- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Google does not like TigerDroppings - blacklists it!
Posted on 8/14/19 at 2:36 pm to GRTiger
Posted on 8/14/19 at 2:36 pm to GRTiger
quote:
This is a statement with zero regard for how Google works.
quote:Google absolutely does NOT put recently visited pages at the top of the fricking search results. That is the most idiotic thing I've ever heard. Why would you want to be presented with shite you've already clicked all the time if it's not the legit top content? Again, Bing and DuckDuckGo have the same exact article at #2, and Google has it #1. AND IT IS ANTI-GOOGLE.
Because I gave you the fricking link, which you clicked before keying a search that was related to it.
So what is more likely? Google has stupidly started, for the first time ever, putting recently visited links at #1 in their search results? Or that page is a legit high-ranking page?
Come on, dude.
quote:No, because I understand how it works.
Do you get spooked when a car dealership ad pops up on your screen after you click a review of the 2020 Chevy Corvette? Do you get spooked when that exact same review comes up in the results when you search "2020 Chevy Corvettes"?
quote:
Have you never noticed dynamic search results before? I'm seriously curious now.
Man, you just have no clue. 
1
Posted on 8/14/19 at 2:37 pm to Chicken
C'mon dude.
Breaking news is when its happens.
Picking up from the AP or World Service is just reporting the news.
Other than tweets or grapevine local stuff, news isn't getting broken here on anything that matters.
Just roll in your Ad money. Enjoy it, then sell it for a shitload someday.
Breaking news is when its happens.
Picking up from the AP or World Service is just reporting the news.
Other than tweets or grapevine local stuff, news isn't getting broken here on anything that matters.
Just roll in your Ad money. Enjoy it, then sell it for a shitload someday.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 2:40 pm to Chicken
quote:
Ok, but how is that different than WAFB breaking a news story they learned from some national outlet?
The national outlet broke the news. WAFB shared it to a new audience. Most of the time when that happens, the local news article is just copied and pasted from the national outlet.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 2:49 pm to GRTiger
I know kork IRL.
That makes your argument look a lot more stupid.
That makes your argument look a lot more stupid.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:12 pm to Brazos
Yeah but that's a message board for Democrats to go nuts around others. The political board was started to keep political talk off the Off topic board and main forum of a LSU sports site.
You can't compare the political board to the DU.
You can't compare the political board to the DU.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:15 pm to Chicken
Also since you're here.
Free LucasP.
Free LucasP.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:17 pm to sacrathetic
quote:
The blacklist is for the news aggregator, not for general google searches.
Good because the TD search feature still sucks.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:24 pm to sacrathetic
Has anyone looked at the Project Veritas site? Holy shite!
LINK
There is no doubt they seem like a legit source of news...
I like the video in which a black girl wears a Make America Great Again hat. First of all, why did they block out her face? If she was willing to go around NYC with it why would they block out her face?
And every person who made a comment towards her.. You really couldn't read their lips. And then the guy she is talking to at the end, the camera doesn't show him while he is talking. As soon as he starts talking, the camera goes up so that his head isn't in view..
If I would have just looked at their website I would have not wasted time looking to see of some of these sites were "blacklisted" or even legit..
LINK
There is no doubt they seem like a legit source of news...
I like the video in which a black girl wears a Make America Great Again hat. First of all, why did they block out her face? If she was willing to go around NYC with it why would they block out her face?
And every person who made a comment towards her.. You really couldn't read their lips. And then the guy she is talking to at the end, the camera doesn't show him while he is talking. As soon as he starts talking, the camera goes up so that his head isn't in view..
If I would have just looked at their website I would have not wasted time looking to see of some of these sites were "blacklisted" or even legit..
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:27 pm to sacrathetic
As members, can we sue Google?
We can receive our class action settlement and chicken can distribute our dividend to us. I think we all trust everyone here.
ETA
We all receive our post count in dollars, or British pounds. Depending on if overseas baws complain too.
We can receive our class action settlement and chicken can distribute our dividend to us. I think we all trust everyone here.
ETA
We all receive our post count in dollars, or British pounds. Depending on if overseas baws complain too.
This post was edited on 8/14/19 at 3:30 pm
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:37 pm to sacrathetic
So every site that isn’t full of progressive totalitarians?
Posted on 8/14/19 at 4:03 pm to TH03
quote:its semantics. Fox News will often "break news" that was broken by someone else. My point is that multiple outlets will "break" the same news to their respective audiences.
The national outlet broke the news. WAFB shared it to a new audience. Most of the time when that happens, the local news article is just copied and pasted from the national outlet.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 4:08 pm to Chicken
quote:
semantics. Fox News will often "break news" that was broken by someone else. My point is that multiple outlets will "break" the same news to their respective audiences.
And of course you are 100% correct, per usual, mr. Boss.
TH03 is such a tool
Posted on 8/14/19 at 4:30 pm to WeeWee
GCS is such a soy boy
Posted on 8/14/19 at 4:44 pm to The Boat
What does that have to do with me?
Posted on 8/14/19 at 5:16 pm to Korkstand
quote:
Google absolutely does NOT put recently visited pages at the top of the fricking search results.
Lol wut
Google absolutely uses search and web history to personalize search results. I could probably scrounge up some evidence to support this if I cared to spend time looking through 6-7 year old documents, or violating confidentiality clauses. I did work specifically on data protection related to this very thing. For Google. It has a specific name. Google it, bitch.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 5:23 pm to GRTiger
quote:
Lol wut
Google absolutely uses search and web history to personalize search results.
No shite! They personalize your results, this is extremely well-known. What I said they do NOT do is simply put recently-visited pages in the #1 spot of search results, as you are claiming they did to all of us. That's just stupid.
quote:
I did work specifically on data protection related to this very thing. For Google. It has a specific name.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 5:29 pm to Korkstand
quote:
What I said they do NOT do is simply put recently-visited pages in the #1 spot of search results, as you are claiming they did to all of us.
That's not what I was claiming. It's even why I didn't say for sure that was the reason for the search discrepancy. I merely suggested it as a not unlikely possibility.
I know you're a cargos and flip flop wearing coder for whoever the frick, so you're not dumb. That makes you one dishonest motherfricker.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 5:37 pm to GRTiger
quote:Well, I'm here to tell you that it is an extremely unlikely possibility. So unlikely as I would not call it a possibility at all. This "search discrepancy" you are referring to was 100% user error. You either misread some stuff, or you were looking at the wrong search tab, or you were on page 100 of the results or something. I can assure you that the #1 result for the search terms you provided did not change over the course of this conversation, much less your entire top 10 results.
That's not what I was claiming. It's even why I didn't say for sure that was the reason for the search discrepancy. I merely suggested it as a not unlikely possibility.
quote:Thanks for the... compliment?
I know you're a cargos and flip flop wearing coder for whoever the frick, so you're not dumb.
quote:Me?! How have I been dishonest? You're the one making claims here, not me. I've just been pointing out that your claims are not based in reality.
That makes you one dishonest motherfricker.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 5:37 pm to GRTiger
quote:
I know you're a cargos and flip flop wearing coder for whoever the frick, so you're not dumb. That makes you one dishonest motherfricker.
What?
Posted on 8/14/19 at 5:40 pm to MorbidTheClown
-This isn't really a news site.-*
You mean a real news site like The New York Times, CNN and MSNBC?
*I keep forgetting that sarcasm doesn't translate well online
You mean a real news site like The New York Times, CNN and MSNBC?
*I keep forgetting that sarcasm doesn't translate well online
This post was edited on 8/15/19 at 4:46 pm
Page 8 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News