- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:00 pm to GEAUXmedic
those glasses must be a fark... just a bad photoshop job, right?
no one (esp. with that face) really saw that pair of glasses on the rack... tried them on... looked in a mirror and said "oh yeah that's the look I'm after"
right?????????
no one (esp. with that face) really saw that pair of glasses on the rack... tried them on... looked in a mirror and said "oh yeah that's the look I'm after"
right?????????
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:00 pm to OldmanBeasley
quote:
Yea that is inaccurate
Well it is Yahoo news. No wonder they disabled the comment section
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:12 pm to Tigerbait357
So U.S. News is lying. And when the video becomes available of what he said precisely in this article, you’ll claim that didn’t happen either, right? I’ll post the video when it’s up. So when it backs up exactly what I said he said, what’s your comeback then?
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:13 pm to Geekboy
quote:
Geekboy
This thread is one of the few good ones. Take your tantrum somewhere else.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:14 pm to Geekboy
Clearly you did not watch the testimony.
The L.A. expert benefited the defense after cross.
The L.A. expert benefited the defense after cross.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:15 pm to TigersSEC2010
It’s not a tantrum. You guys claim to deal in facts but when I present facts it pisses you off.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:15 pm to Geekboy
We literally heard what he said. We don't need to rely on biased news articles to paraphrase.
Notice that the portion you underlined regarding the neck is NOT a direct quote.
Hmmmmm
Notice that the portion you underlined regarding the neck is NOT a direct quote.
Hmmmmm
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:16 pm to JodyPlauche
quote:
The L.A. expert benefited the defense after cross.
The prosecution has to know this, that Nelson high-jacks EVERY SINGLE one of their witnesses. At what point do you realize you're doing your case harm by putting these people on the stand?
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:16 pm to Geekboy
quote:
when I present facts it pisses you off.
I don't think you know what facts are
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:18 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Notice that the portion you underlined regarding the neck is NOT a direct quote.
Seriously, would you happen to know what your intelligence quotient is?
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:19 pm to Geekboy
quote:
So U.S. News is lying. And when the video becomes available of what he said precisely in this article, you’ll claim that didn’t happen either, right? I’ll post the video when it’s up. So when it backs up exactly what I said he said, what’s your comeback then?

Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:19 pm to Fun Bunch
If nobody would respond to his bait things will run more smoothly in this thread.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:20 pm to JDPndahizzy
quote:There is really nothing else they can do. Their case is weak.
The prosecution has to know this, that Nelson high-jacks EVERY SINGLE one of their witnesses. At what point do you realize you're doing your case harm by putting these people on the stand?
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:20 pm to Geekboy
This thread is about the facts of the trial, not what a news website says. Please leave cause you're just trolling at this point. Maybe if we all start reporting his posts he will get banned from the thread.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:24 pm to GEAUXmedic
Does this get to the point where the judge gives a direct verdict to save the jury?
The media is praising Nelson and are turning the script towards the " we were fed false information ". Up until now the prosecution has proven nothing and there is more reasonable doubt than ever.
The media is praising Nelson and are turning the script towards the " we were fed false information ". Up until now the prosecution has proven nothing and there is more reasonable doubt than ever.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:24 pm to GEAUXmedic
When I post the video backing up what I said and showed you, that won’t be enough? You’re pissed because what I’m posting is accurate. So I’ll get banned for backing up what I’m saying. If the website was Fox News would you be okay with that?
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:25 pm to SOSFAN
I think Nelson has done a masterful job but is pissing in the wind uphill.
This jury is almost certainly beyond fearful for their lives if they acquit and will convict him of something no matter what.
But he shouldn't be based on the prosecutions case.
Nelson is trying this for the Appeals Court more than he is for the Jury.
This jury is almost certainly beyond fearful for their lives if they acquit and will convict him of something no matter what.
But he shouldn't be based on the prosecutions case.
Nelson is trying this for the Appeals Court more than he is for the Jury.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:25 pm to Geekboy
quote:
If the website was Fox News would you be okay with that?
No, we don't need an opinion or retelling. We are watching the trial and discussing it. Which if you are not, go create your own thread for discussing other shite.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:26 pm to SOSFAN
quote:I hope not.
Does this get to the point where the judge gives a direct verdict to save the jury?
I've had enough subterfuge with this trial, the Burn Loot Murder movement and all the rest of it. I say let the jury do their job.
Popular
Back to top



0






