Started By
Message

re: Fiddy Cent Bids A-Deuces to Shreveport

Posted on 7/14/26 at 11:55 pm to
Posted by BlackAdam
Member since Jan 2016
7236 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 11:55 pm to
quote:

To be fair, if he thought he could build Tyler Perry Studios in Shreveport, it doesn’t work because of the state’s obtuse reactionary “related party transaction” rules.


This is one of the single dumbest things I have ever seen on this site, which is kind of remarkable.

Related party transactions were a source of massive fraud in the film and DM programs before the state hired people with financial backgrounds to administer those programs. Those related party transactions and mandatory withholding eliminated tens of millions of dollars in fraudulent tax credit issuances.

I wish I were exaggerating, but I would frequently have fly by night productions come to me for tax credit projections to get loans against the future credits, and the budgets were 15 or 20% related party producer fees which is absurd. Those transactions had no valid business purpose but to create tax credits.

Posted by BlackAdam
Member since Jan 2016
7236 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 11:57 pm to
quote:

i never understood why he wanted to invest there.


Because he thought he was going to get $50 million from the state with very few strings attached.
Posted by MyRockstarComplex
The airport
Member since Nov 2009
5126 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 6:09 am to
quote:

This is one of the single dumbest things I have ever seen on this site, which is kind of remarkable.


Thanks.

So as it presently stands you don’t think this set of rules overreaches and disincentivizes long term investment in the state?

I’m not arguing that a bunch of bad actors didn’t abuse the system in its heyday, and we can all have a laugh about the names of the loopholes (the Eddie Furlong is my favorite), but there were ways to tighten it up that did not have to be as knee jerky.

In the off chance you are in fact the guy who wrote the rules (and taught me the Furlong) by all means please text me so we can have a laugh. Stare at my user name until it makes sense.

Edit: to be fair to your point, above the line fees are indeed a problem. I’m talking about investment in infrastructure and equipment. 50 did learn from EFO so that might be an issue.
This post was edited on 7/15/26 at 6:31 am
Posted by Hangit
The Green Swamp
Member since Aug 2014
47316 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 6:29 am to
He's right. Ruston is mor conducive to the "putting on your work boots" and pull yourself up mentality.
Posted by turnpiketiger
Member since May 2020
12336 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 6:37 am to
Not surprised at all. This whole thing never made sense to me any way.

How delusional do you think he was to think he could revive a decaying Deep South city? It takes much more than just buying up properties and building new buildings.
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
183943 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 6:53 am to
quote:


I really believe Memphis would be a better candidate for 50 Cent to do this than Shreveport due to the zero state income tax, the city willing to work with Trump to lower crime with the national guard, Memphis BBQ, and the music tradition.



I think he was going to get a shitload of film tax credits in Louisiana
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
40863 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 7:27 am to
He should try Jackson Ms.
Posted by Donkus
Shreveport
Member since Feb 2013
1613 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 7:50 am to
quote:

The speculation is that this is more targeted towards the Red River District and not the plan as a whole. He owns about 10 buildings/properties, so he’ll either sell those or continue to pay property taxes.


He wants the city to bring the buildings in the District up to code, repair leaks, and pay for any mold remediation before leasing. Since the city owns those and should be responsible for any maintenance, I'm with 50 on this one.
Posted by The Torch
DFW The Dub
Member since Aug 2014
30190 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 8:00 am to
The first time I heard he was investing in Shreveport I thought, what an idiot.

Well Well Well
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
19800 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 9:05 am to
quote:

“There are people in Shreveport that just don’t want things to get better.



That would be pretty much every black Democrat trying to get some cash funneled into their grubby hands. Probably threatened him with lawsuits if he didn't kickback some money into their organizations.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
19800 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 9:11 am to
quote:

the city willing to work with Trump to lower crime with the national guard,


The city? You do realize the city (as far as its black Democrat leadership is concerned) never wanted and still doesn't want the MSTF here. The state had to force that onto Memphis leaders.

quote:

Memphis BBQ


Way over-rated.

quote:

and the music tradition.


Mumble rap and the sound of gun shots punctuate the nights even more than Shreveport....
.
Posted by BlackAdam
Member since Jan 2016
7236 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 9:18 am to
quote:

So as it presently stands you don’t think this set of rules overreaches and disincentivizes long term investment in the state?


No. The whole statute disincentives long term investment in the state. No viable film company will set up shop outside of LA or NYC as long as they can get no strings attached money from 45 other states and nations around the world. Film credits are a constant race to the bottom. Nothing about the statute or rules in any form ever would have led to a sustained film industry, and anything that would lead to a sustained industry wouldn't be well received.

And as terrible as film credits are in general, when the state restricted related party producer and finance fees, the quality of productions increased. The program attracted people in the business of making movies and chased out people who were in the business of making tax credits.

And sure, studios will sign up for long term deals when you offer enough, but they will stop bringing in production as soon as the flow of money stops. This has been proven everywhere. This has been the case everywhere.

quote:

50 did learn from EFO so that might be an issue.


I think you are hitting the nail on the head. Getting those guys to move on added years to the life of the incentive.
Posted by MRTigerFan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
7255 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 9:44 am to
quote:

pumping the breaks

Louisiana politics strike again to halt progress. It's always something.
In Shreveport they be pumping the breaks.
In New Orleans they be breaking the pumps.

Posted by MRTigerFan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
7255 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 9:44 am to
quote:

pumping the breaks

Louisiana politics strike again to halt progress. It's always something.
In Shreveport they be pumping the breaks.
In New Orleans they be breaking the pumps.

Posted by rockford177
Virginia
Member since Feb 2008
826 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 9:49 am to
You know Cleo Fields and the rest of the democrats had their hands out….
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
19800 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 9:56 am to
Every black-owned NGO and contractor was clamoring for a piece of the action. Same reason why Xai is getting sued in Memphis by the usual suspects, Elon ignored the local NAACP extortion racket.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
139139 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 11:02 am to
It’s wild how people don’t see the inherent tendencies of certain demographics.

I saw an article about how the group leading the effort to recall Jeff Landry was dissolving because of disputes over money. It’s two black women at the helm.

Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
139139 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 11:03 am to
quote:

You know Cleo Fields and the rest of the democrats had their hands out….

There was no hand out. There was a gun to the head.
Posted by SoggyCerealClub
Member since Apr 2026
182 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 11:09 am to
quote:

I saw an article about how the group leading the effort to recall Jeff Landry

Besides the fact that the leader is a certified lunatic, a donor offered $100,000 for the recall that came with some stipulations. The leader- the Marion woman- refused it because she didn’t want to follow their stipulations on HER recall effort.
Posted by Triple Bogey
19th Green
Member since May 2017
6833 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 11:10 am to
quote:


It’s wild how people don’t see the inherent tendencies of certain demographics.


If you could have seen some of the comments under 50s instagram post a while back..

One of them said "I'm thankful he's investing in the city, but he hasn't done anything for me" Like they want him just walking around Cedar Grove handing money out
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram