victoire sécurisé

[quote]Can anyone explain why Trump's the one being constantly questioned about Russian meddling?[/quote] You ask a serious question, so I'll give a serious answer. There is a mountain of circumstantial evidence linking Trump's sphere of influence to Russia. - His appointed Nat Sec Advisor,...

He should get a job with Trent Lott....

Whatever the next Trump administration clusterfrick happens to be. The stories don't die. They just get supplanted by the next clusterfrick....

[quote]next guy in[/quote] My guess would be Tory Carter on rushing downs. Derrick Dillon or another WR (along with only Moreau) on passing downs....

[quote]Yes, I believe that any public speaker can mis-speak. It's not uncommon.[/quote] This is true. Trump's excuse is not. And you know it....

I'm buying that he's a cowering pussygrabber in the face of bipartisan criticism over his shitty diplomacy. I mean seriously, what kind of coward comes up with this kind of excuse and expects reasonable people to believe him? Even apologists don't [b]believe [/b]him....

[quote]So, you don't know then?[/quote] Sure, let's launch into the merits of using Title II to enforce open access to the internet vs allowing the FTC to enforce vs congress passing a net neutrality bill. That''ll be a fun, productive use of time....

[quote]What makes you think title 2 is needed for this?[/quote] I wish I had a good answer, but my ISP won't allow me to get to any of the sites to research it....

[quote]Is this real?[/quote] How do you explain Trump failing to remove Flynn from NSC for 15 days after he had been informed that Flynn had been compromised? Why did he only fire Flynn only after this FACT had been leaked to the press?...

[quote]they could start throttling everyone's access[/quote] How do you know they're not? There is no way to tell. Even if they were suspected of it, there's no way to tell. There is no legal means to investigate them for it because there is no law against it. Yay?...

So we should wait until after big ISP's start throttling websites to make a law against it?...

Treason has yet to be seen. Let's find out what Trump's motivation was for refusing to remove Flynn from office after the FBI informed him that Flynn had talked to "Team Syria". I'll tell you one thing though: we sure as hell need an investigation into it....

[quote]where is the dissension and division coming from?[/quote] from people who have chosen to trust Vladimir Putin over the FBI. ...

He's an unpopular (fewer votes) president acting provocatively unpopular. You can expect negative media coverage....

[quote]and what conspiracy am I alleging?[/quote] The same Dannenmeyer BS that has been making the circles since 1994. It's the stuff of tin foil hat legend. People want to believe the nefarious Clinton drama so badly....

[quote]Air flight 655[/quote] It took the US less than 2 months to go through the process of damage control (initial instinct was to lie, as is typical in politics) and then admit that Capt Rogers was wrong. When Russia pays $60MM and apologizes, I'll play your game of moral equivalency....

When one of Hillary's "targets" shows up with polonium poisoning, and the entire international community condemns her, I'll play your game of moral equivalence. Until then, you're a conspiracy theory nut. ...

[quote]Does anybody really think the U.S. wouldn't try and hack information from geopolitical rivals? It's amazing to me that this would come as a surprise to anyone. Hell, we spied on allies.[/quote] Whataboutism at its finest. When our soldiers get shot in battle, we don't shrug and say, "We...

You do not seem to grasp that the US & Russia's mercinaries have been engaged in active combat. We are basically at war with Russia in Syria. Given this fact, how can you think that Russia has our best interests at heart?...

[quote]Do you feel the same about Obama because he funded the Free Syrian Army?[/quote] Funding mercenaries to fight a proxy war is not the moral equivalent of shooting down a civilian airliner....