Started By
Message

re: Catholics to excommunicate priests who follows Washington law about reporting child abuse

Posted on 5/7/25 at 10:42 am to
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
172310 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 10:42 am to
quote:

I bet they wouldn’t be making Muslims tattle tale.

Praying on a rug 12 times a day is less absurd than confession.
Posted by TXGunslinger10
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2011
18051 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 10:54 am to
quote:

But we also have to consider that anything uttered in a confessional might not be true.


So...by this thinking one would lie, which is a sin, and then have to get back in line to come in again and confess the lie?

As a fellow Catholic I agree with your sentiment, but I do not suspect lies to be commonplace in the Sacrament of Jesus' Mercy.
Posted by ibldprplgld
Member since Feb 2008
26143 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 10:57 am to
quote:

That would hold weight if the Catholic church didn't have a very long history of protecting child abusers


Not sure why this was downvoted to oblivion but it’s true.

The Catholic Church has an immense amount of recompense to do over the sex abuse scandal and subsequent coverups.

The Church choosing to dig in on protecting the confessions of child abusers doesn’t advance that agenda at all.
Posted by TD422
Destrehan, LA
Member since Jun 2019
696 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 10:59 am to
quote:

As a fellow Catholic I agree with your sentiment, but I do not suspect lies to be commonplace in the Sacrament of Jesus' Mercy.


You, sir, have more faith in the common man to do the right thing, without question. I take a more realistic approach that someone - they might not even be Catholic - to harm another, anonymously. I applaud your faith in people in that regard. I need to work on that, myself.
Posted by CapitalTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Sep 2019
22 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:01 am to
quote:

The Church choosing to dig in on protecting the confessions of child abusers doesn’t advance that agenda at all.


Just to be clear. The seal of the confessional is not in place to protect confessions of child abusers, or any criminals.
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
20312 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:04 am to
quote:

Not sure why this was downvoted to oblivion but it’s true.

The Catholic Church has an immense amount of recompense to do over the sex abuse scandal and subsequent coverups.

The Church choosing to dig in on protecting the confessions of child abusers doesn’t advance that agenda at all.


This is coming about because the Washington government enacted a law requiring clergy to disclose abuse if it's revealed in confession. The Church will not allow ANYTHING to be disclosed if it was revealed in confession, not just child abuse. WA is forcing their hand on this, it's not that the Church is specifically choosing to defend abusers.

Would we be ok if the government required priests turn in a list of people who cheat on their taxes? Is it ok if California gets rid of attorney-client privilege and makes your lawyer tell the court if you committed the crime or not?
This post was edited on 5/7/25 at 11:06 am
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
23966 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:04 am to
quote:

These people are the scum of the earth


Yes, Washington state government is scum
Posted by BlackAdam
Member since Jan 2016
6877 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:04 am to
quote:

Not sure why this was downvoted to oblivion but it’s true.

The Catholic Church has an immense amount of recompense to do over the sex abuse scandal and subsequent coverups.

The Church choosing to dig in on protecting the confessions of child abusers doesn’t advance that agenda at all.


The protection of child predators is largely a myth. Most of the abuse occurred in the 60s and 70s when the prevailing psychology was that these predators could be treated, and could safely be returned to their work. Many of the families of the abused did not want the abuse to be publicized.

While there was a misguided desire to avoid scandal, there was not a widespread coverup. THe Church was trusting the science,
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
83599 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:07 am to
quote:

While there was a misguided desire to avoid scandal, there was not a widespread coverup. THe Church was trusting the science,


no offense intended baw, but that sounds like an pretty naive take
Posted by GreenRockTiger
vortex to the whirlpool of despair
Member since Jun 2020
53807 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:08 am to
quote:

The Church choosing to dig in on protecting the confessions of child abusers doesn’t advance that agenda at all.
or just look at it for what it really is and the government is interfering in religious matters which is against the Constitution

This sets a terrible precedent - how can a court ever prove what was said in a confessional? This is a path to get good priests put in jail, too. In retrospect, if a child abuser did happen to go to confession (which I doubt) - is the priest now an accomplice?

Most good priests will counsel you and help you find rehabilitation programs, but that’s on the person to follow through. It’s not the priest’s responsibility. There are other ways to get child abuse reported without breaking the seal of confession.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
75103 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:08 am to
I will ask this question again, if we are demanding that priests be a mandated reporter for the safety of children, why are lawyers exempt?

Why shouldn’t they be forced to divulge information that they are told?
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
83599 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:10 am to
quote:

why are lawyers exempt?

Why shouldn’t they be forced to divulge information that they are told?


and journalists, and short pedo docs!!!
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
14838 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:10 am to
quote:

Who is yall?


Yall is all Branch off, Secondary, Tier 2 Christian Churches.

You know, the ones that basically follow all Catholic doctrine outside the principals that are just a little bit too much work for most people.

I find it that everyone loves them a lazy religion. Less kneeling and standing up plus you dont have to do good works.

Who wouldnt want to go to that church? I agree with yall in theory, yalls churches sound more fun but I am not here for fun. I am here for the Lord.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
75103 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:10 am to
quote:

and journalists
Agreed.
quote:

short pedo docs
Scruffy is required.
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
83599 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:12 am to
quote:

Scruffy is required


just messin' witchu baw, how ya dooin' doc?
Posted by AbitaFan08
Boston, MA
Member since Apr 2008
27708 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:13 am to
quote:

I will ask this question again, if we are demanding that priests be a mandated reporter for the safety of children, why are lawyers exempt?


Lawyers are legally required to report a situation where they believe the commitment of a crime is imminent. I don't believe priests have the same requirement. So with respect, Scruffy, not the same situation.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
75706 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:14 am to
quote:

Do they also take an oath not to diddle little kids?


That would fall under the vow of chastity.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
35756 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Confession is so absurd. You don’t need a middle man for forgiveness.


How else was the church centuries ago going to blackmail parishioners into buying their own forgiveness and salvation?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
104493 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Praying on a rug 12 times a day is less absurd than confession.
Arent you a Baptist that went to Parkview? You sure you want to talk about things that don’t make any sense with religion?
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
75103 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Lawyers are legally required to report a situation where they believe the commitment of a crime is imminent.
Are they legally required to report a crime if it has been committed and they were told by a client they they did the crime?
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram