- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Casino to patron: Sorry ma‘am, you didn’t win $43M—there was a slot machine “malfunction”
Posted on 6/16/17 at 10:17 am to upgrayedd
Posted on 6/16/17 at 10:17 am to upgrayedd
quote:
In recent years slot machine manufacturers have changed the "stop" location to other than a jackpot alignment to help prevent the misunderstanding.
fricking idiots.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 10:19 am to tiggerthetooth
quote:
She's not winning shite. The machine was a $6500 machine, she can't sit there and say she truly thought it was possible to win $43 million from a machine that has $6500 emblazoned all over it.
yea, no. She's gonna win this, just not for the full amount. Casino's have insurance for this exact incident, and her attorney knows that.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 10:21 am to cas4t
quote:
Casino's have insurance for this exact incident
this isn't about insurance. this is about violating the state's gaming laws
Posted on 6/16/17 at 10:25 am to Street Hawk
easy solution would be casino to pay out whatever the max money you're able to win from that machine.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 10:25 am to cas4t
quote:
Casino's have insurance for this exact incident, and her attorney knows that.
The casinos do not need insurance for that because the gaming regulations say malfunctions void payouts. Any lawyer who does not know that is a poor attorney.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 10:32 am to PhilipMarlowe
quote:
easy solution would be casino to pay out whatever the max money you're able to win from that machine.
would violate state law and may lead to government sanctions from the regulatory body
Posted on 6/16/17 at 10:34 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
would violate state law and may lead to government sanctions from the regulatory body
Why is everyone ignoring this? Do they think you're lying?
Posted on 6/16/17 at 10:35 am to Festus
i think they're under the false belief that slots are truly random in the long run
Posted on 6/16/17 at 10:38 am to SlowFlowPro
But you've explained that they aren't, several times. I guess people just read the OP and respond directly without reading anything in between.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 10:44 am to Festus
No slot machine will say "printing cash ticket" for any amount over $1200 for jackpots. It'll say "handpay" instead.
This post was edited on 6/16/17 at 10:45 am
Posted on 6/16/17 at 10:53 am to Street Hawk
The selfie doesn't look like someone that just won 43 million dollars. She must be related to Reuben Randle
Posted on 6/16/17 at 11:04 am to Festus
quote:
"I'm just trapped in reality. Once you break away it really opens up your options"
- Doug Polk
Posted on 6/16/17 at 11:29 am to Bmath
quote:
What is the point of a post like this on the third page of a thread?
Math is hard, huh?
Not really sure that getting the page number mixed up has anything to do with math, but the question is still valid.
This post was edited on 6/16/17 at 11:30 am
Posted on 6/16/17 at 11:31 am to Street Hawk
am I the only one who noticed that in each and every one of these "due to a malfunction, we aren't paying off" cases, if the machine cant pay off for a win due to malfunction, then you should get every penny to ever put in that machine because by their own statement, its broken and cant be relied upon to be accurate.
so if they can get away with not paying you for a win, then there should be a full refund to everyone and anyone playing that machine must be given. because if you cant win from a "broken" machine, neither should they be able to profit from it.
so if they can get away with not paying you for a win, then there should be a full refund to everyone and anyone playing that machine must be given. because if you cant win from a "broken" machine, neither should they be able to profit from it.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 11:33 am to Street Hawk
Is it her fault the machine "malfunctioned"? Nope.
Then pay her every fricking penny the machine says she won.
Then pay her every fricking penny the machine says she won.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 11:38 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
it her fault the machine "malfunctioned"? Nope.
Then pay her every fricking penny the machine says she won.
I agree with this because if, unbeknownst to the public, a machine was malfunctioning and not 'paying off', they would keep the money.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 11:49 am to PrivatePublic
quote:
Nobody plays the slots looking for big money. The most I have ever seen one pay out is a few thousand.
Huh? Not sure if serious. Absolutely they play for big money. My niece is a slot host (responsible for paying) and has been for 5÷ years at both in LC.
Most machines pay well over 10k for their own jackpot. If they are tied into a "progressive, if course, the large amount is possible.
Of course this lady will get screwed if she doesn't sue, which she has.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 11:53 am to Funky Tide 8
quote:
question is still valid.
How so? Plenty of people quickly respond to the OP. I've seen 15+ page threads where some of the last comments are directed to posts from the first page and already beaten to death.
It's not even like I posted something obscure. This case was posted a while back, and I was just responding to it after reading the OP and based on what I remembered. I then went back and skimmed the article.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 11:56 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
Then pay her every fricking penny the machine says she won
Lol no. That's not even fair. The play is void. They legally cannot even give her $6500.
It was without a doubt a major machine malfunction.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 12:06 pm to Rouge
Don't these machines have a disclaimer telling the exact amount is maximum? She should definitely get that if so. What they gave her was insulting.
Popular
Back to top



0









