- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Dyson's $499 Camera Toothbrush - Which one of you OT ballers is buying?
Posted on 9/2/26 at 2:30 pm
Posted on 9/2/26 at 2:30 pm
quote:
Dyson’s new $499 CameraJet hides a 1mm camera under the brush head, reading 28 images a second, and within 100 milliseconds of spotting a gap between your teeth it fires a cone of mouthrinse straight into it. That single lens is why Dyson also had to formulate its own non-foaming toothpaste, because bubbles blind a camera. It is also why the 12.5ml tank runs a diaphragm pump and pressure chamber, so the jet still fires when you tilt the handle sideways to reach your back molars. One optical decision rewrote the rest of the product. Call it innovation, or call it vertical integration.
James Dyson unveiled it in Paris this morning, capping six years of work, 661 engineers and 38 patents. The vision system is called Gap Optical Targeting, trained on 470,000 dental images and running 16 million lines of code, all so a toothbrush can find the spaces nine in ten of us never floss. It ships today at $499, or £419.99 in the UK, in Ceramic Ultra Blue and Ceramic Pink. You also get a dock that refills the tank in three seconds and RFID brush heads that count their own cleans. Every one of those parts exists because somebody decided a toothbrush needs eyesight.
https://www.yankodesign.com/2026/09/01/dysons-499-camera-toothbrush-is-so-advanced-they-had-to-redesign-the-toothpaste-for-it/
quote:
The jet took years of refinement on its own, because the shape of the water is about as important as the camera aiming it. Traditional water flossers use what Dyson calls a needle jet, a narrow, piercing stream that punches through a plaque deposit without actually lifting it away. Dyson’s engineers went hunting for a shape that would sweep plaque off the tooth instead of tunneling through it, and landed on a broad conical spray fired at lower pressure. To test that idea without running a clinical trial every time they tweaked the nozzle, Dyson spent five years building its own synthetic plaque with the National University of Singapore’s Faculty of Dentistry.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 2:38 pm to Shexter
My dentist has some shite where she can show me on a screen when she's in my mouth. Pause
That shite is gross bro
That shite is gross bro
Posted on 9/2/26 at 2:42 pm to Shexter
Bronners makes a good non-foaming, fluoride-free toothpaste...also regarding flossing...only floss the teeth you want to keep.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 2:56 pm to Shexter
For real though, we're bitching about the exorbidant pricing of fast food currently. Nobody got time for $500 toothbrushes. 
Posted on 9/2/26 at 2:57 pm to Shexter
So a British Company made a high tech AI toothbrush?

Posted on 9/2/26 at 3:02 pm to Shexter
I can't quite place it, but it seems like if you remove the toothbrush attachment it kind of looks like something else...


Posted on 9/2/26 at 3:44 pm to Shexter
No lie after watching the video I want to try this and would blow $500 to give it a shot.
Hell I’ve spent $500 on worse.
Hell I’ve spent $500 on worse.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 4:37 pm to HuskyPanda
quote:
No lie after watching the video I want to try this and would blow $500 to give it a shot.
Make sure you post a review. Start a new thread please.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 6:33 pm to Shexter
As a dentist, I feel safe in saying that the trashy people who need this the most can not afford it. A simple toothbrush and floss do the job as long as you use them.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:50 pm to TigrrrDad
They made what looks to be a really good product. Wasn’t cheap to engineer and make.
I’m all about company’s making superior products seems like we have the cheap stuff more than covered.
But I’m out
I’m all about company’s making superior products seems like we have the cheap stuff more than covered.
But I’m out
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:53 pm to Shexter
But how is it on carpets and hard floors?
Posted on 9/2/26 at 9:53 pm to theone
quote:
They made what looks to be a really good product. Wasn’t cheap to engineer and make. I’m all about company’s making superior products seems like we have the cheap stuff more than covered
They did - but at 100x the cost of what already does the job if used regularly. I’ve found that dental hygiene, generally speaking, tends to mirror socioeconomic status. The people with rotten teeth generally can’t afford a $500 toothbrush.
This post was edited on 9/2/26 at 9:54 pm
Popular
Back to top
10












