- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Brittney Temple, daughter in law of Collis, has ethics charges brought against her.
Posted on 7/28/26 at 12:55 pm to louisianamotocross
Posted on 7/28/26 at 12:55 pm to louisianamotocross
She was a volleyball coach who got a >$2,000 stipend. This is silly.
Posted on 7/28/26 at 1:00 pm to louisianamotocross
quote:
On a separate note. Brittney is supermodel level attractive.
She's not bad looking but you guys need to quit handing out compliments like this like they’re candy. Chances are slim that she will sleep with a random simp on the internet that said she was attractive.
This post was edited on 7/28/26 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 7/28/26 at 1:00 pm to louisianamotocross
I’m not gonna pretend like I’m a fan of Collis Temple’s slumlord empire, but bringing an ethics charge against his daughter in law for taking a position as a damn volleyball coach is a waste of taxpayer money.
Posted on 7/28/26 at 1:11 pm to CocomoLSU
quote:
There are plenty of state workers who are related or connected in some way, shape, or form, and this seems like a pretty big stretch to contend that the State code of ethics was violated because she coached at the school where her kids go (and her daughter plays too I believe
State ethics laws are fricky to say the least.
But state employees keep their job if a relative gets hired / promoted / appointed over them IF they held the job before that promotion or appointment in question.
She got the job after CT2 was on the board, regardless of her qualifications, which means it qualifies as a violation.
It doesn’t necessarily make realistic sense to block her from the job but that is the way the ethics laws are written.
Posted on 7/28/26 at 1:16 pm to RummelTiger
Im not sure if you were helping the OP by posting a Pic or cleatrly demonstrating his lack of knowledge about " supermodel level cute"...
Posted on 7/28/26 at 1:44 pm to N2cars
quote:
Im not sure if you were helping the OP by posting a Pic or cleatrly demonstrating his lack of knowledge about " supermodel level cute"...
It was a pickle, for sure...
Popular
Back to top


0








