Started By
Message

re: First FEMALE Marines Join Infantry Battalion

Posted on 1/7/17 at 6:03 am to
Posted by AthensTiger
Athens, GA
Member since Jul 2008
2977 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 6:03 am to
This social experiment crap makes me sick. Gen. Mattis please fix this.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 6:10 am to
quote:

Nah. frick these dudes. They just pissed that some women passed the same physical standards that they strapped to their own self identity and sense of masculinity.

Maybe they should just keep a tally of how many broads they've fricked and compare it to these women. (The women probably have fricked more broads than these swinging dicks)

At least they don't have periods though.


The only people who are seriously parroting women in combat units has never served, gullible people who who never really research their opinions to see if they're retarded or not and/or are huge cultural marxists.

It's not just medical issues that make women more expensive to take care of and blow cost benefit analysis reports the frick up as they require more female specific care, more medical services along with more staffing that specialize in female care.

It's also the fact that they are a very inefficient source of labor where 3 women doing one job together is very expensive while it can be easily done by one man and save a lot of money. The military should be about cost savings and efficiency, not expensive social experiments.

There's also the fraternization issue as men and women together do what men and women together do. Let's face it. When you put reasonably attravive adults into the same base together in remote locations for months without end, they are going to frick. Women want dick. Men want pussy. It's easily available to each other in that scenario.

You know what that's going to do to a mixed gender combat unit? It's going to destroy the social welfare, discipline and cohesiveness of the unit. The military has to be five united fingers forming a single fist and two wavering fingers with that man and woman fricking is a dangerous threat.

And then there's also the fact that the sexes are not equal. Women's bodies are just not designed for combat as they cannot pull their own weight whatsoever in battle compared to men and there is a world of difference in the physical tasks they can perform compared to the men. Woman that can even manage the most simple of physical tasks in combat are very few and far in between that it is not worth lifting the ban for them.

Women in combat should absolutely be banned forever because they are physically incapable of combat and handling the rigors it puts them through, they are a threat to discipline of military units, they are too expensive to care for and they are an inefficient source of labor.

You goddman moron.
Posted by chesty
Flap City C.C.
Member since Oct 2012
12731 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 6:37 am to
I figured they'd have been 0352/0351 since they're traditionally a bunch of do nothing bitches anyways
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 7:45 am to
Women shouldn't even be allowed in the military, much less the combat arms.
Posted by DeafJam73
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19122 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 7:56 am to
If this many military guys say it's a bad idea then I've definitly changed my mind.
Posted by PrivatePublic
Member since Nov 2012
17848 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 7:59 am to
quote:

New technology is being developed to make the physical toll easier on soldiers.


Even though you're wrong - if you weren't wrong, who typically handles technology better, men or women???
Posted by DeafJam73
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19122 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:02 am to
Read the post directly above yours.
Posted by chesty
Flap City C.C.
Member since Oct 2012
12731 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:04 am to
Admin and comms all day need females. I need something nice to look at when I go sign papers and get radio shite
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:07 am to
quote:

I have no idea


You should've stopped right here.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:15 am to
quote:

Admin and comms all day need females.
No, we don't NEED them.
quote:

need something nice to look at when I go sign papers and get radio shite
Then join the Air Force.

Did you know that every year 10% of females in the military who are scheduled to deploy cannot deploy because they get pregnant? That's got notthing to do with females in the combat arms. That's all the comm girls and secretaries. 10% of them at any one time are completely incapable of doing their jobs.
This post was edited on 1/7/17 at 8:17 am
Posted by Teufelhunden
Galvez, LA
Member since Feb 2005
6044 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:15 am to
I would be interested to know how they were given a slot at SOI. Speaking with former recruiters the 03xx occfld is practically all contracted. Meaning virtually zero 03xx slots are filled with open contract recruits. Rhetorical question I'm sure as these slots were given for political reasons.
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:22 am to
quote:

Admin and comms all day need females. I need something nice to look at when I go sign papers and get radio shite


I could understand admin. But comms? I hope you're only talking about comms at a rear echelon position. If they're comm for a line platoon then when shite inevitably hits the fan, in not so sure she'll be able to get her traffic across clearly.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:24 am to
Rear echelon.... front echelon. What's the difference. They all waste the same amount of taxpayer money. Their presence destroys families and causes disciplinary problems 100% of the time.
This post was edited on 1/7/17 at 8:25 am
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:27 am to
quote:

I would be interested to know how they were given a slot at SOI. Speaking with former recruiters the 03xx occfld is practically all contracted. Meaning virtually zero 03xx slots are filled with open contract recruits. Rhetorical question I'm sure as these slots were given for political reasons.



Apparently, during the initial phases of this bullshite, they were being asked in boot camp if they wanted to do an 03 package. They would do a regular 03 training and then go to their respective MOS's.

I remember going through SOI with female Marines. There were around 15 of them in the company. One got engaged to another guy in the company, one got pregnant, one hopped in a carful of NCO's from Camp Lejeune, two of them got lost doing land nav at night and had the whole company looking for them for hours only to find out they weren't really lost, they were just sleeping by a tree about 100 yards away from the company bivouac site. Only one of them passed the 20K and that was with the company 1Sgt dragging her through the finish line and none of them qualified shooting table 2 or whatever it is we shot over there. All but like one of them dropped.
Posted by chesty
Flap City C.C.
Member since Oct 2012
12731 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:35 am to
Unreal
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:36 am to
quote:

Unreal

No it's not. It's exactly what should be expected of women trying to be in the combat arms.
This post was edited on 1/7/17 at 8:36 am
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:36 am to
This doesn't make sense. LesMiles BFF said they passed all the same physical standards and it's just jealousy because they have bigger dicks...
Posted by olemc999
At a blackjack table
Member since Oct 2010
15407 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:39 am to
quote:

Did you know that every year 10% of females in the military who are scheduled to deploy cannot deploy because they get pregnant?


Only 10%. That's actually lower then what I thought it would be. My army unit had 6 of them drop out of our deployment to Iraq. 6 outta 9.
Posted by Dave lsu 89
B.R,/ Houston
Member since Jun 2016
3879 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:40 am to
Long has they to pass pt standard for males ok. But after 10 yes of svcs I want to make sure my battle buddy can have my back sooooo outstanding if in fact these females made it because a lot of good female soldiers are out there.
This post was edited on 1/7/17 at 8:42 am
Posted by OTIS2
NoLA
Member since Jul 2008
52751 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:41 am to
quote:

LesMiles BFF


frick you, shitass. Learn before you open your ignorant fricking mouth.
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram