- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Great Wealth Transfer is going in the wrong direction
Posted on 7/19/26 at 5:34 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 7/19/26 at 5:34 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
This is honestly pathetic on the part of older Americans. The stock market went up like a rocket for most of their working careers. Where is all that money?
The fact they had a 20 year head start over every other generation and still managed to fumble the bag proves their incompetence. Quit taking any of their advice a long time ago and my life improved tremendously.
This post was edited on 7/19/26 at 5:42 pm
Posted on 7/19/26 at 5:59 pm to TigerintheNO
Let's say if I was waiting for the wealth transfer from my parents I would be screwed. I have taken my own initiative to create a good retirement for myself and my family.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 6:01 pm to TigerintheNO
Rich get richer
Poor get poorer
If you aren't worth 100 million now you are poor and will keep getting poorer.
Poor get poorer
If you aren't worth 100 million now you are poor and will keep getting poorer.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 6:09 pm to TigerintheNO
The great wealth transfer has been from the middle class to the richest shareholders / investors.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 6:17 pm to Defenseiskey
quote:
This is honestly pathetic on the part of older Americans. The stock market went up like a rocket for most of their working careers. Where is all that money?
The fact they had a 20 year head start over every other generation and still managed to fumbled the bag proves their incompetence.
Since you didn't read the article. Here is a little tidbit for you:
quote:
Boomers' retirement savings are often smaller than those of younger generations because 401(k)s and Roth IRAs became widely available later in their workplace lives. Even those lucky enough to have workplace pensions (7) or annuities often receive modest payments. According to the Pension Rights Center, the median annual benefit from private pensions or annuities was $11,440 in 2024.
You misunderstand how the financial system actually worked for Boomers. 401(k)s weren't created until 1978 and didn't become common until the 90s. Boomers spent the first 15 to 20 years of their careers without access to the tax advantaged accounts you younger generations take for granted. So Boomers didn't have the 20 year head start you think they did and a lot of them had their pensions frozen and slashed by the companies they worked for. And if you think it was easy to invest in the stock market, it wasn't. A Boomer had to set up an account which took the equivalent of $7500.00 in today dollars in the 70s, physically call a broker on the phone to place a trade and then pay the transaction fees which would be around $150 to $300.00 in today. Now anyone can download an app, open an account with a minimum amount of cash, buy $5 worth of a fractional share, and pay $0 in trading fees.
Not making excuses. Just pointing out it was not as easy to save for retirement then as it is now.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 6:32 pm to TigerintheNO
quote:
Boomers didn't save for retirement
Well no shite. The government held their hand too much, and made bankruptcy too forgivable. Credit card companies were too predatory. Everybody kicked the can down the road.
Now we're on the hook for that generation as well as our own. Plus a lot of the one after us.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 6:41 pm to La Place Mike
quote:
Just pointing out it was not as easy to save for retirement then as it is now.
Thanks for pointing this out. Excellent points.
Options were an even bigger pain in the arse to trade back in the day, the spreads were large, and the commissions astronomical. Today it’s like you’re on the floor but at home drinking your coffee.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 8:13 pm to TigerintheNO
These threads are awesome.
It always brings out the halfwits that can't do math.
10% of 200T is still a ton of money and assets.
But keep watching CNN and CBS, and by all means, keep voting Democrat.
It always brings out the halfwits that can't do math.
10% of 200T is still a ton of money and assets.
But keep watching CNN and CBS, and by all means, keep voting Democrat.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 8:28 pm to TigerintheNO
You mean the selfish generation spent all their money and will leave their heirs with massive debt and still expect them to take care of them?
No way
No way
Posted on 7/19/26 at 8:28 pm to La Place Mike
quote:
Not making excuses. Just pointing out it was not as easy to save for retirement then as it is now.
Agreed.
The dollars back then didn't lead to a high need for huge sums of retirement assets.
In 1970, an 18 year old would love to live off of $10k/yr with assets paid for (home/car).
What type of retirement is that 18 year old targeting as he/she starts their employment path. $100k-$200k?
As they aged, the annual funds were still low by today's standards (even if they doubled and tripled).
A disciplined 22 year old, today, can start a path towards $100k so much quicker than I could back in the 2000s. Duh.
My 16/17 year olds are making more than my wife did 25 year ago.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 9:47 pm to BobABooey
quote:
Meaning you could have millions in stocks and other investments but, technically speaking, social security is your only income.
Highly unlikely. I guess you could be 100% munis and only have tax-exempt interest income.
You will still get fricked with IRMAA though as tax exempt interest is added back to your income for the calculation.
But that’s a dumb tax strategy as you have the standard deduction to use up with dividends and interest.
Point being, don’t let the tax boogeyman drive your decisions. This approach keeps you poor and makes others rich.
We have historically low rates now so take advantage and be smart.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 9:53 pm to TigerintheNO
I didn’t fail to plan. We will leave our two kids a sack of shekels.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 9:56 pm to TigerintheNO
quote:
Adult children are supporting cash-strapped boomer parents
Hogwash. More often not, the opposite is true.
Posted on 7/20/26 at 8:45 am to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:on a similar note.
maybe a nice windfall on sale of his paid off house.
hopefully there's no reverse mortgage!
Reading Teech’s thread about the mother in law possibly needing long term care and moving in.
But several posters mentioned making sure to get a good elderly care attorney for a survivorship or whatever so the tax payers can ultimately pay for the Boomers care instead of selling off the assets they accrued over their lifetime for I assume to prepare to pay for the inevitable care.
Does that not sit wrong with everyone else?
How is this even a thing? No wonder our Medicare and Medicare expenditures are ungodly
Posted on 7/20/26 at 10:32 am to SuperSaint
No, it isn't.
If you try to shield all the assets from the government so the individual can receive government-paid care, the government will quickly do a clawback and sieze the funds.
There's a bit more to it, but that's a quick summary.
Usually, the people that try crap like that are trying to keep MeMaw's double wide for themselves.
If you try to shield all the assets from the government so the individual can receive government-paid care, the government will quickly do a clawback and sieze the funds.
There's a bit more to it, but that's a quick summary.
Usually, the people that try crap like that are trying to keep MeMaw's double wide for themselves.
Posted on 7/20/26 at 12:50 pm to Shexter
quote:
quote:
41% of boomers aged 65 to 79 still have mortgages,
Is this a product of the rising numbers of divorce? My plan was to have my house paid off at 48-50 years old, but had to refinance at 45 due to divorce property settlement.
A lot of them, including this one, refinanced at such historically low rates that it makes no sense to pay off the mortgage. My mortgage rate is less than inflation. If we do get to a point that we can't pay it, then it in effect becomes an investment vehicle for the kids, but it is very unlikely that we will reach that point.
Posted on 7/20/26 at 12:53 pm to wm72
quote:
The great wealth transfer has been from the middle class to the Free shite Army, half of whom crossed the border during the last administration .
FIFY
SNAP
EBT
Obama Phones
Tax credits
Welfare
Non-payment for ER visits and other healthcare
Prison costs
Housing inflation as the demand at the low end ballooned
Ad infinitum
Popular
Back to top

1










