re: For those seeking reinstatement to the site...

1. Jester
2. 8 months
3. no
4. I believe he was just taking arguments too far and making personal attacks
5. Probably
6. Jester promises to cool it down when he gets into debates. He is very argumentative and often rustles a few jimmies when arguing with people.
7. Admins are the bees knees. Chicken/Dhillip gave me another chance, give Jester another chance

quote:

---

Are there ever any reinstatements threads where these ARE considered?

---

not at this time

1. JAB528
2. Since Halloween 2013
3. Yes
4. Made a racist remark
5. No
6. Not gonna be a racist anymore
7. All hail the glorious admins

1.Tigahrag - LINK

2.Around 2 months

3. Not sure

4. I believe he accused admins of giving posters other posters IP address information

5. Not that I'm aware of

6. I can't speak on behalf of Rag, but he does a great job of keeping some posters in check. I believe that he is missed by a few people.

7. TigerDroppings, a universe of good and evil, where a small group struggles to bring freedom to the countless worlds of despair. A rag-tag band lead by the infamous Chicken.

1.) Fox Mulder

2.) Banned since early February.

3.) No

4.) I think it was something on the MSB board and possibly posting too much or tip toeing the line on sensitive material that's censored on this site.

5.) no

6.) He won't do it again.

7.) The admins do a fine job of making sure everybody is posting in a manner that's fair to all.



1.) Roaad

2.) This is just a welfare check as he hasn't posted since January and I have no idea if he's banned or not.

3.) No idea if he's ever been banned before.

4.) I don't even know if he's banned or not.

5.) If he got banned, I'm sure he's learned his lesson and won't do it again.

7.) The admins do a fine job of making sure everybody is posting in a manner that's fair to all.



1.) Blue Velvet

2.) Late february

3.) No

4.)He challenged an admin's "race baiting" and was banned for it.

5.) no.

6.) He won't do it again and he will pick his battles much more wisely in the future.

7.) The admins do a fine job of making sure everybody is posting in a manner that is fair to all.



1.) Roger Klarvin

2.) 2 months

3.) No

4.) Made a comment about the Vanderbilt Rape Case victim

5.) No

6.) Roger is sorry that his comment upset some of the posters and admins on tRant and promises not to comment on the Vanderbilt rape case in the future.

7.) The admins do a fine job of making sure everybody is posting in a manner that's fair to all.



1.) boosiebadazz

2.)banned since early december

3.)no

4.) lashed out at an admin in an inappropriate manner

5.) I'm not sure.

6.) He won't do it again and will go through the proper channels next time.

7.) The admins do a fine job of making sure everybody is posting in a manner that's fair to all.

quote:

---

not at this time

---

What you did there, I see

quote:

---

1.) Roger Klarvin

4.) Made a comment about the Vanderbilt Rape Case victim

---

did he mean what he posted?

quote:

---

well, since you are posting again, i would say yes

---

Trust me, I'm not posting again b/c of a reinstatment thread. I think everyone that vouched for me that day, with the exception of you, were accused of being my alter and banned.

It pays to be tight with certain admins.

BTW, I still don't think that other chick poster is an admin. I'm convinced some other admin was screwing with me

Chicken, maybe we can be friends again one day

quote:

---

You know him IRL?

---

nah. just reposted what was posted in the other thread

quote:

---

did he mean what he posted?

---

Absolutely not. He's very sorry for posting in such an insensitive manner about a very sensitive case on a board that's close to the situation and holds it dear to their heart. He will without a doubt refrain from posting in the aforementioned manner no matter what other situation may arise again in the future.