- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Here is the Weaponry the North Koreans Would Use Against Us in a War
Posted on 8/10/17 at 2:32 pm to Clyde Tipton
Posted on 8/10/17 at 2:32 pm to Clyde Tipton
quote:
To be fair, their infantry rifles are better than ours.
Take an AK and an AR and put a target at 100yds.
1
Posted on 8/10/17 at 2:36 pm to tke857
Why don't we just donate Alaska to Canada. Problem solved.
Posted on 8/10/17 at 2:39 pm to tke857
We'd frick them so hard.
Posted on 8/10/17 at 2:39 pm to tke857
Snorkel technology allowing diesel-electric boats to recharge submerged has been around since WWII. NK submarines, antiquated though they are, will surely have this capability.
Posted on 8/10/17 at 2:40 pm to tke857
I don't know know what taepodong they'd bring to this fight, but it'd be the last time they used it.
Posted on 8/10/17 at 2:40 pm to LSU Wayne
quote:
we'd probably take them out using unmanned aircraft flown by some folks using joysticks sitting in some suburban nondescript building in the middle of nowhere USA.
Bald eagle boner
Posted on 8/10/17 at 2:40 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
quote:
Take an AK and an AR and put a target at 100yds.
If given the choice, which would you rather be shot in the chest with at 20 yards?
Posted on 8/10/17 at 2:42 pm to tke857
there is no concern about what would happen in a conventional war with NK
the concern is them lobbing a few nukes into SK and Japan, which would kill millions upon millions.
the concern is them lobbing a few nukes into SK and Japan, which would kill millions upon millions.
Posted on 8/10/17 at 2:43 pm to Clyde Tipton
quote:
If given the choice, which would you rather be shot in the chest with at 20 yards?
If that's your main metric then
Your grandiddy's 30.06 >> AK
This post was edited on 8/10/17 at 2:44 pm
Posted on 8/10/17 at 2:46 pm to Hollywood
The underground network is pretty well mapped, control of space and fine-tuning sensors enables lots of shite for analyst to look over. Seismic tells us more.
The thing is it doesn't matter how antiquated their gear is. They have a large population hostage. Zeroed in. Seoul and it's lives and the Garrison on DMZ are rubble because it's going to be a wave of metal and death cult. And it doesn't matter that the guns are rusting, enough of them will fire to make it the worst days of modern warfare history.
Tunnels? We fricked the Vietcong and the Japs out of them on the reg. It's the willpower to do it right that is the difference between Japan and Vietnam.
It's going to be a bloody affair that will resemble a mix of the WW3 scenarios and the guerilla campaigns we've prepared for and have had.
And we'll just all have to pray the nuclear beast stays out of it.
The thing is it doesn't matter how antiquated their gear is. They have a large population hostage. Zeroed in. Seoul and it's lives and the Garrison on DMZ are rubble because it's going to be a wave of metal and death cult. And it doesn't matter that the guns are rusting, enough of them will fire to make it the worst days of modern warfare history.
Tunnels? We fricked the Vietcong and the Japs out of them on the reg. It's the willpower to do it right that is the difference between Japan and Vietnam.
It's going to be a bloody affair that will resemble a mix of the WW3 scenarios and the guerilla campaigns we've prepared for and have had.
And we'll just all have to pray the nuclear beast stays out of it.
Posted on 8/10/17 at 2:47 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
there is no concern about what would happen in a conventional war with NK
the concern is them lobbing a few nukes into SK and Japan, which would kill millions upon millions.
The concern is the 100's of thousands of mortar shells that would rain down on Seoul.
We have a countermeasure for it but even if 25% get through, there will be mass casualties.
Posted on 8/10/17 at 2:47 pm to Clyde Tipton
quote:
If given the choice, which would you rather be shot in the chest with at 20 yards?
From 20 yards I'm dying either way. So I don't really have a preference
Posted on 8/10/17 at 2:50 pm to tke857
They're waiting in caves
Posted on 8/10/17 at 2:50 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
If that's your main metric then
Your grandiddy's 30.06 >> AK
Right except that we are not comparing the 30.06. We are only comparing the AR and AK.
We could debate this all day and not change either's mind about the subject. I concede the AR is more accurate and really cool how it parts out. I just personally like AK's better than AR's and that was the only basis of my original comment.
This post was edited on 8/10/17 at 2:52 pm
Posted on 8/10/17 at 2:51 pm to Clyde Tipton
quote:
To be fair, their infantry rifles are better than ours.
What manner of bullshite is this?
Posted on 8/10/17 at 2:51 pm to LSU Wayne
quote:
we'd probably take them out using unmanned aircraft flown by some folks using joysticks sitting in some suburban nondescript building in the middle of nowhere USA.
I don't consider Las Vegas middle of nowhere USA
Posted on 8/10/17 at 2:52 pm to Spaceman Spiff
quote:
What manner of bullshite is this?
Russian collusion.
Posted on 8/10/17 at 2:58 pm to tke857
Well, "quantity has a quality all its own."
Posted on 8/10/17 at 3:01 pm to Clyde Tipton
We have 20+ F22s in Hawaii ( not to mention whatever we have in AK). Air space secured in half an hour.
This post was edited on 8/10/17 at 3:02 pm
Posted on 8/10/17 at 3:03 pm to tke857
The problem with north korea is they have thousands of artillery pieces pointed at Seoul.
We could take out their entire military in a few hours but an hour of NK shelling Seoul and god forbid one of their shitty nukes would bring massive civilian casualties.
We could take out their entire military in a few hours but an hour of NK shelling Seoul and god forbid one of their shitty nukes would bring massive civilian casualties.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News