- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do people realize the fuel for EVs is Petroleum?
Posted on 9/2/24 at 8:15 am to MintBerry Crunch
Posted on 9/2/24 at 8:15 am to MintBerry Crunch
quote:
Electric vehicle (EV) batteries typically last 10 to 20 years, and are not typically replaced every five years”
$25k every 10 years is a lot.
Posted on 9/2/24 at 8:18 am to Azkiger
I can't speak about 2004, but good data shows that an eight year (effective) lifespan can be expected under normal, consumer usage.
It is interesting that despite this positive, EV resale is terrible and EV adoption has essentially flatlined.
Until infrastructure and battery tech improves that's where we are.
It is interesting that despite this positive, EV resale is terrible and EV adoption has essentially flatlined.
Until infrastructure and battery tech improves that's where we are.
Posted on 9/2/24 at 8:34 am to Saunson69
Maybe you should take at look at vehicles powered by CNG.
Posted on 9/2/24 at 8:37 am to MintBerry Crunch
quote:Do have to account for the 5% line loss (getting power from plant to charging station), 7% loss at the charging station and a possible loss of 8-32% at the battery (unlikely- only happens if sits unused).
Efficiency is better with EVs.
Power plants are better at turning gas into energy than cars are. Same amount of fuel at the power plant powers more EVs than the same amount in a gas engine.
Posted on 9/2/24 at 8:45 am to Saunson69
The vast majority of people don’t buy EVs to be environmentally conscience. It’s way more tech early adopters. Most of the marketing data I’ve seen was less than 20% tree huggers.
Posted on 9/2/24 at 8:54 am to kywildcatfanone
quote:
$25k every 10 years is a lot.
That’s assuming a salvage value of zero, which isn’t realistic.
Posted on 9/2/24 at 9:05 am to Saunson69
Doggie, some people like battery powered drills and some prefer plug-in.
If your EV has ever (almost) died in the wrong part of town at a bad hour, your preference may change.
All that said, I had a Hybrid for over 10 years (with no battery issues) and loved it.
If your EV has ever (almost) died in the wrong part of town at a bad hour, your preference may change.
All that said, I had a Hybrid for over 10 years (with no battery issues) and loved it.
Posted on 9/2/24 at 9:11 am to billjamin
And the aftermarket will take this price down further...
Posted on 9/2/24 at 9:13 am to Saunson69
quote:
Some of the electricity may be from wind, solar, nuclear, hydro, but it is likely coming from natural gas.
No shite
Posted on 9/2/24 at 9:14 am to I20goon
quote:
Do have to account for the 5% line loss (getting power from plant to charging station), 7% loss at the charging station and a possible loss of 8-32% at the battery (unlikely- only happens if sits unused).
And yet it’s still more efficient
Posted on 9/2/24 at 9:16 am to Saunson69
C'mon man, we all know that 'lectricity comes from the power outlet on the wall, the 3rd rate bartender from NY, aka Sandy aoc, told us so.
EVs are just little play-pretty's for the well off and the Karens & their cuck husbands.
Think about this: It takes a half a million pounds, 500,000 lbs. of raw earf materials just to make ONE, thats UNO, UN, EINS, EEN...EV battery so Karen and her cuck hubby can drive around and pat themselves on their blessed little backs for saving the environment.
Consider:
You see those yuge gigantic Earf moving trucks and other machinery being towed down the Interstate Highways. You see the 18 wheelers hauling those gigantic tires that are 8-10 tall.
Which leads to another point: Lithium mining. Huge pits have to be cut deep down into the Earth which goes down hundreds of feet and hundreds of miles wide. The environmental damage is immense.
EVs are inferior to ICE vehicles in just about EVERY category.
They are heavier and require lots more energy to power one.
EVs do have a lot more torque and there are some useful applications for them.
Warehouse forklifts, golf carts...even then, they require charging stations and the battery packs are nasty and in constant need of maintenance.
I know of a few instances where school districts right here in Louisiana have purchased EV school buses and they are now parked in the back yard because they don't run and the mechanics don't know how to repair them and the waiting list for repairs by qualified techs has NO ETA.
There went a cool $250,000 per bus that is basically a useless hunk of junk sitting in the back lot doing nothing but taking up space.
They could have taken that money and purchase 3-4 ICE buses that would last 20-25 years with basic maintenance costs involved.
I keep hearing of all these new 'breakthroughs' on battery technology. Well as someone said, 'Show me the money'. We have been reading about these breakthroughs for the last 30 years.
The only real advance we have had in batteries is the lithium battery technology. And that has peaked, there is going to be a few tweaks here and there.
Until there is a quantum leap in battery technology, we will still need ICE vehicles for a long long time.
EVs are just little play-pretty's for the well off and the Karens & their cuck husbands.
Think about this: It takes a half a million pounds, 500,000 lbs. of raw earf materials just to make ONE, thats UNO, UN, EINS, EEN...EV battery so Karen and her cuck hubby can drive around and pat themselves on their blessed little backs for saving the environment.
Consider:
quote:
Today, a typical EV battery weighs one thousand pounds. It contains twenty-five pounds of lithium, sixty pounds of nickel, 44 pounds of manganese, 30 pounds cobalt,
200 pounds of copper, and 400 pounds of aluminum,
steel, and plastic. Inside are over 6,000 individual lithium-ion cells.
It should concern you that all those toxic components come from mining. For instance, to manufacture each EV auto battery, you must process 25,000 pounds of brine for the lithium, 30,000 pounds of ore for the cobalt,
5,000 pounds of ore for the nickel, and 25,000 pounds of ore for copper.
All told, you dig up 500,000 pounds of the earth’s crust for just one battery.
You see those yuge gigantic Earf moving trucks and other machinery being towed down the Interstate Highways. You see the 18 wheelers hauling those gigantic tires that are 8-10 tall.
quote:
Each mine usually consists of thirty-five to forty humongous 797 Caterpillar haul trucks along
with hundreds of other large equipment.
Each 797 uses around half a million gallons of diesel a year. So, with an inventory of just thirty-five the haul trucks alone are using 17.5 million gallons of fuel a year for just
one lithium site.
Which leads to another point: Lithium mining. Huge pits have to be cut deep down into the Earth which goes down hundreds of feet and hundreds of miles wide. The environmental damage is immense.
EVs are inferior to ICE vehicles in just about EVERY category.
They are heavier and require lots more energy to power one.
EVs do have a lot more torque and there are some useful applications for them.
Warehouse forklifts, golf carts...even then, they require charging stations and the battery packs are nasty and in constant need of maintenance.
I know of a few instances where school districts right here in Louisiana have purchased EV school buses and they are now parked in the back yard because they don't run and the mechanics don't know how to repair them and the waiting list for repairs by qualified techs has NO ETA.
There went a cool $250,000 per bus that is basically a useless hunk of junk sitting in the back lot doing nothing but taking up space.
They could have taken that money and purchase 3-4 ICE buses that would last 20-25 years with basic maintenance costs involved.
I keep hearing of all these new 'breakthroughs' on battery technology. Well as someone said, 'Show me the money'. We have been reading about these breakthroughs for the last 30 years.
The only real advance we have had in batteries is the lithium battery technology. And that has peaked, there is going to be a few tweaks here and there.
Until there is a quantum leap in battery technology, we will still need ICE vehicles for a long long time.
Posted on 9/2/24 at 9:16 am to N2cars
quote:
Until infrastructure and battery tech improves that's where we are.
Yeah
More public level 3 and 4 chargers are needed for the range anxiety crowd to even think about getting an EV. I'm not going to be in the market for another car for at least 5 years but I still don't see the infrastructure being there for it to suit my needs.
Posted on 9/2/24 at 9:30 am to Saunson69
But Bootyjuice told me they are efficient.
Posted on 9/2/24 at 9:40 am to Saunson69
Have you ever considered that some people buy EVs because they can be a lot of fun to drive and it’s nice to charge at home and not have to stop for gas or oil changes? I’m not trying to save the world, I just really really like my Tesla.
Posted on 9/2/24 at 9:43 am to Saunson69
quote:
Gasoline in your car is sourced from a refinery which releases a lot of CO2
So?
Posted on 9/2/24 at 9:46 am to Saunson69
Liberals and Climate Change psychos..
This post was edited on 9/2/24 at 9:47 am
Posted on 9/2/24 at 9:47 am to Reubaltaich
There’s a lifecycle break even point for every manufacturer. Tesla commissioned an independent engineers report on it a few years ago when I did my second lease portfolio deal with them because the primary investor had an ESG team that was pitching a fit. I seem to remember it being around the 5 year or 50k miles range. I could check later when I get home. I still have the report. That will deviate heavily between manufacturers because of supply chain differences.
Posted on 9/2/24 at 9:50 am to Rust Cohle
quote:
Samsung will start producing a solid-state battery in 27 with a range of 600 miles and a charge time of nine minutes
Posted on 9/2/24 at 10:16 am to Azkiger
quote:
Ford, for example, only backs their batteries for 100k miles.
15k miles a year (average mileage for Americans) = 6.6 years.
Ford's not confident past that point for a rreason.
By that argument, all cars fail about the same rate because 100k miles is a common warranty threshold.
Popular
Back to top



1






