- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: First FEMALE Marines Join Infantry Battalion
Posted on 1/7/17 at 6:03 am to TigerFanInSouthland
Posted on 1/7/17 at 6:03 am to TigerFanInSouthland
This social experiment crap makes me sick. Gen. Mattis please fix this.
Posted on 1/7/17 at 6:10 am to LesMiles BFF
quote:
Nah. frick these dudes. They just pissed that some women passed the same physical standards that they strapped to their own self identity and sense of masculinity.
Maybe they should just keep a tally of how many broads they've fricked and compare it to these women. (The women probably have fricked more broads than these swinging dicks)
At least they don't have periods though.
The only people who are seriously parroting women in combat units has never served, gullible people who who never really research their opinions to see if they're retarded or not and/or are huge cultural marxists.
It's not just medical issues that make women more expensive to take care of and blow cost benefit analysis reports the frick up as they require more female specific care, more medical services along with more staffing that specialize in female care.
It's also the fact that they are a very inefficient source of labor where 3 women doing one job together is very expensive while it can be easily done by one man and save a lot of money. The military should be about cost savings and efficiency, not expensive social experiments.
There's also the fraternization issue as men and women together do what men and women together do. Let's face it. When you put reasonably attravive adults into the same base together in remote locations for months without end, they are going to frick. Women want dick. Men want pussy. It's easily available to each other in that scenario.
You know what that's going to do to a mixed gender combat unit? It's going to destroy the social welfare, discipline and cohesiveness of the unit. The military has to be five united fingers forming a single fist and two wavering fingers with that man and woman fricking is a dangerous threat.
And then there's also the fact that the sexes are not equal. Women's bodies are just not designed for combat as they cannot pull their own weight whatsoever in battle compared to men and there is a world of difference in the physical tasks they can perform compared to the men. Woman that can even manage the most simple of physical tasks in combat are very few and far in between that it is not worth lifting the ban for them.
Women in combat should absolutely be banned forever because they are physically incapable of combat and handling the rigors it puts them through, they are a threat to discipline of military units, they are too expensive to care for and they are an inefficient source of labor.
You goddman moron.
Posted on 1/7/17 at 6:37 am to TigerFanInSouthland
I figured they'd have been 0352/0351 since they're traditionally a bunch of do nothing bitches anyways
Posted on 1/7/17 at 7:45 am to chesty
Women shouldn't even be allowed in the military, much less the combat arms.
Posted on 1/7/17 at 7:56 am to GeauxxxTigers23
If this many military guys say it's a bad idea then I've definitly changed my mind.
Posted on 1/7/17 at 7:59 am to DeafJam73
quote:
New technology is being developed to make the physical toll easier on soldiers.
Even though you're wrong - if you weren't wrong, who typically handles technology better, men or women???
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:02 am to PrivatePublic
Read the post directly above yours.
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:04 am to GeauxxxTigers23
Admin and comms all day need females. I need something nice to look at when I go sign papers and get radio shite
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:07 am to DeafJam73
quote:
I have no idea
You should've stopped right here.
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:15 am to chesty
quote:No, we don't NEED them.
Admin and comms all day need females.
quote:Then join the Air Force.
need something nice to look at when I go sign papers and get radio shite
Did you know that every year 10% of females in the military who are scheduled to deploy cannot deploy because they get pregnant? That's got notthing to do with females in the combat arms. That's all the comm girls and secretaries. 10% of them at any one time are completely incapable of doing their jobs.
This post was edited on 1/7/17 at 8:17 am
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:15 am to TigerFanInSouthland
I would be interested to know how they were given a slot at SOI. Speaking with former recruiters the 03xx occfld is practically all contracted. Meaning virtually zero 03xx slots are filled with open contract recruits. Rhetorical question I'm sure as these slots were given for political reasons.
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:22 am to chesty
quote:
Admin and comms all day need females. I need something nice to look at when I go sign papers and get radio shite
I could understand admin. But comms? I hope you're only talking about comms at a rear echelon position. If they're comm for a line platoon then when shite inevitably hits the fan, in not so sure she'll be able to get her traffic across clearly.
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:24 am to TigerFanInSouthland
Rear echelon.... front echelon. What's the difference. They all waste the same amount of taxpayer money. Their presence destroys families and causes disciplinary problems 100% of the time.
This post was edited on 1/7/17 at 8:25 am
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:27 am to Teufelhunden
quote:
I would be interested to know how they were given a slot at SOI. Speaking with former recruiters the 03xx occfld is practically all contracted. Meaning virtually zero 03xx slots are filled with open contract recruits. Rhetorical question I'm sure as these slots were given for political reasons.
Apparently, during the initial phases of this bullshite, they were being asked in boot camp if they wanted to do an 03 package. They would do a regular 03 training and then go to their respective MOS's.
I remember going through SOI with female Marines. There were around 15 of them in the company. One got engaged to another guy in the company, one got pregnant, one hopped in a carful of NCO's from Camp Lejeune, two of them got lost doing land nav at night and had the whole company looking for them for hours only to find out they weren't really lost, they were just sleeping by a tree about 100 yards away from the company bivouac site. Only one of them passed the 20K and that was with the company 1Sgt dragging her through the finish line and none of them qualified shooting table 2 or whatever it is we shot over there. All but like one of them dropped.
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:36 am to chesty
quote:
Unreal
This post was edited on 1/7/17 at 8:36 am
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:36 am to TigerFanInSouthland
This doesn't make sense. LesMiles BFF said they passed all the same physical standards and it's just jealousy because they have bigger dicks...
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:39 am to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Did you know that every year 10% of females in the military who are scheduled to deploy cannot deploy because they get pregnant?
Only 10%. That's actually lower then what I thought it would be. My army unit had 6 of them drop out of our deployment to Iraq. 6 outta 9.
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:40 am to TigerFanInSouthland
Long has they to pass pt standard for males ok. But after 10 yes of svcs I want to make sure my battle buddy can have my back sooooo outstanding if in fact these females made it because a lot of good female soldiers are out there.
This post was edited on 1/7/17 at 8:42 am
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:41 am to LesMiles BFF
quote:
LesMiles BFF
frick you, shitass. Learn before you open your ignorant fricking mouth.
Popular
Back to top


0





