Started By
Message

re: Florida HS principal ousted for McKinney comments

Posted on 6/12/15 at 4:29 pm to
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87755 posts
Posted on 6/12/15 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

No, it can't be both ways. If a school is prevented from allowing any religion based on limitations of the Constitution then that same school cannot punish someone for exercising the right to free speech which is in the same constitution.



What?

Free speech isn't unlimited to begin with, much less absolute for teachers/administrators in the context of retaining their employment.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
74690 posts
Posted on 6/12/15 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

What?

Free speech isn't unlimited to begin with, much less absolute for teachers/administrators in the context of retaining their employment.



There are limits for sure. The "yelling fire in a movie theater" comes to mind. But in this instance, it's very cut and dry. He made a statement the powers that be over the school found politically objectionable and he's being punished for it. And since schools are subject to the first amendment, that means they're subject to all of the first amendment, not just the first few words.
This post was edited on 6/12/15 at 4:33 pm
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
62257 posts
Posted on 6/12/15 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

Black and white folks are different. Each likes and prefers different things in life. Why is this so hard to understand. It's not racist, it's just called life


Social experiment: stand by the door of any public school classroom in which school enrollment is close to 50/50 racially. Tell the students as they enter that they may sit where they choose. Allow all students in, close the door, take notes on how students are dispersed racially.
Posted by elposter
Member since Dec 2010
26752 posts
Posted on 6/12/15 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

Just as a school can't force anyone to pray, it cannot punish anyone simply for what they say.


Not exactly. The Supreme Court has placed pretty nuanced limits on the freedom of speech doctrine. In the case of a public employee subject to adverse action by a public employer, there are a lot of factors including whether the person was speaking as a "private citizen" or a "employee" as well as whether the restriction is content neutral.
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
23149 posts
Posted on 6/12/15 at 4:34 pm to
I'm fine with it, as long as all teachers, administrators, and public officials that made public statements siding with or condoning the riots in Ferguson and Baltimore be fired as well.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87755 posts
Posted on 6/12/15 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

There are limits for sure. The "yelling fire in a movie theater" comes to mind. But in this instance, it's very cut and dry. He made a statement the powers that be found politically objectionable and he's being punished for it. And since schools are subject to the first amendment, that means they're subject to all of the first amendment, not just the first few words.



I don't know what to tell you other than it doesn't really work like this.

The fact that religion isn't taught (endorsed) in school has little to do with a school board adjudging the propriety of an administrator's statements and considering how they will be perceived from a person in his/her position.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 6/12/15 at 4:41 pm to
Who could possibly be offended by what he said?
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
74690 posts
Posted on 6/12/15 at 4:42 pm to
So while the courts take a very broad and open ended stance on the first phase in the !st Amendment they take a very narrow and "nuanced" view on the second phase. Figures that shite like that would pass for "justice".
Posted by RodFarva
Spurbury, Vermont
Member since Jun 2015
807 posts
Posted on 6/12/15 at 4:45 pm to
I agree with their opinion. If individuals who acted in as elf entitled way because of something that ended 150 years ago would just get over it , it would be fine. Hell the Jews got over WWII
Posted by MrFreakinMiyagi
Reseda
Member since Feb 2007
20175 posts
Posted on 6/12/15 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

Darth_Vader

Holy shite

You are so fricking stupid
This post was edited on 6/12/15 at 4:51 pm
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
74690 posts
Posted on 6/12/15 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

Holy shite

You are so fricking stupid



Can't come up with anything intelligent to contribute as usual I see. What a fricking worthless idiot troll you are.
Posted by TDFreak
Coast to Coast - L.A. to Chicago
Member since Dec 2009
9435 posts
Posted on 6/12/15 at 5:28 pm to
Social Media strikes again!
Posted by StrongSafety
Member since Sep 2004
18000 posts
Posted on 6/12/15 at 5:35 pm to
These are the bigger issues :

Closet bigots and racist who are mostly smart enough to conceal their backwards and hateful views, but are in major positions of powers of black and brown folks.

Honestly, Iber should never work in academia ever again. I would look at everyone of his prior measures with huge scrutiny now.

The problem is that these folks don't think their bigotry will effect their work habits or how they treat others in a professional environment. It's one of the biggest fallacies we have going on in America.

Just because you're smart/rich/"successful" doesn't excuse you from being a shitty person. Your shitty side can always read it's ugly side. You're not immune to it
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
62257 posts
Posted on 6/12/15 at 5:44 pm to
Is it possible that he just saw the cop's actions as right, without regard to race? You're labeling him a closet, hate-filled bigot based on one statement. You are clearly right.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86757 posts
Posted on 6/12/15 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

It doesn't matter that he wasn't arrested. It's government action (assuming this was a public school) supressing speech. That doesn't mean that his first amendment right was violated, but the first amendment is very much in play here.


so wrong
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 6/12/15 at 5:51 pm to
You're such a fricking cornball pussy
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
93541 posts
Posted on 6/12/15 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

You're such a fricking cornball pussy



easy Girine
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84835 posts
Posted on 6/12/15 at 5:58 pm to
I really didn't think the video was that bad. And I don't think the principal's comments were offensive in any way.

I think people are losing their mind over racism. It's not surprising. People who internalize racism typically let emotions override their reason.
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
62257 posts
Posted on 6/12/15 at 5:59 pm to
This guy was removed from his position because his comments were interpreted as insensitive. Hell, I've had a ton of really fricking insensitive things said and done to me in my lifetime, with no consequences to the offender. Should I just go lie down in the corner in the fetal position.

No, he lost his position because his comments don't fit the PC social narrative of the day. Period.
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
93541 posts
Posted on 6/12/15 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

People who internalize racism typically let emotions override their reason.

Argentinian Gay Pride forever!
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram