- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Derek Chauvin trial - GUILTY ON ALL CHARGES. Update: His sentencing is today
Posted on 4/15/21 at 9:56 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 4/15/21 at 9:56 am to SlowFlowPro
Prosecution has been a clown show so no surprise they're pulling this
1
Posted on 4/15/21 at 9:57 am to The Boat
This team of prosecutors have been completely outclassed by Nelson, put on a horrific case that leaves enormous doubt, and now tries to side door some BS evidence on late notice. What a disgrace
Posted on 4/15/21 at 9:58 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:It's a chief ingredient in the synthesis of fentanyl.
they're going to likely present testimony that the carbon monoxide levels was due to environmental factors
Posted on 4/15/21 at 9:59 am to Abraham H Parnassis
I'm not well versed on criminal trials but to me this ruling seems absolutely ridiculous.
This post was edited on 4/15/21 at 10:00 am
Posted on 4/15/21 at 9:59 am to SlowFlowPro
Ellison has screwed this thing up from the beginning. I always have contended this is a dog and pony show. If he was serious they would have let the Feds handle this as a Civil Rights case.
Maybe I am wrong. But we all knew Chauvin was going to walk once the facts came out.
Maybe I am wrong. But we all knew Chauvin was going to walk once the facts came out.
Posted on 4/15/21 at 9:59 am to Abraham H Parnassis
This is setup for a mistrial
Board up the shops
Board up the shops
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:00 am to Abraham H Parnassis
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/2/25 at 7:09 am
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:00 am to Tigers0891
I think with this prosecution lawyer asking the questions, there is now a 50/50 shot at a mistrial.
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:01 am to sms151t
i'm curious what happens if this prosecutor completely fricks up and the doctor does testify to stuff that creates a mistrial. it will be borderline intentional at that point.
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:02 am to September 1948
quote:
They rested their case already. Is there precedence for reopening? If there isn't , tough shite for them.
Its allowed, BUT ONLY as to rebut evidence presented by Defense. NOT allowed to advance new theories.
State back on at 1015..... and that prosecutor should be absolutely be walking on eggshells at the podium as judge made it clear that State is flirting with a mistrial .
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:02 am to SlowFlowPro
What happens if the defense attorney tricks Tobin into saying something about test results?
I’d imagine held in contempt, but mistrial also?
I’d imagine held in contempt, but mistrial also?
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:02 am to wileyjones
quote:
This is setup for a mistrial
Board up the shops
Prosecution is doing this on purpose for a do over since they know they got worked?
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:03 am to SlowFlowPro
If the prosecution deliberately causes a mistrial isn't that somewhat circumventing double jeopardy?
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:03 am to LRTiger
Not sure why he is asking questions at all. It is ridiculous to me that Chauvin can get possibly two or three not guilty from the jurors and its a hung jury and they can retry him. With chances to fix their own frick ups.
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:04 am to Lsut81
quote:
What happens if the defense attorney tricks Tobin into saying something about test results?
I’d imagine held in contempt, but mistrial also?
I believe that is what is called "opening the door" and then at that point all bets are off. The State could then ask them.
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:05 am to bikerack
This is a clown show. I'm confused why they are allowed to call this witness again? Admittedly, I don't know enough about the legal process but can the defense just call another witness to rebut the prosecutions testimony?
HLN Misty Marris expert: "Defense rest, Nelson decides to stop the bleeding"
HLN Misty Marris expert: "Defense rest, Nelson decides to stop the bleeding"
This post was edited on 4/15/21 at 10:09 am
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:08 am to Sherman Klump
Court TV host just said Chauvin looks like Hannibal Lector
Unreal
Unreal
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:10 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Defense brought up carbo monoxide level tests
Prosecution's witness, on his own, got rebuttal evidence via new tests (i think)
State wanted to call him as a rebuttal witness to discuss these new results
judge said state had notice of issue and could have presented these issues previously and rebuttal evidence about new tests would cause a mistrial
So thats a good thing for the defense right?
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:11 am to tgrbaitn08
Yes but bad news that they get to call their best witness again.
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:12 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
i'm curious what happens if this prosecutor completely fricks up and the doctor does testify to stuff that creates a mistrial. it will be borderline intentional at that point.
cities will burn
Page 390 of 524
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News