Started By
Message

re: CNN - it was “unfortunate” that cadets weren’t actually racist

Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:06 pm to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

Eh. Only because they don't go both ways


It's ridiculous to sentence someone more harshly because of unapproved thought
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
172004 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:07 pm to
But that's the law..
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
72198 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

Arrested on what grounds?



A hate crime.

quote:

Defining a Hate Crime
A hate crime is a traditional offense like murder, arson, or vandalism with an added element of bias. For the purposes of collecting statistics, the FBI has defined a hate crime as a “criminal offense against a person or property motivated in whole or in part by an offender’s bias against a race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, ethnicity, gender, or gender identity.” Hate itself is not a crime—and the FBI is mindful of protecting freedom of speech and other civil liberties.


LINK
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

But that's the law..


It's a terrible thought crime law
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
72198 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

It's ridiculous to sentence someone more harshly because of unapproved thought



jesus christ roger.

I understand your opinion, and agree with it.

But this is already a law. That is the point.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
72198 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

It's a terrible thought crime law



yes

we understand

but the point is that for the same crime, a white kid would be charged with a hate crime, no matter your opinion on hate crimes

Posted by rondo
Worst. Poster. Evar.
Member since Jan 2004
77520 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

suggesting it was “unfortunate” that cadets weren’t actually racist.



if thats what you took from what she said...you're a bigger idiot than I thought.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

But this is already a law. That is the point.


So you think this kid should be charged with a thought crime? Even though it's on the books, it would be ridiculous
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
45204 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

Arrested on what grounds?
Hate crime
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91874 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

Arrested on what grounds?

A hate crime.


Okay, but what is the underlining crime? Vandalism for writing on a dry erase board?

I'm not being intentionally obtuse, I'm asking sincerely.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
172004 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:11 pm to
How is that thought crime? An action is taken. Writing go home n word isn't a thought, it's an action.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

How is that thought crime? An action is taken. Writing go home n word isn't a thought, it's an action.


Writing isn't a crime, it's the thought behind it. "Hate" isn't an action.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
172004 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

Hate" isn't an action.


Writing down hate speech is an action dude. No one is charged for what they think unless they express it.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
72198 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

Vandalism for writing on a dry erase board?


I'm sure that's what they would have charged the white kid with.

I don't disagree on your views on hate crimes. We are on the same page. I'm simply saying it should go both ways.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
72198 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

Writing isn't a crime, it's the thought behind it. "Hate" isn't an action.





"thinking" about racist things isn't a crime. Actually writing them down in a public place with a clear intention is.

I agree hate crime should just be crime. But you certainly can act out on that hate.
This post was edited on 11/10/17 at 1:21 pm
Posted by RPC4LSU
Thibodaux, LA
Member since Jan 2006
2072 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:20 pm to
What is truly unfortunate, is that they have known it was a hoax since about a week or less after it happened. Why did they wait a month and a half to break the news?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

Writing down hate speech is an action dude


Hate is not an action. It's a thought or emotion.

Hate crimes prosecute above the level of an action because of thoughts or emotions
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
72198 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

Hate is not an action. It's a thought or emotion.



acting out on that hate is an action. And that is why this crime has this particular name. You can argue the semantics on what to call it all you want, but it doesn't make you right.

you have a thought, hate.
then you commit a crime based on those thoughts.

it's just a way to assign a crime to acting out on racism.
This post was edited on 11/10/17 at 1:26 pm
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
42784 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:23 pm to
Wasn’t the cadet expelled?
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
72198 posts
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:24 pm to
correct

the argument is that if this were proven to be a white kid, if he would have been charged with a crime- a hate crime. If so, does that mean this individual should as well?
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram