- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Harvey Weinstein conviction overturned
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:00 am to EZE Tiger Fan
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:00 am to EZE Tiger Fan
Trump isn’t on trial for rape.
1
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:01 am to Corso
It disturbs me that our system’s fundamental rules of a criminal trial have so much gray area that even a panel of 7 appellate judges make a decision on a 4-3 split.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:05 am to pankReb
Against a persons will
Those whores knew exactly what they were doing with Harvey
Those whores knew exactly what they were doing with Harvey
This post was edited on 4/25/24 at 9:13 am
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:08 am to Walt OReilly
If Harvey wasn’t fat and gross he wouldn’t have ever gone to trial
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:10 am to Corso
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:12 am to Corso
Someone got paid...
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:13 am to pankReb
quote:
Trump isn’t on trial for rape.
E Jean Carroll laughs at you while she goes on TV laughing about spending Trump's money that she won for false accusations.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:14 am to EZE Tiger Fan
New trial. Bleed him dry.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:19 am to EZE Tiger Fan
quote:
E Jean Carroll laughs at you while she goes on TV laughing about spending Trump's money that she won for false accusations.
So is Trump on trial for rape or not?
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:20 am to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
quote:
If my daughter was one of his victims, that dude would be hanging from a bridge
While I agree Harvey is a POS, these women slept with him to further their career. I guarantee you he isn't the first or last movie producer to offer to cast a pretty girl in a film in exchange for some pussy. It's a tale as old as time.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:21 am to Walt OReilly
So it’s of your opinion that Harvey did nothing wrong and is innocent.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:24 am to Corso
Guess it is true: "Money Talks! bullshite walks!"
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:27 am to victoire sécurisé
quote:
It disturbs me that our system’s fundamental rules of a criminal trial have so much gray area that even a panel of 7 appellate judges make a decision on a 4-3 split.
Good point.
How hard is it to rig 7 and 5 judge panels?
Moreover, these kinds of tiny judicial panels (or even single judges) are being used to subvert case justice or overturn millions of votes as per State "Propositions"? (see California several times)
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:28 am to The Boat
quote:
If Harvey wasn’t fat and gross he wouldn’t have ever gone to trial
You say that in jest, but it is probably not 100% false.
Did Weinstein use his position of power in the industry to have sex with women who he otherwise would not have been able to get? ABSOLUTELY!
Did those women knowingly participate because they wanted the career/lifestyle benefits Weinstein could provide? VERY LIKELY
But the reality is if Weinstein was an attractive guy who could offer the same lifestyle/career benefits in exchange for sex you'd probably have very few complaints because the women would have happily wanted to have sex with him...even though it was essentially the same quid-pro-quo.
I'm sure Leo DiCaprio, Brad Pitt, George Clooney, and Bob Saget traded their power for sex on at least a few occasions. But it was ok because they were good looking.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:31 am to GeauxTigers123
quote:
So basically they didn’t follow procedure? But everyone still knows he did at least some of what was alleged?
Not a big fan of a fair trial baw?
We all know he's guilty af but he's entitled to a fair trial regardless.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:35 am to victoire sécurisé
quote:
It disturbs me that our system’s fundamental rules of a criminal trial have so much gray area that even a panel of 7 appellate judges make a decision on a 4-3 split.
Evidence of an uncharged prior bad act can be admitted not to prove guilt in the instant case, but to show knowledge or intent.
Louisiana's versions:
quote:
In order to show intent, evidence is admissible of similar acts, independent of the act charged as a crime in the indictment, for though intent is a question of fact, it need not be proven as a fact, it may be inferred from the circumstances of the transaction.
quote:
When knowledge or intent forms an essential part of the inquiry, testimony may be offered of such acts, conduct or declarations of the accused as tend to establish such knowledge or intent and where the offense is one of a system, evidence is admissible to prove the continuity of the offense, and the commission of similar offenses for the purpose of showing guilty knowledge and intent, but not to prove the offense charged.
All depends on the case and what one is trying to prove by using it.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:37 am to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
He ain’t going nowhere, he was also convicted in CA.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:37 am to Corso
He's a piece of crap, but he can probably roll over on some bigger turds, this go round.
Now he knows, they aint comin to help him.
Now he knows, they aint comin to help him.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:43 am to WPBTiger
It's more procedural at this point
He will still be in prison until he dies due to the other rape trial he was sentenced for
He will still be in prison until he dies due to the other rape trial he was sentenced for
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:43 am to Corso
quote:
reopens a painful chapter in America’s reckoning with sexual misconduct by powerful figures
Pfffffffft
Page 2 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News