- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Catholics to excommunicate priests who follows Washington law about reporting child abuse
Posted on 5/7/25 at 10:42 am to Swamp Frog x
Posted on 5/7/25 at 10:42 am to Swamp Frog x
quote:
I bet they wouldn’t be making Muslims tattle tale.
Praying on a rug 12 times a day is less absurd than confession.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 10:54 am to TD422
quote:
But we also have to consider that anything uttered in a confessional might not be true.
So...by this thinking one would lie, which is a sin, and then have to get back in line to come in again and confess the lie?
As a fellow Catholic I agree with your sentiment, but I do not suspect lies to be commonplace in the Sacrament of Jesus' Mercy.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 10:57 am to Sterling Archer
quote:
That would hold weight if the Catholic church didn't have a very long history of protecting child abusers
Not sure why this was downvoted to oblivion but it’s true.
The Catholic Church has an immense amount of recompense to do over the sex abuse scandal and subsequent coverups.
The Church choosing to dig in on protecting the confessions of child abusers doesn’t advance that agenda at all.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 10:59 am to TXGunslinger10
quote:
As a fellow Catholic I agree with your sentiment, but I do not suspect lies to be commonplace in the Sacrament of Jesus' Mercy.
You, sir, have more faith in the common man to do the right thing, without question. I take a more realistic approach that someone - they might not even be Catholic - to harm another, anonymously. I applaud your faith in people in that regard. I need to work on that, myself.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:01 am to ibldprplgld
quote:
The Church choosing to dig in on protecting the confessions of child abusers doesn’t advance that agenda at all.
Just to be clear. The seal of the confessional is not in place to protect confessions of child abusers, or any criminals.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:04 am to ibldprplgld
quote:
Not sure why this was downvoted to oblivion but it’s true.
The Catholic Church has an immense amount of recompense to do over the sex abuse scandal and subsequent coverups.
The Church choosing to dig in on protecting the confessions of child abusers doesn’t advance that agenda at all.
This is coming about because the Washington government enacted a law requiring clergy to disclose abuse if it's revealed in confession. The Church will not allow ANYTHING to be disclosed if it was revealed in confession, not just child abuse. WA is forcing their hand on this, it's not that the Church is specifically choosing to defend abusers.
Would we be ok if the government required priests turn in a list of people who cheat on their taxes? Is it ok if California gets rid of attorney-client privilege and makes your lawyer tell the court if you committed the crime or not?
This post was edited on 5/7/25 at 11:06 am
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:04 am to Sterling Archer
quote:
These people are the scum of the earth
Yes, Washington state government is scum
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:04 am to ibldprplgld
quote:
Not sure why this was downvoted to oblivion but it’s true.
The Catholic Church has an immense amount of recompense to do over the sex abuse scandal and subsequent coverups.
The Church choosing to dig in on protecting the confessions of child abusers doesn’t advance that agenda at all.
The protection of child predators is largely a myth. Most of the abuse occurred in the 60s and 70s when the prevailing psychology was that these predators could be treated, and could safely be returned to their work. Many of the families of the abused did not want the abuse to be publicized.
While there was a misguided desire to avoid scandal, there was not a widespread coverup. THe Church was trusting the science,
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:07 am to BlackAdam
quote:
While there was a misguided desire to avoid scandal, there was not a widespread coverup. THe Church was trusting the science,
no offense intended baw, but that sounds like an pretty naive take
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:08 am to ibldprplgld
quote:or just look at it for what it really is and the government is interfering in religious matters which is against the Constitution
The Church choosing to dig in on protecting the confessions of child abusers doesn’t advance that agenda at all.
This sets a terrible precedent - how can a court ever prove what was said in a confessional? This is a path to get good priests put in jail, too. In retrospect, if a child abuser did happen to go to confession (which I doubt) - is the priest now an accomplice?
Most good priests will counsel you and help you find rehabilitation programs, but that’s on the person to follow through. It’s not the priest’s responsibility. There are other ways to get child abuse reported without breaking the seal of confession.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:08 am to Sterling Archer
I will ask this question again, if we are demanding that priests be a mandated reporter for the safety of children, why are lawyers exempt?
Why shouldn’t they be forced to divulge information that they are told?
Why shouldn’t they be forced to divulge information that they are told?
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:10 am to Scruffy
quote:
why are lawyers exempt?
Why shouldn’t they be forced to divulge information that they are told?
and journalists, and short pedo docs!!!
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:10 am to More beer please
quote:
Who is yall?
Yall is all Branch off, Secondary, Tier 2 Christian Churches.
You know, the ones that basically follow all Catholic doctrine outside the principals that are just a little bit too much work for most people.
I find it that everyone loves them a lazy religion. Less kneeling and standing up plus you dont have to do good works.
Who wouldnt want to go to that church? I agree with yall in theory, yalls churches sound more fun but I am not here for fun. I am here for the Lord.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:10 am to 777Tiger
quote:Agreed.
and journalists
quote:Scruffy is required.
short pedo docs

Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:12 am to Scruffy
quote:
Scruffy is required
just messin' witchu baw, how ya dooin' doc?
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:13 am to Scruffy
quote:
I will ask this question again, if we are demanding that priests be a mandated reporter for the safety of children, why are lawyers exempt?
Lawyers are legally required to report a situation where they believe the commitment of a crime is imminent. I don't believe priests have the same requirement. So with respect, Scruffy, not the same situation.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:14 am to More beer please
quote:
Do they also take an oath not to diddle little kids?
That would fall under the vow of chastity.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:15 am to The Boat
quote:
Confession is so absurd. You don’t need a middle man for forgiveness.
How else was the church centuries ago going to blackmail parishioners into buying their own forgiveness and salvation?
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:15 am to The Boat
quote:Arent you a Baptist that went to Parkview? You sure you want to talk about things that don’t make any sense with religion?
Praying on a rug 12 times a day is less absurd than confession.

Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:15 am to AbitaFan08
quote:Are they legally required to report a crime if it has been committed and they were told by a client they they did the crime?
Lawyers are legally required to report a situation where they believe the commitment of a crime is imminent.
Popular
Back to top
