- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Halle Berry Ordered to Pay 16k/month in Child Support
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:42 am to Manzielathon
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:42 am to Manzielathon
It's a shame you didn't take advantage of the opportunity to learn something.
This post was edited on 6/10/14 at 10:42 am
1
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:43 am to boosiebadazz
a lot of broken homes on the ot
and, from another thread, a damn lot of people who have served time.
shame. this place used to be so classy.
and, from another thread, a damn lot of people who have served time.
shame. this place used to be so classy.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:44 am to TexasTiger05
ageed. a lot of dudes made bad decisions about who to marry and then they take it out on the truth-tellers like myself
smh
smh
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:47 am to boosiebadazz
you syh with a furrowed brow? I am. That's how disappointed I am
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:54 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
seems like a lot of bitter ones, too
I noticed that if a male doesn't have a pro female viewpoint he is labeled "bitter". Just an observation.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:55 am to TexasTiger05
slowly, with furrowed brow, and some tsk tsks thrown in for good measure
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:55 am to boosiebadazz
No, it's not.
Why do you think that finding one example disproves it?
It's like saying (and I am not claiming its this lopsided) that something isn't one sided because you've found the one. The other 99 outcomes out of 100 don't matter.
Which is assumed to be the mother by default in sole custody cases. Trying to get the child turns into a smear fest by the father. (BTW, the judge was recommended by the evaluator in this case to give Barry custody)
This is an outlier case because it was a situation where a super rich woman had a joint custody agreement in place which she tried to break. I suspect the latter part was a big part of the reason.
This doesn't mean that things are not slanted among average income individuals seeking judgement on initial custody.
Why do you think that finding one example disproves it?
It's like saying (and I am not claiming its this lopsided) that something isn't one sided because you've found the one. The other 99 outcomes out of 100 don't matter.
quote:
Custody is slanted in what is in the best interest of the child
Which is assumed to be the mother by default in sole custody cases. Trying to get the child turns into a smear fest by the father. (BTW, the judge was recommended by the evaluator in this case to give Barry custody)
This is an outlier case because it was a situation where a super rich woman had a joint custody agreement in place which she tried to break. I suspect the latter part was a big part of the reason.
This doesn't mean that things are not slanted among average income individuals seeking judgement on initial custody.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:56 am to BabyrayS2k
I noticed a lot of butthurt pussies yapping about da law when it's actually societal norms and tendencies that lead to these allegedly "pro-women" outcomes
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:59 am to boosiebadazz
You have to be trolling.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 11:02 am to BabyrayS2k
buncha dummies don't know about causation and correlation
Not my fault. Prolly the same reason they made shitty decisions about who to marry.
Not my fault. Prolly the same reason they made shitty decisions about who to marry.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 11:06 am to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
You can't make this statement before seeing what the average child support payments are for male celebrities with >60M net worth.
Any response?
Posted on 6/10/14 at 11:06 am to BabyrayS2k
quote:
You have to be trolling.
nope, he(?) always shows up in these type threads, the bias and complete disregard for factual data is strong in this one
Posted on 6/10/14 at 11:07 am to boosiebadazz
Kids are so awesome. If I had a divorce all I would want would be the child.
But in our court, whoever wins the child ALSO gets free money. It's absurd! Have friends paying $1800/month for one kid. The payments are criminal! If you win custody there is no reason to work, any income gets used against you.
Then they use your gross income as if you have no taxes or living expenses. The whole system needs to DIAF.
But in our court, whoever wins the child ALSO gets free money. It's absurd! Have friends paying $1800/month for one kid. The payments are criminal! If you win custody there is no reason to work, any income gets used against you.
Then they use your gross income as if you have no taxes or living expenses. The whole system needs to DIAF.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 11:09 am to boosiebadazz
quote:my sister is divorced, makes more than her ex, 50/50 joint custody... He pays her $800/month.
No, it's not. Custody is slanted in what is in the best interest of the child, and support is based on the standard of living and the relative income of the parties
Posted on 6/10/14 at 11:11 am to 777Tiger
One of the dumber self-proclaimed smart people on this site.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 11:12 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Not my fault. Prolly the same reason they made shitty decisions about who to marry.
Well you could put me in that group of dummies too I guess. When I married her, I truly didn't know it was a bad decision. I just knew that I loved her and thought she was amazing. Then I came home from work on a Thursday and she was gone. Not sure what I could have done to see that coming. But you seem to know a lot.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 11:13 am to 777Tiger
quote:
Yet courts for the most part think that, as long as the mom is stable, being with her is in the kid's best interest. Even today, men are more often bread winners so that works against them when it comes to spousal support. At first glance the law seems objective but societal norms/tendencies most often lead to the same result: Mom with custody and dad paying child support, and spousal support. it is what it is.
This is the best explanation in the whole thread.
Did I choose an outlier case to make a larger point? Sure.
The law is written how the law is written. There is no reference to gender. How people live and the gender roles in most families is what determines these outcomes.
That was the whole point of the thread. All the butthurt and downvotes and ad hominems were just a bonus
This post was edited on 6/10/14 at 11:13 am
Posted on 6/10/14 at 11:13 am to boosiebadazz
Supposed to be based....
Not is based.......
Not is based.......
Posted on 6/10/14 at 11:14 am to junkfunky
quote:
self-proclaimed smart people
link?
Posted on 6/10/14 at 11:14 am to lsunurse
That's tragic and a horrible circumstance.
Page 4 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News