- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/21/20 at 2:19 pm to sabes que
Another question related to this is of course. Where is all this money coming from? 32 million people receiving $2,400 a month from the federal government alone, is a lot of money. Are we just printing money? What could this do to inflation?
Posted on 7/21/20 at 2:20 pm to sabes que
Good, the 600 lasted longer than needed. No more sitting home with a 100% pay raise
Posted on 7/21/20 at 2:50 pm to blades8088
It’s not ending maybe reduced a little
Posted on 7/21/20 at 2:53 pm to Box Geauxrilla
Yep I was filling out the work in Texas shite for 3 weeks. Then got an email saying that they would continue to NOT enforce it. frick that site. Crashed ever 5 mins
Posted on 7/21/20 at 3:58 pm to sabes que
quote:
But it’s not like people who double or tripled thieve incomes and went on spending sprees were doing it altruistically to help the economy, at least not in 99.9 percent of cases.
Well, that's a bullshite excuse, but why should it matter if they had altruistic motives?
The end result is that money got put back in the economy, so that only 40 million people lost jobs instead of 100 million.
Posted on 7/21/20 at 3:59 pm to sabes que
quote:
is a lot of money. Are we just printing money? What could this do to inflation?
Still cheaper than the Iraq war or the wall street bailout.
Posted on 7/21/20 at 4:11 pm to wadewilson
They have no ability to truly control who needs it because their actual job is closed or who is sitting home drawing money and not willing to do some work.
I hate it for some but the longer it draws out the worst things will be. It can't become an extension of social welfare. We have already seen what that creates.
The big deal was the extension to contractors versus employees and the volume of people impacted that don't directly pay into unemployment.
Walking in Walmart the day after the Trump stipends started to hit and weeks after the unemployment kicked in and not seeing a tv on the shelf and people shopping like it was Christmas. It will be interesting to see 2nd quarter numbers for Walmart and Home Depot.
I talked to a buddy of mine who runs a major staffing company. They have work they just can't get people to come out and the system for reporting them isn't functioning.
My cousin is in college an working part time in retail. She ended up already making her annual revenue for not working.
I hate it for some but the longer it draws out the worst things will be. It can't become an extension of social welfare. We have already seen what that creates.
The big deal was the extension to contractors versus employees and the volume of people impacted that don't directly pay into unemployment.
Walking in Walmart the day after the Trump stipends started to hit and weeks after the unemployment kicked in and not seeing a tv on the shelf and people shopping like it was Christmas. It will be interesting to see 2nd quarter numbers for Walmart and Home Depot.
I talked to a buddy of mine who runs a major staffing company. They have work they just can't get people to come out and the system for reporting them isn't functioning.
My cousin is in college an working part time in retail. She ended up already making her annual revenue for not working.
Posted on 7/21/20 at 4:21 pm to RealDawg
quote:
They have no ability to truly control who needs it because their actual job is closed or who is sitting home drawing money and not willing to do some work.
quote:
I talked to a buddy of mine who runs a major staffing company. They have work they just can't get people to come out and the system for reporting them isn't functioning.
There's a really easy way to fix most of the true fraud cases.
Reinstate job search requirements. Require them posted weekly in order to receive benefits. No job search = no benefits. That'll fix a ton of fraud due to general laziness.
I have to imagine measures for that are going to be in any further relief package that comes out of this.
Posted on 7/21/20 at 4:25 pm to wadewilson
I agree with your post. If a/your job becomes back open and you say no then the benefits should go away.
Posted on 7/21/20 at 4:28 pm to wadewilson
The tone I got from the post was “why are these people being criticized, they saved out economy with their spending in order to help us all out.” I didn’t disagree with her overall post that it helped the economy, funny how you left that part out of the quote though.
Posted on 7/21/20 at 4:34 pm to dukke v
quote:
I agree with your post. If a/your job becomes back open and you say no then the benefits should go away.
They will. In Louisiana if someone refuses the offer to come back to work, the employer is supposed to report it. These lazy mofos are ruining a program that’s keeping my lights on and mortgage paid. At 58 years old, it’s not as easy to find a job after a lay-off. I’m applying for jobs way below my experience level at this point and still not getting a chance.
Posted on 7/21/20 at 4:38 pm to Cincinnati Bowtie
Sorry about that....
Posted on 7/21/20 at 4:39 pm to sabes que
Most will go back to work after milking the system, many will bitch it isn't fair
Posted on 7/21/20 at 5:05 pm to Cincinnati Bowtie
Hang in their man. I know I've said that twice now in this thread but something will come up. It's tough situation
Posted on 7/23/20 at 11:55 am to blades8088
quote:Legit question. If you don't want to send your kid to school and instead choose the at home virtual option because you (not the kid) have a weakened immune system and can't risk your kid bringing the virus home, meaning you can't work and have to stay home with said kid then what? Tough apples?
Good, the 600 lasted longer than needed. No more sitting home with a 100% pay raise
Posted on 7/23/20 at 12:36 pm to wadewilson
Some are definitely abusing it. Some really do need it. If a person has paid taxes for years, and they need help. Don’t see the issue with it. We have helped so many countries, and big corps. If our citizens need help, why not help..
Posted on 7/23/20 at 12:57 pm to Russ337
At the beginning of this they extended benefits to the self-employed. It seems like there is no mechanism short of random audits to stop a self-employed person from working AND drawing benefits. And minimum wage earners are balling out. Meanwhile others are getting absolutely crushed and will likely be set back years. It's madness.

Posted on 7/23/20 at 12:59 pm to Lsupimp
quote:That's a fact.
It's madness.
Popular
Back to top


0







