- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Derek Chauvin trial - GUILTY ON ALL CHARGES. Update: His sentencing is today
Posted on 3/31/21 at 12:09 pm to IT_Dawg
Posted on 3/31/21 at 12:09 pm to IT_Dawg
quote:
There’s no murder charge he faces that could give him life
you're missing my point....."they" want him to do life and die in prison.....they dont care about anything else
the ignorant people that protest and march arent smart enough to realize what you and I understand
0
Posted on 3/31/21 at 12:09 pm to Abraham H Parnassis
These Court TV commentators are going to get Cup Foods burned to the ground for calling the cops.
Possibly get some of the staff murdered as well.
Possibly get some of the staff murdered as well.
Posted on 3/31/21 at 12:10 pm to Abraham H Parnassis
Revered??????? Post a link where I said this......
Posted on 3/31/21 at 12:10 pm to jbgleason
quote:
Possibly get some of the staff murdered as well.
I'm sure thats why that kid quit working there. Shame...
Posted on 3/31/21 at 12:13 pm to JDPndahizzy
Watching Court TV who cares what the feelings of the bystanders are. Chauvin either broke the law in what he did or he didn't. The feelings of people who saw it means nothing when it comes to the application of the law.
Posted on 3/31/21 at 12:15 pm to MFn GIMP
Because all the other side has is emotion, and they are hoping emotion will win over facts.
Posted on 3/31/21 at 12:16 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:
who cares what the feelings of the bystanders are.
Agreed. I am used to Federal Court but it is very restrictive. If it doesn't deal EXACTLY with the charges then it isn't admitted. If an attorney or witness starts to drift, the Judge jumps on them with both feet.
This testimony is all over the place compared to what I am used to seeing.
Posted on 3/31/21 at 12:17 pm to JDPndahizzy
quote:
I'm sure thats why that kid quit working there. Shame...
Sounds like he and his mom lived above the store too. Did he say if they've moved? Isn't that area currently occupied by people and there's essentially anarchy?
Posted on 3/31/21 at 12:18 pm to dukke v
quote:Not gonna search through your whole, sad post history. You know it and I know it. At least one other poster made mention of it in the last 15 minutes or so.
Revered??????? Post a link where I said this......
You hopped on to the anti-Chauvin. What's making you change your mind? The facts of the case?
Posted on 3/31/21 at 12:20 pm to GEAUXmedic
quote:
Because all the other side has is emotion, and they are hoping emotion will win over facts.
Yep, just like in the OJ case where they were hoping race would play over fact.
I recall that Shapiro when asked if they would play the race card before the trial said absolutely not.
After the trial when he was asked if they did he said “they dealt it from the bottom of the deck”. And that’s why OJ walked.
Posted on 3/31/21 at 12:23 pm to Abraham H Parnassis
I wish you and Dukkee V would bury the hatchet for the health of the thread.
Posted on 3/31/21 at 12:27 pm to Abraham H Parnassis
quote:
Abraham H Parnassis
quote:
dukke v
You guys should just frick already
Posted on 3/31/21 at 12:27 pm to jbgleason
All of this over a counterfeit 20$ bill. What was GF employment history? Will that be brought up? We all know he was a felon.
Posted on 3/31/21 at 12:29 pm to Indiangensing
quote:
We all know he was a felon.
Is the judge going to allow this?
Posted on 3/31/21 at 12:30 pm to Indiangensing
quote:
What was GF employment history?
That's immaterial to what happened during the arrest, right? Not sure what the point of bringing up his employment history would be.
Posted on 3/31/21 at 12:34 pm to TDTOM
quote:
We all know he was a felon.
Is the judge going to allow this?
Probably immaterial to the case. Unless the defense wants to mount a jury nullification argument.
Posted on 3/31/21 at 12:36 pm to TDTOM
quote:
We all know he was a felon.
Is the judge going to allow this?
Is anyone going to highlight the fact that he was resisting from the very second the officers approached him while he was in his vehicle? Even after he was cuffed and sitting on the ground..when they got him back on his feet he was still resisting.
Posted on 3/31/21 at 12:37 pm to MFn GIMP
Is it though? None of this would have happened had George Floyd been able to pay legal currency for his vices.
Posted on 3/31/21 at 12:43 pm to tgrbaitn08
quote:
s anyone going to highlight the fact that he was resisting from the very second the officers approached him while he was in his vehicle? Even after he was cuffed and sitting on the ground..when they got him back on his feet he was still resisting.
I believe Minneapolis police follow a “proportionality” doctrine when using restraints. Prosecution is trying to prove that at some point prior to Floyd losing consciousness, he was neutralized as a threat. (While laying on the ground in the prone position with hands in cuffs.) prosecution is trying to prove that at some point the officers should have begun acting in their secondary capacity as first responders and addressed Floyd’s breathing difficulties.
The prosecution isn’t denying the initial need to apply proportional force to restrain Floyd. But they are arguing that Chauvin exceeded what was necessary and exacerbated Floyd’s condition.
Page 91 of 524
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News