Started By
Message

re: Here's why the country is freaking out and under virtual lock down - mathematical reason

Posted on 3/12/20 at 1:27 am to
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
49522 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 1:27 am to
Dude we care about old people now so inappropriate question
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
179042 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 1:28 am to
I care about old people too. I told my mom to stop visiting my uncle in the hospital for now but I am genuinely curious as to the youngest death so far.
Posted by Slimeball
Member since Jan 2020
159 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 1:31 am to
What would it take to convince you that this is a real problem? Seriously, it’s like you can’t read the numbers being posted in this thread. Either that or you really think youre just smarter than the rest of the world. There’s a difference between rooting for a disease and taking something seriously.
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
49522 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 1:34 am to
More than you are currently able to provide
Posted by Slimeball
Member since Jan 2020
159 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 1:35 am to
so stoic, so wise
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
49522 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 1:38 am to
Almost as stoic and wise as the poster who said my parents are going to choke to death
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
19141 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 1:42 am to
quote:

Does anyone know the age of the youngest person to die from it so far?


A few in their 30's in China.

Italian doctor said he had people in their 20's in the ICU (rare but there's a few).
Posted by Who_Dat_Tiger
Member since Nov 2015
24601 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 2:18 am to
quote:

A lot of misinformation out there right now. Doesnt help that you have the stupid motherfrickers who think they know more than medical experts parroting the same stupid arse take about flu deaths.


COVID-19 thread on main board is chock full of that
Posted by Lou Pai
Member since Dec 2014
29428 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 2:18 am to
quote:

No one has any immunity to the Coronavirus.


Similar to your flu reference, there are multiple coronavirus strains that cause the common cold every year. So I'm not sure that is 100% right but maybe I'm wrong.
Posted by dbeck
Member since Nov 2014
29454 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 3:19 am to
quote:

No one has any immunity to the Coronavirus.

You don't know me.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
99903 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 3:38 am to
This is why the media shouldn't be so biased constantly. Half the country doesnt trust them anymore and its their fault
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 3:53 am to
The “country” is not freaking and is not under “virtual lockdown”.
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
48676 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 4:19 am to
quote:


It’s hard to make fear kool-aid when you use the sugar(data) that doesnt taste as good in kool-aid.
. We can’t even be sure of the spread rate here when a lot of younger ppl who it isn’t effecting much are not seeking medical attention. Even though they are spreading it. So why would you believe the numbers coming out of China when we know they aren’t accurately reporting numbers.
This post was edited on 3/12/20 at 4:20 am
Posted by dupergreenie
Member since May 2014
8963 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 4:27 am to
quote:

not top phallic


Should be the next 'Kafka alter'.
Posted by Big EZ Tiger
Member since Jul 2010
26121 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 5:49 am to
It's more the unknown that has countries taking it so seriously now because there is no vaccine and there could be many out there who have it and could be spreading it, but don't know because they haven't been tested for it, etc. Countries don't want to overwhelm their healthcare system. What is known is that it appears to be containable as opposed to the flu which is not according to the head of the World Health Organization. That's a big positive.

One of the coronavirus experts said she believes the decline is real in places where strong safety measures are taken. Although the symptoms can be stronger than the flu and the death rate is estimated around 3.4% at the moment (still pretty low, but not as low as the flu's 0.2%), scientists also believe the death rate could be significantly lower as there are probably other cases of it not being reported due to milder symptoms and the fact that places have only recently started testing for it (as opposed to the flu, etc., which is commonly tested and often diagnosed).
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
52881 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 5:52 am to
quote:

Why did you leave out countries where the rate is slowing down?



Because they aren’t in growth phase of infection and therefore not applicable to the situation in the US. It’s a direct result of government action, not viral behavior.

Better question is why isn’t the US employing the same strategies as these nations (SK being the best example).
This post was edited on 3/12/20 at 6:00 am
Posted by BuckeyeFan87
Columbus
Member since Dec 2007
25249 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 5:53 am to
quote:

also understand that 70% of deaths in the USA have come from one retirement home. In fact, it was not actually a retirement home but rather it was an acute care facility where people are very old and very sick. 7 people die there on average every month without COVID19.


quote:

Two weeks ago, Italy had 322 confirmed cases of the coronavirus. At that point, doctors in the country’s hospitals could lavish significant attention on each stricken patient.
One week ago, Italy had 2,502 cases of the virus, which causes the disease known as COVID-19. At that point, doctors in the country’s hospitals could still perform the most lifesaving functions by artificially ventilating patients who experienced acute breathing difficulties.
Today, Italy has 10,149 cases of the coronavirus. There are now simply too many patients for each one of them to receive adequate care. Doctors and nurses are unable to tend to everybody. They lack machines to ventilate all those gasping for air.


It’s not all about “only some old people will die” and is more about keeping our hospitals at a level they can sustain. It’s also not only about this virus, it’s about the millions of patients who require medical attention outside of this disease(medical emergencies, cancer patients, etc) who would be put at risk by trying to enter a hospital overrun by corona infected patients.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
52881 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 5:55 am to
quote:



Does anyone know the age of the youngest person to die from it so far? Serious question because I have been curious about this. I know in Italy the youngest so far is 55.



I think there were some cases of sub 40, but obviously there were extenuating circumstances.

But what difference does it make? No one with a clue is arguing that it doesn’t focus on the elderly.
This post was edited on 3/12/20 at 6:25 am
Posted by Indubitably
Member since Jul 2015
55 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 5:56 am to
quote:

When have fearmongers ever been right?


Katrina
This post was edited on 3/12/20 at 6:01 am
Posted by GoHoGsGo06
Member since Nov 2006
5739 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 6:00 am to
quote:


Because they aren’t in growth phase of infection and therefore not applicable to the virus. It’s a direct result of government action, not viral behavior.

Better question is why isn’t the US employing the same strategies as these nations (SK being the best example).
Agreed 100%!
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram