re: Heart Disease leading cause of death in america

quote:

---

I recommend the 7-hour podcast Dr. Peter Attia did with Dr. Tom Dayspring as a primer on lipidology.

---

That’s gonna be a no from me dawg

Wait so it's not breast cancer?

Processed meats? For sure

And regular meats activate the mTor pathway and could accelerate aging and cancer as well.

That being said, I eat meat probably twice a day.

Do you have evidence to suggest otherwise?

quote:

---

Plaque is formed from LDL, meats and animal products are extremely high in cholesterol. Simply eating eggs will put you 5 times over the daily recommended cholesterol intake.

---

dietary cholesterol has never been causally linked to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Damn, I thought Brett Kavanaugh was the leading cause of death in America.

quote:

---

And regular meats activate the mTor pathway and could accelerate aging and cancer as well. 

---

I don't feel like an mTor debate on my phone because my thumbs will fall off. Have you kept up with Sabatini on this?

thought this has been the case for decades?

i remember kidd kraddick dying in nola from heart disease and he didn't even know he had it.

quote:

---

You can’t see the forest for the trees. The obesity epidemic isn’t because people are eating too many carbs as opposed to fat or protein. If people just substituted all their carb calories for fat/protein calories we would still have a massive problem. Sugar is just easier to consume and less satiating so it leads to over consumption.

Again, no one on a net negative caloric intake is getting insulin resistant.

---

I very well see the forest and the trees here. You are making an argument out of semantics, in one way;and you are wrong --dead wrong--in others: e.g., your statement that I underscored is almost certainly false, including as a result of your defeater in the very next sentence, bolded.
the bold part really does go a long way toward making my point.

And the statement in italics is almost completely irrelevant in practice, applied to the population writ large, even if it is technically true--how long does this person remain in a net caloric deficit? What % of the population can do this, and for how long? What did this person do to get into a state where he or she needed to go to a net caloric deficit? How does one maintain such a state?

If you think you can consume nothing but fructose over an extended period of time and remain in a sufficiently healthy metabolic state to operate at a net calorie deficiency, then I don't have much else to say about that hypothesis. (Maybe if you locked someone in a lab, but not in vivo.)

speaking of forest:trees....