- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Google does not like TigerDroppings - blacklists it!
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:28 pm to GRTiger
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:28 pm to GRTiger
quote:
What's ironic about the entire exercise of humoring Drac's bad faith discussion strategy by providing the links is how hard it was to locate these examples on Google. I had to know the name of the researcher and the specific story about the internal e-mails to get them in a search result.
You don’t think it’s important to actually have support for a claim?
0
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:28 pm to mmmmmbeeer
quote:The point is the inconsistency. Plenty of leftist websites tout conspiracies and are run by POS people, but yet they remain off the list. But it doesn't matter because everyone by now knows Google's agenda. If you needed further proof, or if you've been living under a rock, it's there in the OP.
Why didn't I see that when I first clicked on this thread instead of reading all of the replies? Granted, there were some hard truths pointed out in this thread but, still, anything from Project Veritas should be taken with a grain of salt. James O'Keefe, the site's founder, is a grade A piece of shite liar.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:28 pm to TH03
quote:
Where do you think TD gets it?
News doesn't break here. It's brought here from Twitter or from news site.
TD never breaks any LSU football news? Texags certainly has broken plenty of news related to A&M and A&M football, I could only imagine that TD and SEC rant has done the same.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:29 pm to Logician
quote:
Plenty of leftist websites tout conspiracies and are run by POS people, but yet they remain off the list.
Ok, name some
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:31 pm to GRTiger
quote:WTF? I searched "examples of google bias" and of my top 10 results, 5 claimed there is bias, 3 claimed no bias, and 2 were kind of iffy.
Simply Googling "examples of Google/Facebook/Twitter bias" only returns articles about how they aren't biased. Imagine that.
Either you're lying, or your own search history bias is turning up in your search results.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:33 pm to Korkstand
quote:
WTF? I searched "examples of google bias" and of my top 10 results, 5 claimed there is bias, 3 claimed no bias, and 2 were kind of iffy.
Either you're lying, or your own search history bias is turning up in your search results.
literally the first result on Google
quote:
Trump is right: More than Facebook & Twitter, Google threatens democracy, online freedom
LINK
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:34 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:name a few
For example a YouTube personality may be demonetized or a Twitter user banned not because of their political believes but their behavior. That is NOT targeting conservatives yet is cited as such regularly.
quote:can you prove they aren't? link?
the idea that as a company Google or whoever is thinking up ways to attack conservative thought just is not born out in any kind of meaningful way
quote:any proof of this?
WSJ, a right wing media source liking to fan the flames of fear as discussed
quote:link to the right lying?
The issue I have is the right frequently distorting and lying not only about the focus of this issue but the effects
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:35 pm to TH03
Ok, but how is that different than WAFB breaking a news story they learned from some national outlet?
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:36 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:any website that pushed the pee pee dossier as fact and the russian collusion conspiracy as a whole.
Ok, name some
damn, you're bad at this.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:36 pm to LCA131
Something about TD being labeled as the "voice of reason" is pretty damn comical given the last decade of this site.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:37 pm to GRTiger
quote:Did you check Bing?
What's ironic about the entire exercise of humoring Drac's bad faith discussion strategy by providing the links is how hard it was to locate these examples on Google. I had to know the name of the researcher and the specific story about the internal e-mails to get them in a search result.
For future reference, if something is difficult to locate on Google, that generally means that what you're looking for has very little support among the entire rest of the internet/world. This usually means that it is false, or inconsequential / nobody gives a shite.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:37 pm to Chicken
quote:
News doesn't break here. It's brought here from Twitter or from news site.
maybe but most news sites are just regurgitating what they learned from another source
Looks like we've got a classic chicken/egg scenario
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:38 pm to Salmon
quote:
literally the first result on Google
quote:
Trump is right: More than Facebook & Twitter, Google threatens democracy, online freedom
That was my top result, too. GRTiger is way deep in bullshite.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:41 pm to Korkstand
quote:
Either you're lying
I promise I'm not. The article Salmon quotes below is the exact one I linked. Perhaps by clicking on my examples, your results were adjusted.
The one article suggesting bias when I searched was Google's efforts to fine-tune its machine learning to prevent generic bias (such as assuming all neurosurgeons are male because the algorithm detects a majority male population in the industry).
Drac, thank you so much for responding to my examples of bias by dismissing the Wall Street Journal as having too much right leaning bias to be trusted. It was a prefect retort.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:44 pm to dfintlyHmmrd
quote:
as this isnt really a news site.
I get all my news from TigerDroppings.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:45 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
I don’t have to prove an accusation is false, you have to prove it’s true.
How rich coming from you!
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:47 pm to Korkstand
quote:
For future reference, if something is difficult to locate on Google, that generally means that what you're looking for has very little support among the entire rest of the internet/world. This usually means that it is false, or inconsequential / nobody gives a shite.
Jesus Christ, I can't write these justifications any better.
"If Google thinks a peer-reviewed researcher who recently testified before the Senate about Google bias is not important, they will adjust the info they feed me accordingly."
Of course, when I google "Trump two scoops" I have a multitude of options for reading about how absurd he is.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:50 pm to TigerMyth36
quote:By far my favorite part
How rich coming from you!
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:51 pm to GRTiger
quote:Care to share your top results for "examples of google bias"?
I promise I'm not.
quote:
The article Salmon quotes below is the exact one I linked. Perhaps by clicking on my examples, your results were adjusted.
Or, you know, perhaps it's just a high-ranking link. Both Bing and DuckDuckGo have that exact link in their top 2 results for the same phrase.
You are too ate up with this shite to think logically.
Page 6 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News