- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Did we shut down too early?
Posted on 6/25/20 at 1:28 pm
Posted on 6/25/20 at 1:28 pm
Not asking if we should have or not but did we just do it to early? Here in Houston we are seeing a significant increase in cases and our numbers were originally not bad for the size of the city. Should cities have been shut down based off of cases per capita instead of just shutting down nationwide? I wondered if they every considered letting it spread in cities till it hit the a per capita number to help build up some heard immunity when re opening. This way when you reopen it spreads slower and a sustainable rate.
ETA: This argument is assuming you had to shutdown. Not shutting down is not an option.
ETA: This argument is assuming you had to shutdown. Not shutting down is not an option.
This post was edited on 6/25/20 at 2:15 pm
Posted on 6/25/20 at 1:28 pm to thadcastle
How is the death rate looking though?
Posted on 6/25/20 at 1:28 pm to thadcastle
Well, we shut down... so yeah.
Posted on 6/25/20 at 1:29 pm to thadcastle
You’re asking if people should have taken a more customized approach across a country if 350,000,000 as opposed to just do what New York is doing?
Posted on 6/25/20 at 1:29 pm to thadcastle
Had we not seen the huge spike in deaths we likely wouldn't have shutdown like we did.
The age group being infected now aren't the same as the initial group that resulted in lots of deaths. You would assume the death tolls won't increase like before
The age group being infected now aren't the same as the initial group that resulted in lots of deaths. You would assume the death tolls won't increase like before
Posted on 6/25/20 at 1:29 pm to thadcastle
Yes
Texas and Florida shut down for nothing. They never had a first wave
Texas and Florida shut down for nothing. They never had a first wave
Posted on 6/25/20 at 1:30 pm to thadcastle
Most people will have to eventually deal with this virus. Shutting down does nothing but prolong the inevitable.
Posted on 6/25/20 at 1:31 pm to thadcastle
The shutdown in general was dumb....but let's just ignore that for posterity and say yes shutdown was necessary.
It was absolutely stupid to take a 1 size fits all approach to it. There was no reason for Texas, Arkansas, Florida, etc to be shut down back when NY, Louisiana, and Washington needed it. Likewise....it would be dumb for NY or Louisiana to shutdown now when it might need to happen in FL or TX.
Now back to reality....shutdowns were never necessary for anybody.
It was absolutely stupid to take a 1 size fits all approach to it. There was no reason for Texas, Arkansas, Florida, etc to be shut down back when NY, Louisiana, and Washington needed it. Likewise....it would be dumb for NY or Louisiana to shutdown now when it might need to happen in FL or TX.
Now back to reality....shutdowns were never necessary for anybody.
Posted on 6/25/20 at 1:32 pm to LSU316
quote:
it would be dumb for NY or Louisiana to shutdown now when it might need to happen in FL or TX.
Don’t tell that to JBE
Posted on 6/25/20 at 1:32 pm to thadcastle
Shouldn't have shut down at all. Isn't it now obvious to everyone that there is no getting past this without getting a bunch of people infected and getting some degree of immunity? Look at NY, Sweden, Italy, etc. They are clearly on the back end of this and deaths have fallen off a cliff. Was it painful to get there? Yes, but it is the only way.
Posted on 6/25/20 at 1:32 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
as opposed to just do what New York is doing?
Man, the media's love affair with New York and Cuomo is disgusting.
Never got grilled for the shitty decisions made at the beginning (sending infected nursing home patients back to the homes from the hospital to save capacity) and likely releasing phony LTC facility death numbers because off how they count, but they are now praising him/them because they are bouncing back.
No shite! They had the scary (aka "bad") epidemic curve we were all told to avoid. No wonder they're numbers have improved so much.
Now other states on their "scary spike" (Texas, Florida, etc.) are getting shite on because they actually flattened their curves at the beginning.
This post was edited on 6/25/20 at 1:34 pm
Posted on 6/25/20 at 1:41 pm to thadcastle
Should have never shut down
Posted on 6/25/20 at 1:48 pm to thadcastle
My fiancé’s Aunt tested positive twice here in Houston. First test was in mid May along with the entire nursing home but didn’t get results back until 3-4 weeks later. During that time, she developed pneumonia and was tested again individually a day before she passed. Both were positive.
Does that count as two positive tests here in Houston? I’m sure they counted both when they pulled daily numbers. But it only counts as one death? Is that 50% mortality rate for her or 100%?
Point is, there are issues with testing and what positive tests actually mean for this virus.
Does that count as two positive tests here in Houston? I’m sure they counted both when they pulled daily numbers. But it only counts as one death? Is that 50% mortality rate for her or 100%?
Point is, there are issues with testing and what positive tests actually mean for this virus.
Posted on 6/25/20 at 1:50 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Had we not seen the huge spike in deaths we likely wouldn't have shutdown like we did.
Probably not. The images from Italy and the news coming out of NY freaked everyone out. Without that and the death toll (which is about 45% of U.S. total) early on, this would have damn near been a nothing burger.
Posted on 6/25/20 at 1:51 pm to thadcastle
No. We just opened up too soon.
Posted on 6/25/20 at 1:51 pm to Slingin Pickle
Posted on 6/25/20 at 1:57 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
No. We just opened up too soon.
Posted on 6/25/20 at 2:11 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
No. We just opened up too soon.
If this is true wouldn't we have to shut down the entire world until every last person is tested and it comes back negative? Meaning no human left on earth has the virus.
Posted on 6/25/20 at 2:15 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
No. We just opened up too soon.
Don't be dumb.
Posted on 6/25/20 at 2:16 pm to thadcastle
quote:
Did we shut down too early?
We took a half measure between two solutions:
Viral elimination
Herd immunity
If we were going to shut down, it should’ve been hard and fast, but we half-assed it. Now, we have people still afraid of something that will propagate regardless of what we do besides becoming eternal hermits.
Popular
Back to top


19












