Started By
Message

Fastest Suicide In History

Posted on 7/5/25 at 6:28 am
Posted by BeatingU
Member since Jul 2025
231 posts
Posted on 7/5/25 at 6:28 am


Nobody is coming close to this nut. Watched Netflix documentary released in June. This mofo was a total psychopath with a deathwish. The thing was constantly cracking and popping on test dives to smaller depths. Their test models all imploded at 3000 psi during testing, but still scaled up. Like WTF does that? A suicidal nut, that's who.

I think didn't care if he dies in the end because he realized he was a failure as a designer/businessman and was running out of money. He wanted to be famous and successful so very bad, but he knew he couldn't do either. So he decided to keep diving in that trashcan till it imploded. Also took some billionaires along with him to add to the headlines.

They only had 13 successful dives to Titanic before the implosion and total of 87 dives at various depths. For reference, James Cameron made 33 dives to Titanic on Russia's MIR submersibles.

Here's a neflix stream upload in HD:

https://moviesjoytv.to/watch-movie/titan-the-oceangate-disaster-126619.12368326


This post was edited on 7/5/25 at 6:31 am
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
69654 posts
Posted on 7/5/25 at 6:30 am to
ISWYDT.
Posted by BeatingU
Member since Jul 2025
231 posts
Posted on 7/5/25 at 6:54 am to
In the documentary it mentions how they found a crack in the hull after one of the dives, so they redid the tube again.

But Rush fired the chief engineer and blamed him for the "defect". lol
This guy was straight up suicidal psycho.
Posted by TheDonald
Washington DC
Member since Dec 2024
546 posts
Posted on 7/5/25 at 7:16 am to
I watched the Netflix documentary and I must say that it does not reflect well on this man. He seemed like a narcissist and a spoiled rich one at that.

Deadly combination. It’s a shame it was deadly to others as well.
This post was edited on 7/5/25 at 7:19 am
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
135879 posts
Posted on 7/5/25 at 7:57 am to
Died doing what he loved. Being a fool.



No way, i would squeeze into a tin can with no room to move around.
Posted by Cotten
Tennessee
Member since Jan 2018
1744 posts
Posted on 7/5/25 at 8:22 am to
quote:

No way, i would squeeze into a tin can with no room to move around.

…And it wasn’t even primarily metal. He used carbon fiber which everyone on the planet in the field warned him would work until it instantly didn’t, numerous times. Documentary made it seem everyone actually involved in this mess knew it was a ticking time bomb.
Posted by BeatingU
Member since Jul 2025
231 posts
Posted on 7/5/25 at 8:36 am to
quote:

Documentary made it seem everyone actually involved in this mess knew it was a ticking time bomb.


Everyone did warn him, and then he sued them or threatened them or stopped talking to them. Many quit or were fired.

The guy wasn't even of average intelligence. It doesn't take a smart person to realize carbon fiber threads with embedded epoxy aren't going to fair well against compression. Carbon fiber is pretty good vs tension forces, which is why it's used for oxygen tanks to save weight, because the pressure is coming from the inside and creating tension on the threads which this material fairs well against. Fibers with epoxy do not like to be compressed- they deform, delaminate, expand, and crack. It'll never be of consistent quality after each pressure cycle.

You don't have to have a physics degree or material science engineering background to know it was never going to work.
Posted by BeatingU
Member since Jul 2025
231 posts
Posted on 7/5/25 at 8:50 am to
quote:

I watched the Netflix documentary and I must say that it does not reflect well on this man. He seemed like a narcissist and a spoiled rich one at that.

Deadly combination. It’s a shame it was deadly to others as well.


Evidence points that he was a suicidal nutcase. His small scale tests all failed under 4000 psi while Titanic depth requires withstanding 5500 psi, so instead of quitting that approach and looking at alternatives, he just sent it full scale. Cause you know if your model fails under less pressure, your larger model will be just fine with even more pressure. /s His engineer said they should test it without anybody in it, but he wanted to be inside of it. If that's not a death wish, I don't know what is. Maybe he was excited to play the Russian implosion roulette every time.


Everyone who was on it said it was crackling and popping making everyone uneasy. The snaps you hear on his self recorded video of 1st deep test dive at 3900 meters are chilling. I'd be grateful if I came back from that and never go near it again. But he just called it "seasoning" of the hull. On dive 80 they heard a bang while ascending back, but after surfacing and inspecting it, they just left it out in the winter till next dive, which was the last dive. It probably developed another crack like it did previously, but instead of inspecting the fool rationalized that "submarines make noises at some point".

Utter insanity.

This post was edited on 7/5/25 at 8:52 am
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
36900 posts
Posted on 7/5/25 at 8:54 am to
quote:

They only had 13 successful dives to Titanic


you gloss over this but this is what’s so wild to me…this moron in his tin can made it to the Titanic successfully 13 times
Posted by FAT SEXY
California
Member since Jun 2020
1424 posts
Posted on 7/5/25 at 8:56 am to
Stockton Rush might be the biggest D-Bag name ever conceived
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
70979 posts
Posted on 7/5/25 at 8:57 am to
That part is wild. The fact that he made it there and back once is absolutely incredible. 13 times though?
Posted by Split2874
Mandeville
Member since Jul 2012
3217 posts
Posted on 7/5/25 at 9:25 am to
His carbon fiber design worked like it was supposed to. The fibers were to start breaking to let them know it was time to bail. But he ignored that. I was surprised to learn they had 10 + successful dives before , that just fed his ego.
Posted by cymark
Member since Oct 2015
207 posts
Posted on 7/5/25 at 9:30 am to
The storing it outside in the dead of a Candadian winter blew my mind. Likely 10’s of millions of dollars invested and they threw a tarp over it and kept outside. What could go wrong???
Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
30235 posts
Posted on 7/5/25 at 9:52 am to
It’s unfortunate that it didn’t implode on one of his test dives with just him in it.
Posted by BeatingU
Member since Jul 2025
231 posts
Posted on 7/5/25 at 9:56 am to
quote:

you gloss over this but this is what’s so wild to me…this moron in his tin can made it to the Titanic successfully 13 times


It was probably "safe"-ish for 1 time use. But that means he made a disposable deepsea submersible.

Each dive after that was a Russian roulette.
Posted by BeatingU
Member since Jul 2025
231 posts
Posted on 7/5/25 at 10:00 am to
quote:

It’s unfortunate that it didn’t implode on one of his test dives with just him in it.


Wouldn't even be a tragedy, more of a dark humored anecdote.
Posted by BeatingU
Member since Jul 2025
231 posts
Posted on 7/5/25 at 10:06 am to
quote:

His carbon fiber design worked like it was supposed to. The fibers were to start breaking to let them know it was time to bail.


So he should have bailed on the 1st dive basically.

You definitely don't want to have your hull breaking in any way when under compression with you in it. It means you picked the wrong material for the job and a wrong design.
Posted by Water
Louisiana
Member since Jan 2020
1130 posts
Posted on 7/5/25 at 10:39 am to
quote:

Also took some billionaires along with him to add to the headlines


And a 19 year old with his whole life ahead of him.

His mom was supposed to be on the trip with his dad but she gave him her spot because he got excited about the idea.

Having billions doesn’t undo her decision and bring her son back.

Money can’t fix every problem.
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
28313 posts
Posted on 7/5/25 at 10:46 am to
quote:

storing it outside in the dead of a Candadian winter blew my mind.


That was crazy to me. Even setting aside the potential safety risks that outdoor sub-zero weather elements could cause, why would you spend millions of dollars on something and just leave it sitting outside in the freezing cold weather?… just seems like common sense to store it inside.
This post was edited on 7/5/25 at 10:50 am
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78227 posts
Posted on 7/5/25 at 11:00 am to
i remember at the time watching all the interviews with him being like “we’re breaking all of the rules and pioneering new tech” and thinking that was fricking insane

and then i watched the docs and saw really how fricking insane he was

He didn’t get it certified or inspected by any of the 3rd party agencies

He didn’t have it flagged with any country

He left wet out in sub zero temps

He kept firing pilots and trying to name random female employees the new pilot

And all of that was for tje shittiest little tube with barely a window to see the titanic

and it isn’t like it was cheap… only multimillion billionionaires could afford this

so why go with this “cheap” sub?

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram