- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/8/16 at 9:16 am to Chad504boy
quote:
If there was a peaceful predominant white group that was peaceful and had good intentions of freeing the white people oppression of today's liberal political movement and it was indirectly associated with a side bar of white trash doing evil acts, you bet your fricking arse there would be no political segregation between the two groups.
Which is flat out wrong. Are we supposed to just run with it?
Posted on 7/8/16 at 9:16 am to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
As far as I'm concerned anyone who even sympathizes with that group is a racist terrorist that deserves to have their brain matter sprayed across the wall just like anyone who sympathized with ISIS.
GT, I understand you're pissed off (I am too) at what happened last night bro but your comments are not appropriate.
Posted on 7/8/16 at 9:16 am to 13SaintTiger
quote:
Which is flat out wrong
Aren't all cops being linked to the shootings?
Posted on 7/8/16 at 9:19 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
Reposting...dead shooter identified.
LINK
#Breaking: Dallas gunman is ID'ed as Micah X. Johnson, 25. No known criminal history or ties to terror groups.
LINK
#Breaking: Dallas gunman is ID'ed as Micah X. Johnson, 25. No known criminal history or ties to terror groups.
Posted on 7/8/16 at 9:20 am to Bunta
quote:
Micah X. Johnson
Interesting...
Posted on 7/8/16 at 9:20 am to 13SaintTiger
That's exactly my point dude. You can't say this guy wasn't a part of BLM. All we can base it off of is his words, which were identical to BLM, except for the fact that he wanted to kill cops.
Although I've seen a ton of posts on social media advocating killing cops with the hashtag ending with #BLM
Although I've seen a ton of posts on social media advocating killing cops with the hashtag ending with #BLM
Posted on 7/8/16 at 9:21 am to Tdot_RiverDawg
quote:
Interesting...
probably Xavier or something, there is a period after it so its his initial, not "X"
Posted on 7/8/16 at 9:23 am to Theboot32
Have they had enough time to clean his Twitter pages?
Posted on 7/8/16 at 9:23 am to cas4t
Can we get this thread back to info about the event please. Too hard to scroll through all the other stuff. Y'all make another thread about something y'all want to debate. Thanks
Posted on 7/8/16 at 9:24 am to tigerskin
Fair enough
Pics of dude yet?
Pics of dude yet?
Posted on 7/8/16 at 9:24 am to Tdot_RiverDawg
quote:
Micah X. Johnson
none of the major news organizations have published that name...could this be a hoax?
Is that the "REAL" LA Times twitter handle?
Posted on 7/8/16 at 9:25 am to tigerskin
it has surprisingly stayed fairly relevant to the original topic
Posted on 7/8/16 at 9:25 am to Bunta
If you zoom in on his profile picture, both vehicles have TX license plates.


This post was edited on 7/8/16 at 9:27 am
Posted on 7/8/16 at 9:27 am to ThatMakesSense
quote:
BLM is the violent hand of the NAACP.
BLM's sole purpose is to stir shite up on election years to increase black voter turnout in tight races.
Everyone who has been paying attention to politics knew there would be an "incident" drawing protests (violent and controversial enough) to capture media attention this summer. That's by design.
It's tragic that the rhetoric and BLM movement has now inspired an attack on police officers......and in a city that hasn't had a police shooting.
This post was edited on 7/8/16 at 9:29 am
Posted on 7/8/16 at 9:28 am to Golfer
I found what's prob his IG page but could have been created recently as a faux page
Posted on 7/8/16 at 9:28 am to Golfer
So was it a long sniper/gunman? Or were there 4 like everyone thought last night? Or 1 shooter with accomplices?
Posted on 7/8/16 at 9:29 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
They don't have to shoot into the crowd. They were certainly firing at the shooters, and there could easily have been ricochets. For you to just say unequivocally that there is no way anyone but the shooters hit protesters is asinine.
I had to search intensely over the last 6 pages but I found a post of yours with which I agree. They returned fire in those videos, or at least it sounded like the did in the initial shootout. If the shooter was elevated and at a distance as has been reported, I think it's reasonable to assume some of the police fire was spray and pray for lack of a better phrase. I don't blame them in the chaos, but it's plausible an innocent civilian could have been hit.
Posted on 7/8/16 at 9:29 am to semotruman
According to news outlets, 4 people total. He was the last one left as he was on a standoff. The other 3 were arrested and not cooperating.
Popular
Back to top


1







