians would have you believe.


You are correct - Camelot was indeed a myth. There are several accounts that JFK never even saw Camelot, much less sang and danced to the recording weekly when he was in the White House.
I read an article a while back that polled people after the assasination (I can’t remember how far the poll was removed from his death) asking who they voted for in ‘60 and JFK won by a landslide. He was way more popular dead than alive.
He went to Dallas to shore up support among Southeners bc his chances of re-election were slim.
At the Trademart luncheon he was given a cowboy hat and refused to put it on. The astute political animal in him knew he would look like an arse in that hat and that the photos could torpedo his re-election. Think Dukakis in the army tank.
Anyway. To answer the OP, The Great Society measures would not have passed under Kennedy; they only passed bc LBJ used the Kennedy myth to get them through. “It’s what Kennedy” wanted was LBJ’s mantra and with the nation’s intense mourning and the creation of the Kennedy aura Congressmen weren’t willing to vote against anything that Kennedy would have wanted.

Oh, funny thing about the hat is he said he would wear it when he got back to Washington.
This post was edited on 4/20/22 at 12:26 pm
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
120204 posts
Posted on 4/20/22 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

I am convinced, however, that the CIA killed him because he wanted to disclose things the gov't wants kept secret.



Who didn't the CIA kill in the 60s?
Posted by PowerTool
The dark side of the road
Member since Dec 2009
22883 posts
Posted on 4/20/22 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

I don't think Vietnam happens. Kennedy was pretty clear on his reservations regarding the S.Viet gov't

Civil Rights still occurs as is, thus political parties will still reverse themselves

Medicare, wellfare, and the Great Society initiatives are significantly reduced perhaps lessening their impact today. Kennedy DID however support Medicare

I believe NASA still goes to the moon in the time prescribed by Kennedy. Dude put his d*ck on the table and was not gonna be made a fool.

I also believe our military would be significantly altered during Kennedy's second term. He had come to distrust and often loathe the entrenched brass

Nixon never gets elected with Bobby taking the helm in '68-'76. Perhaps the war on drugs doesn't occur possibly changing the cycle of violence we see today. That's a big whatif though


Those are a bunch of hippy pipe dreams that have no relation to Kennedy's actual policies and their consistencies with previous and future administrations.
This post was edited on 4/20/22 at 12:35 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram