Started By
Message

re: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) ***W.H.O. DECLARES A GLOBAL PANDEMIC***

Posted on 5/16/20 at 8:42 pm to
Posted by MusclesofBrussels
Member since Dec 2015
5034 posts
Posted on 5/16/20 at 8:42 pm to
TD's elite scientists are far superior to Ioannidis and shite on his studies.
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 5/16/20 at 8:45 pm to
The Santa Clara paper. There are links to the revised version in the article. There really aren’t any major changes to their conclusions.
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
40966 posts
Posted on 5/16/20 at 8:47 pm to
Interesting considering how much shite he got for that and questioning if he had finally become what he had always pointed out in faulty research.

He's either doubling down on being really wrong the first time in his career or he's right. What odds does anyone want to take on that
This post was edited on 5/16/20 at 8:49 pm
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
21626 posts
Posted on 5/17/20 at 10:36 am to
Overall, good news as Hospitalization and Deaths continue to decline in the US, R0 is approaching 1 and we haven't seen an explosion of new cases in areas that have started to lift restrictions

Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9609 posts
Posted on 5/17/20 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

R0 is approaching 1



Where is a good website to look for R0 statistics for all the US?
Posted by escatawpabuckeye
Member since Jan 2013
1056 posts
Posted on 5/17/20 at 5:11 pm to
How much of that effect is related to NYC alone?

That is, if you removed nyc’s numbers, where would the rest of the country be trending?
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 5/17/20 at 5:30 pm to
Probably going up then it’s going to come down just like New York. I wouldn’t be surprised if the area under every curve is proportional to population density. I would love to see an analysis of that.
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9609 posts
Posted on 5/17/20 at 5:32 pm to
Recently, NYC is one of the main places fueling the downward trend.

NYC still has a lot of cases but it's been well under 1% daily increase for a while. Much better than many other areas of the country.

Some recent places I've seen mentioned as currently trending up statistically were North Carolina, Minnesota and Maryland. Illinois, Virginia and Texas as well in the past couple of weeks.

This post was edited on 5/17/20 at 6:25 pm
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
21138 posts
Posted on 5/17/20 at 7:14 pm to
The R value right now is way under 1. Today marks 13 straight days where the national number of new cases is smaller than the same day the previous week.

Today also makes the 9th straight day where the number of deaths was lower than the same day of the previous week.

There were a shocking 422,024 new tests today, by far a new record and the first-ever day with over 400,000.

That makes for a positive test rate of only 5%.

The data would seem to validate my belief that we are eliminating COVID-19.

LINK

Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 5/17/20 at 8:55 pm to
quote:

we are eliminating COVID-19.


Posted by Ronaldo Burgundiaz
NWA
Member since Jan 2012
6795 posts
Posted on 5/17/20 at 9:23 pm to
There's a storm brewing:

Colorado Sun - Nearly a quarter of the people Colorado said died from coronavirus don’t have COVID-19 on their death certificate

quote:

 In a separate report by CBS4, Montezuma County Coroner George Deavers said CDPHE classified an alcohol-poisoning death in his county as a coronavirus death


This post was edited on 5/17/20 at 9:53 pm
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 5/17/20 at 10:21 pm to
Just imagine the kind of shite that’s happening in New York
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9609 posts
Posted on 5/17/20 at 10:24 pm to
All kind of absurd how much posturing over death counts there is. There will never be utterly precise counts since just like someone with heart problems who has a heart attack after being in auto accident, there's gray area with a percentage of cases.

The best idea is probably just looking at average death rates.

Colorado, for example,

"In 2019, 6,761 people died in Colorado during those two months (March and April), but this year the number of deaths in that same time frame increased by 1,341 to an estimated 8,102 deaths. "


Not too big of a conspiracy since deaths would seem to be in general neighborhood of the estimates.


https://www.denverpost.com/2020/05/15/coronavirus-covid-deaths-colorado/
Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
14204 posts
Posted on 5/18/20 at 8:10 am to
quote:

All kind of absurd how much posturing over death counts there is.


Not really. How hard is it? Like the governor of Colorado said, no one cares how many died with Covid. Lets just stick to how many died of it. And the attending physician at the time of death is the one to make that call.

There is a lot of frickery going on with these counts. If you don't understand that, then I don't know what else to say.

Edit: Oh, and if you want to compare mortality stats, wait until the end of the year and then compare 2020 with prior years. I am interested to see how those numbers come out.
This post was edited on 5/18/20 at 8:18 am
Posted by klrstix
Shreveport, LA
Member since Oct 2006
3631 posts
Posted on 5/18/20 at 8:49 am to
quote:


All kind of absurd how much posturing over death counts there is. There will never be utterly precise counts...


I partly agree with you take.. there will never be "precise" counts...

However.. The question/issue of deliberately padding the numbers is not absurd imo..

Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9609 posts
Posted on 5/18/20 at 9:47 am to
quote:

There is a lot of frickery going on with these counts.
quote:

if you want to compare mortality stats



I do want to compare the mortality stats.

It seems to be the best way to get a clear --if not exact to the number-- idea.


It's just common sense to think that if Colorado has 1300+ extra deaths at a time when many causes like auto accidents etc will likely be lower that a hypothetical perfect count may find:

1. 200 cases to subtract where a co-morbity like cancer is a more compelling cause

2. But would also be adding just that many, if not more, that have not been counted of people dying at home without a test.



NYC, for another example, had around 2000 extra deaths just for April not attributed to Covid in the official count.

Many people are dying at home since it seems agreed upon by about everyone at this point that a lot of Covid deaths follow the pattern of being sick but not seeming critical and taking a sudden turn.

You do realize that a better argument can be made that overall Covid deaths are generally being under counted if anything?
This post was edited on 5/18/20 at 9:57 am
Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
25958 posts
Posted on 5/18/20 at 10:04 am to
quote:

NYC, for another example, had around 2000 extra deaths just for April not attributed to Covid in the official count.

Many people are dying at home since it seems agreed upon by about everyone at this point that a lot of Covid deaths follow the pattern of being sick but not seeming critical and taking a sudden turn.

You do realize that a better argument can be made that overall Covid deaths are generally being under counted if anything?


Maybe some of those are CoviD deaths, but many will likely come out to be not seeking treatment for something they normally would have out of the fear promoted by CoviD.
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
5641 posts
Posted on 5/18/20 at 10:09 am to
quote:

NYC, for another example, had around 2000 extra deaths just for April not attributed to Covid in the official count. Many people are dying at home since it seems agreed upon by about everyone at this point that a lot of Covid deaths follow the pattern of being sick but not seeming critical and taking a sudden turn. You do realize that a better argument can be made that overall Covid deaths are generally being under counted if anything?


People are dying because the healthcare system has been disrupted by the shutdown policies. If you drastically reduce the availability of health care, and at the same time tell people to stay in their homes to avoid getting a deadly virus, then you're absolutely going to see an increase in deaths due to the regular prevalence of hundreds of diseases. That would have happened if we'd done these lockdown procedures as a trial run without any virus.

Older people in particular don't do well in an environment of isolation and restricted access to health care; they heavily depend on regular monitoring and care from public and private support systems.
This post was edited on 5/18/20 at 10:16 am
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9609 posts
Posted on 5/18/20 at 10:33 am to
My point has not been that no "extra" deaths compared to average were not a regular heart attack of someone that didn't want or didn't have regular access to an ambulance.

My point is that this is certainly not all of the extra deaths. Common sense dictates that some, likely many, of those are also due to Covid.

So, naming only cases here and there that may be a stretch to attribute to Covid effaces the point that there are likely many more that should be attributed to Covid.
Posted by BRIllini07
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2015
3211 posts
Posted on 5/18/20 at 10:57 am to
quote:

Where is a good website to look for R0 statistics for all the US?


rt.live
first pageprev pagePage 1107 of 1190Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram