Started By
Message

re: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) ***W.H.O. DECLARES A GLOBAL PANDEMIC***

Posted on 4/19/20 at 9:12 am to
Posted by FearlessFreep
Baja Alabama
Member since Nov 2009
20219 posts
Posted on 4/19/20 at 9:12 am to
quote:

I’m sure that site has aids
If you knew anything about the guy who runs it, you’d know it’s likely the only site on the web that doesn’t have aids
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85713 posts
Posted on 4/19/20 at 9:24 am to
quote:

f you knew anything about the guy who runs it, you’d know it’s likely the only site on the web that doesn’t have aids



Tell him to get a less aidsy looking site

Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
40251 posts
Posted on 4/19/20 at 9:30 am to
I think Birx said in the pic yesterday that pui are being counted. ??
Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
40251 posts
Posted on 4/19/20 at 9:34 am to
But if you retest as positive does it mean you’re contagious?? The guy from the cruise ship tested positive like three weeks and more after originally diagnosis. The rna/whatever was still shedding let the tv report.

Do we know (how would we know) if a follow up positive = contagious??
Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
14209 posts
Posted on 4/19/20 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Diamond Princess nCFR is now 1.8%
I believe it’s 1.97% now (14 deaths out of 712 cases).



If the number is 1.97% for a population group that old, what is it for the general population? .5%? .25%?
Posted by BRIllini07
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2015
3211 posts
Posted on 4/19/20 at 9:44 am to
The general population will still include old people, and it will include people too old to go on a cruise. And it will still include the large chunk of obese with uncontrolled comorbidities.

Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77889 posts
Posted on 4/19/20 at 9:56 am to
quote:

The general population will still include old people, and it will include people too old to go on a cruise. And it will still include the large chunk of obese with uncontrolled comorbidities.

But the number is impacted by the number of younger, non-obese, individuals without comorbidities.

That drives the number down.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85713 posts
Posted on 4/19/20 at 10:23 am to
quote:

But the number is impacted by the number of younger, non-obese, individuals without comorbidities.


Hence why IMO, this isn’t any more deadly than the Flu. The Flu is more likely to kill younger and healthier than this is proving to be.

Have said that, this is more contagious.

However, once we have a vaccine, this thing will be a blip on the radar.
Posted by BRIllini07
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2015
3211 posts
Posted on 4/19/20 at 10:24 am to
True, but I think US cfr will struggle to get down below 0.5 percent due to that. I get the impression on the OT that when many post “general population” they’re subtracting a substantial chunk out of the denominator.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77889 posts
Posted on 4/19/20 at 10:26 am to
quote:

I get the impression on the OT that when many post “general population” they’re subtracting a substantial chunk out of the denominator.
It is actually the exact opposite.

It is an addition of a large chunk that is currently removed from the denominator because we don’t know everyone who has had the disease.

Currently, we only know a small number who has the disease.

By applying the general population concept, you are adding an assumed number of undiagnosed/asymptomatic patients that exist.
This post was edited on 4/19/20 at 11:17 am
Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
40251 posts
Posted on 4/19/20 at 11:06 am to

We have 77 residents in the nursing home where I work .. more than 20% of our people have tested positive and three are now in the hospital; one recorded fatality thus far.

My heart is so sad for them and their families.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 4/19/20 at 11:23 am to
South Carolina will allow nonessential retail stores to reopen on Tuesday.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53552 posts
Posted on 4/19/20 at 11:25 am to
LA getting another bad look on the viral inter webs:

Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85713 posts
Posted on 4/19/20 at 11:53 am to
quote:

LA getting another bad look on the viral inter webs:


What’s that bad about it?
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53552 posts
Posted on 4/19/20 at 12:49 pm to
Seriously? Killing most benefits included previously garnered PTO?

Changing vacation time to unpaid time off?

Wouldn’t be surprised if even the baseline commission was actually higher
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85713 posts
Posted on 4/19/20 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Seriously? Killing most benefits included previously garnered PTO?

Changing vacation time to unpaid time off?


Guess you haven’t kept up with what other companies are doing... no bonus, no 401k, no vacation, mandatory 20-50% salary decreases, etc..

It’s not that drastic. Everyone has a choice, don’t work there then

You advocating they should be fired instead?
This post was edited on 4/19/20 at 1:19 pm
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53552 posts
Posted on 4/19/20 at 1:22 pm to
quote:


Guess you haven’t kept up with what other companies are doing... no bonus, no 401k, no vacation, mandatory 20-50% salary decreases, etc..


I guess I’m just sheltered then.

My place of business as basically did the opposite. Benefits not only remained, but they guanranteed pay for corona related events/shutdowns.

Peers at other companies have been offered 4 figure bonuses if they collectively can avoid getting sick and keeping the facility operational for the duration.
This post was edited on 4/19/20 at 1:33 pm
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47827 posts
Posted on 4/19/20 at 1:27 pm to
I work for a DoD contractor which is fairly insulated from COVID-19, or so I thought. We've recently been told that our parent company has taken on huge losses (from what, I'm not sure exactly) and they plan on cutting "indirect costs" and to "be prepared" because "everything is on the table"

Guess I'll stay tuned to what that means.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85713 posts
Posted on 4/19/20 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

Peers at other companies have been offered 4 figure bonuses if they collectively can avoid getting sick and keeping the facility operational for the duration


You’re 100% sheltered... I know of nobody in Houston or in my network getting that treatment. Most have been furloughed and/or been forced to take 25% salary reductions in the interim.

Things are bad, especially for small business since congress won’t find the PPP further. It’s either major cost cutting or layoffs.
This post was edited on 4/19/20 at 1:31 pm
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
79518 posts
Posted on 4/19/20 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

My place of business as basically did the opposite. Before not only remained, but they guanranteed pay for corona related events/shutdowns.

Peers at other companies have been offered 4 figure bonuses if they collectively can avoid getting sick and keeping the facility operational for the duration.


Those are extremely rare circumstances.

Very few industries have seen an uptick in demand during all of this.
first pageprev pagePage 1064 of 1190Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram