- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Derek Chauvin trial - GUILTY ON ALL CHARGES. Update: His sentencing is today
Posted on 4/10/21 at 3:37 pm to LightMerchant
Posted on 4/10/21 at 3:37 pm to LightMerchant
We can't speculate. We do know that technique is taught at the police academy. I don't know what the policy says of when you release (is it an officers judgment?). Personally, I put more blame on the initial officer who escalated the situation by dropping F-bombs. I would be livid if a cop told me to "fricking comply." Very irresponsible under the circumstances.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 3:38 pm to Gamera
quote:
I have been out of pocket for the last couple of days - but isn’t this game, set, match? How could anyone looking at GF know he had a heart condition? The corollary is without those heart conditions the subdual and restraint doesn’t result in death.
For 3rd degree murder the act must be “eminently dangerous to others.” How could an act that wouldn’t normally result in death be considered eminently dangerous?
Similarly, for manslaughter the defendant must commit “culpable negligence whereby the person creates an unreasonable risk, and consciously takes chances of causing death or great bodily harm to another.” If he survives but for his unknown cardiac issues - how does one conclude the act created an unreasonable risk? Further, how can it be said one is consciously taking chances of causing death?
There is a lot of emotion involved and unbelievable pressure on the jury, so who knows. But this certainly raises substantial, much less reasonable doubt of guilt.
Great explanation. Makes perfect sense.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 3:41 pm to theenemy
Yeah I think when you look at who is at fault you say George Floyd was the reason the cops came. Then Floyd was the reason he got take out of the car, and Floyd was the reason he ultimately got put on his stomach and handcuffed. Throw in the drugs and his behavior and the crowd around and you can’t fault the cops.
This post was edited on 4/10/21 at 3:43 pm
Posted on 4/10/21 at 3:42 pm to LightMerchant
quote:
I speculated passive-aggression. ( not well-received here ). A possibility is that he was “teaching Floyd a lesson”. Maybe it pissed him off royally that Floyd resisted as he did and made what could have been rather easy into something difficult.
What evidence supports that speculation?
I think it is more likely that the officers were caught in a weird situation and made a bad choice of holding and waiting for EMS.
There is nothing that suggests he was intentionally trying to do harm due anger.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 3:54 pm to supadave3
quote:
I don’t envy anyone involved, not the cops involved, not the jury, and certainly not George Floyd. This is going to end very messy for everyone.
I agree with this.
Even if he is found NG, his life is ruined. He will forever be known as the guy that took a rest on a dying junkie. He will also be approached, and attacked, every time he leaves the house.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 3:54 pm to diat150
quote:
Yeah I think when you look at who is at fault you say George Floyd was the reason the cops came. Then Floyd was the reason he got take out of the car, and Floyd was the reason he ultimately got out in his stomach and handcuffed. Throw in the drugs and his behavior and the crowd around and you can’t fault the cops.
All relevant to a certain degree, but all the above also becomes red herring at a certain point as well. Ultimately the questions become this:
Whether DC knew or should have known of GF's swiftly deteriorating medical condition, and then whether DC was possessed of any reasonably available options to mitigate GF's medical condition. And to a more speculative degree, what DC's mindset was if it's determined that he did have options reasonably available to mitigate, yet consciously chose not to exercise said option(s).
Posted on 4/10/21 at 4:04 pm to davyjones
Should've laid off the meth and fentanyl I guess. Then he'd still be around to shove guns into pregnant women's stomachs and get murals painted of himself for doing it.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 4:06 pm to davyjones
I haven’t watched this since day 1 of it. Is there a feeling either way of how this could go?
Posted on 4/10/21 at 4:08 pm to DaleGribblesMower
quote:
Should've laid off the meth and fentanyl I guess.
He sure should have, and that's completely on him. But as a matter of the legal parameters of this trial, it's not necessarily a factor, besides the hairy issue of cause of death, of course. But yes, I agree with that sentiment.
This post was edited on 4/10/21 at 4:10 pm
Posted on 4/10/21 at 4:11 pm to AUCE05
quote:
We can't speculate. We do know that technique is taught at the police academy. I don't know what the policy says of when you release (is it an officers judgment?). Personally, I put more blame on the initial officer who escalated the situation by dropping F-bombs. I would be livid if a cop told me to "fricking comply." Very irresponsible under the circumstances.
Cops, as a general rule, are fairly low-IQ individuals. The standards to be a police officer are extremely low and you guys are expecting these shitheels to be critical thinkers under stress.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 4:13 pm to DaleGribblesMower
quote:well if you’re going to paint a broad brush why don’t you break it down by race?
Cops, as a general rule, are fairly low-IQ individuals
Posted on 4/10/21 at 4:21 pm to theenemy
quote:
What evidence supports that speculation?
Well, given it is only speculation it doesn’t require any supporting evidence.
I base it on several things. Reports of Chauvin being aggro in the past, the anger I would feel in that situation, the anger it caused in myself when watching the video of Floyd carrying on and being a little B and not simply doing as instructed, the fact that Chauvin worked a high crime area no doubt regularly encountering ignorant people, drug addicts, hostility towards police, name calling of police, and ridiculous, unnecessary resisting of arrest.
How could anyone NOT become fed up with people in an area like that and not have some anger towards the community?
Add in that a police officer was shot in the back of the head as he was eating pizza in a pizza joint only a few blocks from where Chauvin had the encounter with Floyd. Shot by a black gang-member. Something every cop in that city knows about. “this is the community that kills cops” may well have been the mindset.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 4:24 pm to DaleGribblesMower
quote:
Cops, as a general rule, are fairly low-IQ individuals.
This has proven to be false over and over but keep being a dumb arse that spreads misinformation. Do you work in media?
Posted on 4/10/21 at 4:25 pm to Hogwall Jackson
quote:
I haven’t watched this since day 1 of it. Is there a feeling either way of how this could go?
JMO, I suspect either conviction of a lesser offense, or alternatively a hung jury/mistrial. I believe the jury will be less affected by the sense of fear and concern about blowback from the public regarding their final decision as many people think is the case, and they'll appropriately duke it out behind closed doors once deliberations begin. They'll come to a fully considered decision for a lesser and included offense, or they'll lock up. I don't believe DC will be found guilty of the highest charged offense of 2nd degree murder.
This post was edited on 4/10/21 at 4:29 pm
Posted on 4/10/21 at 4:28 pm to DaleGribblesMower
quote:
Cops, as a general rule, are fairly low-IQ individuals.
On average slightly above normal.
Average IQ nationally of 104.
LINK
Posted on 4/10/21 at 4:37 pm to LightMerchant
A cop has either beat that dude's arse or fricked his wife
Posted on 4/10/21 at 4:40 pm to davyjones
quote:
But as a matter of the legal parameters of this trial, it's not necessarily a factor, besides the hairy issue of cause of death, of course. But
Nelson has made the meth/Fentynal a major factor in the trial.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 4:45 pm to supadave3
quote:
was just stating that it seems like he could have tried something, his nonchalantness was callous and is uncomfortable, at the very least. A guy under his
You're using hindsight to make they statement. Floyd fought back, the cops asked NUMEROUS times what he was on and called for medical not once but twice. Then add in the crowd starting to build and get verbally aggressive. If the criminal lies about being on anything and fights you back while you also have to worry about the crowd what exactly could Chauvin have done?
Absolutely nothing and to suggest other wise is extremely disingenuous.
Tell me how a cop is supposed to know you have heart disease with blockage and covid on top of 3 different drugs, 2 that could be fatal, without knowing anything about the perp.
This post was edited on 4/10/21 at 4:48 pm
Posted on 4/10/21 at 4:46 pm to cubsfan5150
If only he had the Internet, he could have taken 5 seconds to look it up.
Popular
Back to top



1





