Started By
Message

re: CNBC: Supertankers could change the US Oil export game

Posted on 2/13/18 at 10:00 pm to
Posted by Strannix
C.S.A.
Member since Dec 2012
54230 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 10:00 pm to
Imagine the ship nuts on that bad boy
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
33146 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

Imagine the ship nuts on that bad boy



It's a big arse boat.

That tracker link has some interesting stuff on it. There's a big one docked at Port of Baton Rouge now with lots of photos.
This post was edited on 2/13/18 at 10:03 pm
Posted by LSU0358
Member since Jan 2005
8187 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 10:02 pm to
Refined products generally aren’t put in supertankers. They tend to be in an Aframax size ship or smaller.

The US is a net refined product exporter, and will remain so for a long time.
This post was edited on 2/13/18 at 10:04 pm
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
139229 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

The US is a net refined product exporter, and will remain so for a long time.



Don't we basically supply all of Mexico since they have no refining there?
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
79876 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 10:05 pm to
quote:

The US is a net refined product exporter, and will remain so for a long time.


Unless something huge changes. Like allowing the export of crude oil....

Say you have a billion dollars to open a new refinery, where would you do it?
Posted by LSU0358
Member since Jan 2005
8187 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 10:06 pm to
We send a lot of product to Mexico, not sure on % of consumption we send.

Central and South America in general seem to have a tough time keeping refineries online and on spec.
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
36806 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 10:06 pm to
quote:


Say you have a billion dollars to open a new refinery, where would you do it?



Wait for Saban to die, build over his grave
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
79876 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 10:07 pm to
quote:

Central and South America in general seem to have a tough time keeping refineries online and on spec.



Lack of automation and engineering. Which we will be exporting soon.
Posted by NorthEndZone
Member since Dec 2008
14622 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 10:09 pm to
The Jahre Viking, later named the Knock Nevis was huge.

Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
139229 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 10:13 pm to
quote:

Lack of automation and engineering. Which we will be exporting soon.

I would imagine the local and national corruption has a good bit to do with it too. Hell, the only way Mexico could keep it's oil production nationalized was when crude prices were sky high. They had to privatize once it dropped.
Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 10:14 pm to
The history is interesting
Posted by Captain Crackysack
Member since Oct 2017
2231 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

They couldn’t get a pic of the actual boat the article is about?

VLCC is a class of oil tanker. They all look the same.
Posted by Captain Crackysack
Member since Oct 2017
2231 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

What no one realizes is that that ship won't be coming back empty.

VLCCs and ULCCs only carry crude oil. So it will likely come back empty
Posted by TulaneUVA
Member since Jun 2005
26238 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 10:26 pm to
Lol ain’t nobody 1) putting clean products in a VLCC (that’s 2M of storage which is a ridiculous amount of diesel/mogas and 2) the cleaning costs to swap from crude to clean products would be outrageous and prohibitive.

It may come back with another crude that we want here for qualities or another attractive element (Persian gulf, etc).
This post was edited on 2/13/18 at 10:27 pm
Posted by Captain Crackysack
Member since Oct 2017
2231 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 10:30 pm to
VLCCs and ULCCs couldn't carry clean product unless they got overhauled at the shipyard. They literally were not built to handle anything but crude
This post was edited on 2/13/18 at 10:30 pm
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 10:30 pm to
quote:

fricking stupid move.


LOL what?

Posted by Lou Pai
Member since Dec 2014
29644 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

fightin tigers


Idiot liberal lmao
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
135038 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 10:39 pm to
quote:

The tanker, 'Shaden,'

Some baw's wife definitely named that ship


Nah, if that was the case it would be spelled “Shaighdynn”
Posted by Martini
Near Athens
Member since Mar 2005
49697 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 10:57 pm to
Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
32331 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 11:03 pm to
Refining might go offshore, although from the projects I'm seeing, the big boys are mostly beefing up in the US. Petrochemical almost all in the US. We can't build crackers fast enough.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram