- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dan Carlin Hardcore History Addendum - History on Fire
Posted on 6/29/19 at 6:21 pm to upgrayedd
Posted on 6/29/19 at 6:21 pm to upgrayedd
You're just digging the hole deeper in showing how dumb and uneducated you are.
I forgot I was supposed to be ignoring you but when you posted that which shows just how uneducated you are on the subject I just couldn't resist.
I forgot I was supposed to be ignoring you but when you posted that which shows just how uneducated you are on the subject I just couldn't resist.
Posted on 6/29/19 at 6:23 pm to Sun God
quote:
You knew exactly what you were doing when you posted that “it’s amazing how far right the country has shifted” line earlier
Who, me?

Posted on 6/29/19 at 6:24 pm to EarlyCuyler3
quote:
You're just digging the hole deeper in showing how dumb and uneducated you are.
You could offer a rebuttal as to why you disagree with what I said, but that would require you to actually take a position
Posted on 6/29/19 at 6:36 pm to EarlyCuyler3
The left right argument is way over dramatized. The better discussion is on authoritarian vs libertarian. The Democrats push toward absolute authoritarian is extremely scary and does remind one of a nazi-like take over.
Posted on 6/29/19 at 6:40 pm to upgrayedd
Here, because I pity you.
The source is Jewish.
quote:
In April, 1920, Hitler advocated that the party should change its name to the National Socialist German Workers Party (NSDAP). Hitler had always been hostile to socialist ideas, especially those that involved racial or sexual equality. However, socialism was a popular political philosophy in Germany after the First World War. This was reflected in the growth in the German Social Democrat Party (SDP), the largest political party in Germany.
The source is Jewish.
Posted on 6/29/19 at 6:42 pm to EarlyCuyler3
Yep but that’s not an original concept. Extreme left and extreme right are both totalitarian there’s not much difference for the average citizen under either regime.
Posted on 6/29/19 at 6:42 pm to BlackPawnMartyr
quote:
The left right argument is way over dramatized. The better discussion is on authoritarian vs libertarian. The Democrats push toward absolute authoritarian is extremely scary and does remind one of a nazi-like take over.
I agree. I still like the liberty vs statism due to the inherent admission of reduction of liberty by the state.
It is reminiscent, though both sides use the same techniques. It still doesnt change the reality that Nazism is right wing, no matter how mad it makes these posters.
Posted on 6/29/19 at 6:44 pm to TigerMond84
quote:
Yep but that’s not an original concept. Extreme left and extreme right are both totalitarian there’s not much difference for the average citizen under either regime.
Agreed. I dont think he was trying to say it was original though.
Posted on 6/29/19 at 6:48 pm to EarlyCuyler3
So tell me how conservative Hitler was fiscally then. You yourself stated that this country has shifted further right recently.
Nothing in there says anything about Hitler’s economic policy.
Nothing in there says anything about Hitler’s economic policy.
Posted on 6/29/19 at 6:53 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
Must I spoon feed you everything?
quote:
In an attempt to obtain financial contributions from industrialists, Hitler wrote a pamphlet in 1927 entitled The Road to Resurgence. Only a small number of these pamphlets were printed and they were only meant for the eyes of the top industrialists in Germany. The reason that the pamphlet was kept secret was that it contained information that would have upset Hitler's working-class supporters. In the pamphlet Hitler implied that the anti-capitalist measures included in the original twenty-five points of the NSDAP programme would not be implemented if he gained power.
Posted on 6/29/19 at 6:55 pm to EarlyCuyler3
That’s great and all, but what did he actually do economically when he gained power?
Posted on 6/29/19 at 7:05 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
Sigh. You tell me. Nothing I ever say is good enough. Better yet, listen to the podcast and let someone much smarter and educated than I explain it to you.
Posted on 6/29/19 at 7:06 pm to EarlyCuyler3
Props for the great gif usage
Posted on 6/29/19 at 7:08 pm to EarlyCuyler3
quote:
In April, 1920, Hitler advocated that the party should change its name to the National Socialist German Workers Party (NSDAP). Hitler had always been hostile to socialist ideas, especially those that involved racial or sexual equality. However, socialism was a popular political philosophy in Germany after the First World War. This was reflected in the growth in the German Social Democrat Party (SDP), the largest political party in Germany.
As I quoted earlier:
quote:
Socialism is a range of economic and social systems characterised by social ownership of the means of production
You think the government wasn't in control of the economy under Hitler?
quote:
What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners. De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.
LINK
This post was edited on 6/29/19 at 7:10 pm
Posted on 6/29/19 at 7:10 pm to EarlyCuyler3
No, bullshite, the burden of proof is on you. You’re the one claiming that this country has gone further right and that Hitler was to the right economically.
Posted on 6/29/19 at 7:13 pm to upgrayedd
It's pretty simple. Were the Nazis facist?
Posted on 6/29/19 at 7:14 pm to EarlyCuyler3
quote:
It's amazing how far right this country has shifted.
Posted on 6/29/19 at 7:14 pm to EarlyCuyler3
This thread is a dumpster fire of terror
Popular
Back to top


1




