Started By
Message

re: FBI officially Investigating California shooting as a act of terrorism

Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:41 pm to
Posted by Smoke7024
Member since Jun 2010
24083 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:41 pm to
what would you call it then?
Posted by beaver
The 755 Club
Member since Sep 2009
46861 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:41 pm to
I'm wondering why LA police had looked up Syed Farook a week or two ago...the very beginning of the police scanner they were saying this guy had been on LAPD radar recently
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
134675 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:41 pm to
quote:

Everyone screaming for this to be labeled terrorism while shite is on going are probably the same one who were saying wait for an investigation to happen in Fuerguson.



Because those were obviously the same thing...
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477375 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:41 pm to
quote:

Everyone screaming for this to be labeled terrorism while shite is on going

the FBI knows if this is terrorism or not already

they won't even release the names of those involved

the CAIR press conference earlier had to be force-muted b/c names were being dropped

information is being purposefully withheld from the public. tehre is a reason for that
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
68551 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:42 pm to
Can someone give me quick recap?

3 suspects, 3 Muslims? 2 male and 1 female? No connection to the building in any way?
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
40869 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:42 pm to
quote:

Probably just poorly made and did not work properly.



I honestly have no clue. It will be cleared up by tomorrow if there were any actual devices, fakes, or duds.

Of course, duds is the most worrisome since it could have been worse if they worked.
Posted by Chillini
Member since Sep 2012
3153 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:42 pm to
quote:

Everyone screaming for this to be labeled terrorism while shite is on going are probably the same one who were saying wait for an investigation to happen in Fuerguson.

Oh so you're saying these people were right on both counts.
Posted by SouljaBreauxTellEm
Mizz
Member since Aug 2009
29343 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:43 pm to
quote:

My guess is it was a bit of both so I'm not protecting these numbnuts on TV. His employment made the target familiar and easy for him and was inspired by radical jihadists.


provide me more detail about the woman with him?

why did she go along with it?? this guy was married right? not to her..

how is her involvement not terror
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
80103 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:43 pm to
quote:

Everyone screaming for this to be labeled terrorism


Nope, dipshit, most were screaming for the release of names and demographics.
Posted by PurpleandGold Motown
Birmingham, Alabama
Member since Oct 2007
24394 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:43 pm to
quote:

the CAIR press conference earlier had to be force-muted b/c names were being dropped


Muted on CNN. Not on FOX. I had both going at the same time.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477375 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:44 pm to
quote:

Muted on CNN. Not on FOX

Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
40869 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:44 pm to
1 male Arab Muslim dead
1 female arab muslim dead
1 unknown in custody which I haven't seen an update beyond saying law enforcement doesn't know if they are involved or not.
Posted by PurpleandGold Motown
Birmingham, Alabama
Member since Oct 2007
24394 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:44 pm to
quote:

why did she go along with it?? this guy was married right? not to her..



Not married. His sister is married to the brother in law.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
26608 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:45 pm to
quote:

Muted on CNN. Not on FOX. I had both going at the same time.


WTF?!?

CNN blows.
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
40869 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:45 pm to
quote:

provide me more detail about the woman with him?

why did she go along with it?? this guy was married right? not to her..

how is her involvement not terror



You aren't following.

What I am saying is his employment with the county/government may have made the target more familiar to him to carry out the terrorist act.

Just like Ft. Hood.
Posted by OldHickory
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2012
10822 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:45 pm to
Age 20, male, devout Muslim...what statues can we take down?
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
177381 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:45 pm to
What did they mute? Was it names.. What was the context
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
80103 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:46 pm to
Initially thought 3 accomplices, now seem to be backing off to only two, a husband and wife. Husband was a devout Muslim. Probably terrorism but media is scrambling, along with the politicians on the Left in the background, to obscure that motive with workplace violence or some shite.
Posted by MrLarson
Member since Oct 2014
34984 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:46 pm to
quote:

Not married. His sister is married to the brother in law.


They frick goats on the reg, what does marriage status matter?
Posted by beaver
The 755 Club
Member since Sep 2009
46861 posts
Posted on 12/2/15 at 11:46 pm to
quote:

Not married.


on his FB it said he is married and has kids

ETA and his wife looked white
This post was edited on 12/2/15 at 11:47 pm
Jump to page
Page First 129 130 131 132 133 ... 212
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 131 of 212Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram