Started By
Message

re: Fire fighting needs to be rethunk

Posted on 4/12/18 at 11:22 am to
Posted by Fratigerguy
Member since Jan 2014
4975 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 11:22 am to
quote:

Does each station need a chief?


Does not =

quote:

St. Tammany Parish has 13 fire districts, and the Covington Fire Department, and each one has a chief.


You’re talking fire districts. Not stations. Don’t know the total number of stations, but it is far more than that.

And to your question about what is required...state law requires you have a district chief per every 4 stations, an assistant chief over multiple districts, a deputy chief over assistant chiefs, and a fire chief over the department. That’s what the law states. Don’t like that? Contact your senator or representative and tell them to change the law because you don’t see the need for supervision or structure.
Posted by LSUJML
Central
Member since May 2008
56850 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 11:40 am to
quote:

I wonder how much salary/benefits each chief draws


My dad retired as a chief, he still had a part time job.
The title doesn't mean a huge salary.
Posted by mikie421
continental shelf
Member since Nov 2008
879 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 11:43 am to
quote:

LSUcajun77


The Stache is watching you
Posted by Chuker
St George, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2015
7544 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 11:44 am to
quote:

What would that ratio look like if we had less fire fighters? I'd guess damages would go up significantly.



I doubt it would go up exponentially. Most fires result in the total loss of a home even if they put the fire out. Smoke damage + water = big insurance check.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 11:45 am to
It's all about your insurance.
Posted by Chuker
St George, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2015
7544 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 11:50 am to
quote:

If we just look at the 346,150 at an average base salary of $50k....not including medical, pension, and other expenses

346k X 50k = at least 17.3 billion vs 7 billion in damage.



I agree with you but you're attacking a sacred institution. My county is failing economically and losing tons of residents. We still pay millions in fire protection. Seems like they put out 2 vacant home and 4 trailerhouse fires a year. Of course they are all destroyed by the time the fire is out. I guarantee the tax payers pay wayyyy more in protection than property saved.

I can understand fire protection for cities with close buildings though. Putting out those fires would actually save the surrounding properties.
Posted by OptionRight
Down da skreet
Member since Sep 2010
852 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 12:13 pm to
Your situation is different. Rural firefighting has largely survived on volunteer work to do the lions share of the service. When residents leave and tax dollars wane....you have to cut back but it’s up to the officials to be fiscally responsible and yet still mitigate the needs...it’s a balancing act that makes it imperative to have a smart, forward thinking, problem solver in charge....stretch the dollars, utilize federal grants and operate within their means to protect the community. This specific dynamic is complex and takes a lot of hard work not only from the fire dept but the community as well.
Posted by BabyCakes
Northshore
Member since Nov 2016
110 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

And to your question about what is required...state law requires you have a district chief per every 4 stations, an assistant chief over multiple districts, a deputy chief over assistant chiefs, and a fire chief over the department. That’s what the law states.


Thanks for your advice on the law and how to change it. This thread is about whether we need to rethink the current structure. Is it your position that we need thirteen different chiefs in St. Tammany Parish? The St. Tammany Parish Sheriff's Office has over 700 employees and only one chief. Somehow, they manage to function.
Posted by OptionRight
Down da skreet
Member since Sep 2010
852 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 12:17 pm to
Also Chuker I will add that you cannot gauge actual events with preparedness for specific exposures. IE: industrial situations, schools, healthcare facilities, etc. all of that potential must be taken into consideration. Another option rural depts Have is cooperation and assistance from other counties as well, but I get what you are saying, on the surface it appears wasteful.
Posted by Morty
Member since Feb 2018
2252 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 12:17 pm to
This question might beling in own thread but it seems to be a trend to thank firefighters for their “service” the way people rightly do with veterans and current servicemen.

It’s not the same. It’s a pretty cushy job that lots of people want to have and they get paid pretty well for it.
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

I doubt it would go up exponentially. Most fires result in the total loss of a home even if they put the fire out. Smoke damage + water = big insurance check.

Most fires result in the total loss of only ONE home because the firefighters were also preventing nearby houses from touching off while they were trying to put out the fire.

Ask Chicago and Mrs. O'Leary's cow what happens when a fire touches off without adequate fire protection to stop it.

Now, this won't happen as readily in rural areas, but in those circumstances, reduced fire protection is going to drive your insurance rates up. So, you either pay the insurance company because you don't have fire protection or you pay taxes to have a fire department that can try to save your property. One way or another, you're paying.
This post was edited on 4/12/18 at 1:01 pm
Posted by Fratigerguy
Member since Jan 2014
4975 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

Thanks for your advice on the law and how to change it


No problem. I’m always willing to help the ill-informed.

quote:

The St. Tammany Parish Sheriff's Office has over 700 employees and only one chief. Somehow, they manage to function.


Along with the Slidell police, Mandeville police, Madesonville police, Folsom police, Pearl River police, and Covington police departments and all of their chiefs.

Look, I don’t expect you to understand or know why there are individual fire districts, like there are individual police departments, but at least try to understand the reasons for it instead of just assuming you know the answers and demanding change.

But I’ll try to give you a short answer (relatively speaking) and hopefully you’ll think about it with an open mind.

First, there is zero doubt that in some cases the districts are split up because of personal feelings and unwillingness to do things someone else’s way. You can see that all over LA. In those cases, it isn’t necessarily in the public’s best interest to do those things. However, the public continues to vote for these things. A fire district can’t just pop up, say we’re now serving you, and you have to pay us X to do it. Now that we have that out of the way...

A fire department’s or district’s rating...class 1,2,3, etc directly affects how much you pay on your homeowners insurance. A large part of that rating is determined by the distance between stations and their ability to respond in the district to a call. It’s also affected by their ability to have X numbers of firefighters on a scene in X amount of time when called. Fire departments don’t set that number or time. Since I don’t know the exact layout of St Tammany, I’ll use EBR as the example, although I’d assume that the two are pretty similar in terms of distribution of population. The city of BR is a class 1 department. The next largest, St George, is a class 2. In terms of homeowners insurance rating, there is no difference really. The residents of that area pay well for their fire protection and see a savings on their insurance because of it, as well as the peace of mind knowing they can have a truck on scene in a couple minutes when they call. The populations in those two fire districts are the largest and most condensed. There is a necessity for having a station every so many miles to be able to respond. In addition, there are many large structures that require the ability to have several trucks and personnel on scene to not only mitigate the issue, but to comply with rating requirements. Having a station every 4 miles on greenwell springs road, for example, along with a minimum of 3 personnel on every truck to comply with ratings, would cost the taxpayers LOTS more in the way of taxes. The 10% of the population that live in those sparsely populated areas would see a benefit in terms of response times and insurance, but it would be done on the backs of the 90% having to pay 3-4 times what they do now. So, the residents of those areas pay accordingly to the service they are provided. While it may seem like bloated government, and in some cases it is, fire protection really is one of the few areas where taxpayers actually get what they pay for, instead of having their money go to others in other areas. There simply is zero need to man an area and have the maintenance costs and everything else that goes with it for 30 square miles that has 10-20% of the population that say, the city of Slidell has. When you look at a particular parish, you can see how the population distribution is broken up. The level of service needed in the city isn’t the same as the level of service needed in the area with 2 stop signs, no red light, and a house every 10 acres. While it is nice to try to compare officers vs firefighters and staffing numbers, the two are not really similar, other than they are both paid through tax dollars.
Posted by White Bear
Homeless
Member since Jul 2014
17815 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

So, you either pay the insurance company because you don't have fire protection or you pay taxes to have a fire department that can try to save your property. One way or another, you're paying.
But it seems we pay both currently. Drive around Bossier City and view the monstrosities that are the new fire houses. The sherriff is out of control as well.
Posted by Fratigerguy
Member since Jan 2014
4975 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

This question might beling in own thread but it seems to be a trend to thank firefighters for their “service” the way people rightly do with veterans and current servicemen.


I always feel uncomfortable when someone does this, and I don’t agree with it. I am not in the military, and in my opinion, do not deserve a “thanks” for my doing my job. That’s just my opinion on it. I’m also not a big fan of dickbags who like to toot their own horn because they did their job.

quote:

It’s a pretty cushy job that lots of people want to have and they get paid pretty well for it.


If you only knew...we have trouble, and have for years, in trying to fill classes with rookies. They certainly aren’t beating down the doors to come in.

As to pay, I work an average of 56 hours per week (overtime is only figured after 53 hours for firefighters), and after 15 years I make about half of what a plant baw makes after 6 months. And in the state of LA, for my years of service and rank, I make very well comparative to other departments. So...if you figure that is getting paid pretty well, there are classes starting every year! And oh yeah, my health insurance is through my wife because I can’t stomach the $700 per month for my family that we are provided through work. And 10% of my check comes off the top and goes to my retirement. And I don’t get any extra pay to work Christmas, thanksgiving, Easter, none of that. Living high on the hog, I tell ya! Understand though, I’m not complaining. Only trying to inform. I chose this profession.
Posted by Chuker
St George, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2015
7544 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

OptionRight



you must be autistic
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
48185 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 3:32 pm to
I definitely think that they could scale back on the amount of firestations and trucks. For instance, in opelousas alone we have at least 4 firestations all within a couple of miles of each other. A little unnecessary... But another thing is that the insurance rating for homeowners is based on the fire stations and also the water system capabilities... So you may end up paying more for insurance.
Posted by CCTider
Member since Dec 2014
25240 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

overed by fire retardant gypsum board


Not required in residential construction.


Except at firewalls in multifamily buildings.
Posted by CCTider
Member since Dec 2014
25240 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 5:04 pm to
I think we need to return to the old days, and privatize fire departments. I want to see crews fight in the streets like in Gangs of New York. Not only would it be cool to watch. But metal band would film some great music videos.
Posted by 16Capt
Northshore
Member since Sep 2011
442 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 5:10 pm to
You know way more than some of these folks, particularly the op. Keep fighting the good fight. Maybe we should slow down on banging these married women while their dumbass men are at work in their cubicle.
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161246 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 5:12 pm to
Kuho fails again
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram