
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Daily Mail: Noah’s Ark resting place 100% confirmed
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:07 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:07 pm to hawgfaninc
This isn't new. They have been studying this formation for decades.
David Fasold originally thought that it could be the Ark, but eventually studied it enough and concluded that it was a natural geologic formation.
David Fasold originally thought that it could be the Ark, but eventually studied it enough and concluded that it was a natural geologic formation.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:08 pm to hawgfaninc
GOD is good and faithful
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:11 pm to Dr RC
quote:
Daily Droppings: hawgfaninc doesn't read full articles 100% confirmed
Dr RC doesn’t realize the title is verbatim from daily mail, as the title in the op states
Lulz @ dr rc
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:12 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
Noah's Ark resting place '100% confirmed' after 4,300 years
quote:
Jones acknowledged the evidence has not definitively identified the formation as the biblical vessel.
quote:
But he added: 'I firmly believe the Durupinar Formation represents the buried remains of Noah's Ark.'

Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:13 pm to hawgfaninc
I could have sworn I saw this rig down in Dulac.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:14 pm to hawgfaninc
It's a clickbait article title. All they've "confirmed" is that it's not a geological structure, as it says in the article.
quote:
Now, an international team examining the Durupinar Formation near Mount Ararat claims it has '100 percent confirmed' that the mound is not a natural geological feature but a 'man-made object.'
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:14 pm to hawgfaninc
Lord, what’s a cubit?
Noah (probably)
Noah (probably)
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:19 pm to NoBoDawg
quote:
quote: Noah’s ark isn’t real. It’s not?
Don't engage with him. He dislikes anything Judeo-Christian.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:19 pm to hawgfaninc
Oh ok.
You just went w/the click bait headline to make sure nobody thought you were twisting the article. Sure sure sure.
You just went w/the click bait headline to make sure nobody thought you were twisting the article. Sure sure sure.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:20 pm to hawgfaninc
I thought it was in Kentucky
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:21 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:
All they've "confirmed" is that it's not a geological structure
They haven’t even confirmed that. Testing done on this formation back in the 1990s confirmed that it was a natural geological formation.
This post was edited on 9/23/26 at 2:24 pm
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:22 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
the founder of Noah's Ark Scans who has investigated the area for nearly 30 years
so they've been investigating this giant boat-shaped area for 30 years and are only just now looking underneath and found it? dafuq they been doing up til now?
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:23 pm to mattz1122
quote:
I thought it was in Kentucky
It is, I have a Tshirt from the gift shop to prove it
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:23 pm to The Pirate King
quote:
Don't engage with him. He dislikes anything Judeo-Christian.
frick off, Pirate King. I don’t even know what a Judeo-Christian thing would be. But I certainly don’t believe in a big boat that carried two of every known animal through a world-wide flood. You can believe your fairy tale if you want to.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:23 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
so they've been investigating this giant boat-shaped area for 30 years and are only just now looking underneath and found it?
I believe I read somewhere that they needed Turkish government cooperation/approval and finally got it.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:26 pm to Mo Jeaux
I sure will. And when you die you can take that up with God.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:27 pm to The Pirate King
quote:
I believe I read somewhere that they needed Turkish government cooperation/approval and finally got it.
You’ll believe anything.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:28 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
They haven’t even confirmed that. Testing done on this formation back in the 1990s confirmed that it was a natural geological formation.
Of all the insanity that goes along with this particular long standing bit of crazy, my personal favorite part has always been that's it's allegedly "deep underground", yet somehow that's supposed to have caused this massive "boat shaped" rock formation. That's not how sediment accumulation works, but I suppose we can't let that get in the way of a good grift
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:28 pm to Dr RC
This article will change zero minds.
Those who don’t want it to be true will ignore any evidence that points toward being anything more than a natural geologic phenomenon.,
Those who want it to be true will ignore anything that casts doubt on this team’s claims.
When all is said and done, this thread will be 7-10 pages of a lot of arguments and insults with little to no open-minded discussion.
FWIW, I find the evidence they’ve uncovered intriguing. This could possibly be the actual ark from the Bible. Am I ready to declare that this is definitively it? No. But I do see it as between possible to likely based on the evidence laid out in the article.
Those who don’t want it to be true will ignore any evidence that points toward being anything more than a natural geologic phenomenon.,
Those who want it to be true will ignore anything that casts doubt on this team’s claims.
When all is said and done, this thread will be 7-10 pages of a lot of arguments and insults with little to no open-minded discussion.
FWIW, I find the evidence they’ve uncovered intriguing. This could possibly be the actual ark from the Bible. Am I ready to declare that this is definitively it? No. But I do see it as between possible to likely based on the evidence laid out in the article.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:28 pm to notiger1997
quote:
Seems like we get this every six months.
Its because their funding runs out, so they have to push these headlines out to scam more people into funding them for another year.

Popular
Back to top



1















