- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 8/12/19 at 11:25 am to MarineVet
quote:
sarcasm because I know all of you are slow
Dude, that's not the accepted nomenclature. We prefer "limited speed".
Posted on 8/12/19 at 11:26 am to magildachunks
quote:
Dude, that's not the accepted nomenclature. We prefer "limited speed
It's fricking pathetic that it's nearly the year 2020 and we still have to tell people this smh
Posted on 8/12/19 at 11:26 am to magildachunks
My bad, I am still new here and trying to figure things out. 
Posted on 8/12/19 at 11:30 am to MarineVet
quote:
You just seem a little bothered by my posts
How?
Posted on 8/12/19 at 11:31 am to TH03
quote:
How
You disagree with him
Posted on 8/12/19 at 12:24 pm to VanRIch
quote:
That's not what you said, you said "any murders" not "all murders"
I know, my bad.
Posted on 8/12/19 at 12:27 pm to LSUTigerFan247
quote:quote:
Good point, why have any rules or laws at all?
No one is saying that, but whats the point of a gun free zone?
I suspect that the point is the owner of the establishment prefers it that way and we believe in private property rights in the USA. Just a guess on my part.
Does the gun free zone make the place any safer, doubtful (with the possible exception of the guy who legally carries who lose his mind for some reason or the gun that falls out of the holster and accidentally goes off and injures someone). But it may help certain customers to feel more comfortable.
I really don't care.
Posted on 8/12/19 at 12:40 pm to LSUTigerFan247
Great idea, the government should do a mandatory buy-back gun program for all gang members, criminals, and other radical hate groups!
Posted on 8/12/19 at 1:03 pm to Proximo
quote:
That’s not true at all.
They deter honest people from committing crimes. They do not prevent determined criminals... They punish them.
I said pretty much the exact same thing you did.
Posted on 8/12/19 at 1:23 pm to mdomingue
I think it was Tennessee that recently instituted a law that said any business that declared itself as a gun-free zone would be liable for any deaths/injuries that occurred on their property if you were to get shot. If you take away people’s ability to defend themselves then it’s up to the business to provide that security and I’m perfectly fine with that.
Posted on 8/12/19 at 1:26 pm to FredsGotSlacks
quote:
I think it was Tennessee that recently instituted a law that said any business that declared itself as a gun-free zone would be liable for any deaths/injuries that occurred on their property if you were to get shot. If you take away people’s ability to defend themselves then it’s up to the business to provide that security and I’m perfectly fine with that.
Very interesting if true. One could also argue that you weren't forced to shop there and that that was the risk you took coming in.
Posted on 8/12/19 at 2:45 pm to FredsGotSlacks
quote:
I think it was Tennessee that recently instituted a law that said any business that declared itself as a gun-free zone would be liable for any deaths/injuries that occurred on their property if you were to get shot. If you take away people’s ability to defend themselves then it’s up to the business to provide that security and I’m perfectly fine with that.
Well, I guess that's good if you like government overreach and blaming people other than the criminal that does the shooting. Should we hold the owner of an establishment liable if he allows concealed or open carry and someone with a legal carry right inadvertently or intentionally shoots someone? Or do we hold those CC licensed folks liable for not providing protection to others there?
I'm all for the second amendment and don't want Uncle Sam doing anything to abridge that right but I also believe private property rights supercede your right to do anything, legal or illegal, on my property.
Posted on 8/12/19 at 2:48 pm to CarRamrod
What if I started a church where we worshipped guns? Could I bring a gun in there?
Posted on 8/12/19 at 4:32 pm to OweO
quote:
What if I started a church where we worshipped guns? Could I bring a gun in there?
If it was your church you'd make the rules baw
Posted on 8/13/19 at 6:28 am to Salmon
quote:
because the chances of a mass shooting are still astronomically slim?
And yet they happen.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 6:32 am to LSUTigerFan247
quote:
Because I would rather not get arrested and risk losing my job, like most law abiding gun owners don't want to risk.
You won't get arrested for carrying concealed into a place that just posts a no guns sign. They can ask you to leave, which you must do but it's not against any Louisiana law unless it's a place the the law says you can not carry.
Regardless, if I'm carrying concealed how are they going to know? Search every customer?
Posted on 8/13/19 at 6:37 am to Ed Osteen
quote:I consider all the possibilities. 9 times out of 10 if a place posts no guns I go else where for a variety of reasons. But yes I do worry about people who are gullible enough to believe that posting a no guns sign actually make them safer.
Is this something you regularly consider?
Posted on 8/13/19 at 6:59 am to Snipe
quote:
You won't get arrested for carrying concealed into a place that just posts a no guns sign. They can ask you to leave, which you must do but it's not against any Louisiana law unless it's a place the the law says you can not carry.
It's trespassing, but you're right, they wouldn't likely know.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 7:41 am to FredsGotSlacks
quote:
I think it was Tennessee that recently instituted a law that said any business that declared itself as a gun-free zone would be liable for any deaths/injuries that occurred on their property if you were to get shot.
Not sure if this actually became a law, but according to an article about the proposed legislation, it would give a concealed carry permit holder the right to sue.
From an article about the proposed legislation;
"The legislation places responsibility on the business or property owner of the gun-free area to protect the gun owner from any incidents that occur with any “invitees,” trespassers and employees found on the property, as well as vicious and wild animals and “defensible man-made and natural hazards.”
The bill does not define defensible man-made and natural hazards.
A handgun carry permit holder who is injured by any of the aforementioned would be able to file a lawsuit within two years of when the event occurred, provided they meet the following requirements... According to the language of the bill, the right to sue the property owner does not extend to individuals without gun permits."
This post was edited on 8/13/19 at 7:45 am
Page 8 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News