- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Brendan Fraser had a great day yesterday
Posted on 2/2/19 at 12:48 pm to OMLandshark
Posted on 2/2/19 at 12:48 pm to OMLandshark
He looks happy
0
Posted on 2/2/19 at 12:51 pm to Relham10
It makes sense in some circumstances. Say a couple makes a family together and part of the marriage is that a woman forgoes a career to raise the family. Then 20 years later they get a divorce. She sacrificed the ability to develop a career to help build a life for both of them and freed up time for the husband to better build his career. She played a role in what he built in that circumstance, and it's impossible to unravel what is whose.
But if a chick just marries some rich guy after he already made it a little later in life then that argument becomes a little harder to make. Also, the incredible levels of alimony that some of these wealthy pay are just ridiculous regardless of circumstance. It's also just too traditional and outdated for a lot of people. If the woman is perfectly capable of having her own career as is often the case nowadays then it doesn't make much sense either.
But if a chick just marries some rich guy after he already made it a little later in life then that argument becomes a little harder to make. Also, the incredible levels of alimony that some of these wealthy pay are just ridiculous regardless of circumstance. It's also just too traditional and outdated for a lot of people. If the woman is perfectly capable of having her own career as is often the case nowadays then it doesn't make much sense either.
This post was edited on 2/2/19 at 12:53 pm
Posted on 2/2/19 at 12:52 pm to OMLandshark
Divorce reform is desperately needed in this country. The current (and outdated) system is unethical and morally wrong.
Legal theft is all it is.
Legal theft is all it is.
Posted on 2/2/19 at 12:52 pm to lsuwontonwrap
Why do you think he did so many straight the DVD movies
Posted on 2/2/19 at 12:56 pm to brass2mouth
quote:
Surprised he had that much money. He wasn’t in very many movies that I can recall outside of The Mummy.
constant stream of pg13 fun.
Oooh scary.
Net worth 20 million.now.
Doing fine
This post was edited on 2/2/19 at 12:57 pm
Posted on 2/2/19 at 12:58 pm to tiggerthetooth
quote:misleading. Much or most of her money came through husbands dying. Those men prob nagged her into marrying them. She could have had anyone.
Meet Lily Safra, who is worth $1.2 billion obtained through multiple marriages.
Posted on 2/2/19 at 1:06 pm to blueboxer1119
quote:
Worse than Keanu Reeves.
Debatable, but yes. I always thought he was awful at his job.
Posted on 2/2/19 at 1:16 pm to Peazey
That still doesn't make sense. Split the net worth. That is fine. Monthly payments to an adult post marriage should be illegal.
Posted on 2/2/19 at 1:20 pm to AUCE05
And if the worth is not liquid and is in future earnings, how do you split that? Or the wealthier party wants to negotiate future payments rather than giving up current assets then you should take away that ability to negotiate what works for an individual, right?
Posted on 2/2/19 at 1:23 pm to OMLandshark
This piece of pussy was worth $9 million?
Posted on 2/2/19 at 1:46 pm to brass2mouth
quote:
He wasn’t in very many movies that I can recall outside of The Mummy
With Honors was good. And it got a good Cult classic following thanks to Ronald Miller turning into McDreamy.
Posted on 2/2/19 at 1:46 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Wish I would see him in more movies today
Eh..
Posted on 2/2/19 at 2:02 pm to SDTiger15
quote:
Wait...isn’t paying the gold digging skank $50k per month bad?
Jan 31, 2019 he had to pay the skank 50,000 a month for ten years which comes out to 6 million. In other words he is done paying for the skank.
Posted on 2/2/19 at 2:08 pm to lsuwontonwrap
He wasnt in a lot of movies but he was in several big movies that made a pretty decent stack. Thats also back when they would still get cuts off the box office. To this day he still probably gets a royalties check from his biggest movies.
Posted on 2/2/19 at 2:11 pm to OMLandshark
Posted on 2/2/19 at 3:09 pm to Peazey
quote:
And if the worth is not liquid and is in future earnings, how do you split that?
Hulk Hogan's wife asked for all of his future earnings. Why is this a thing since they are no longer married? I get it if she put him through med school.
In this case, she rode along, and just enjoyed the fruit of his labor.
Posted on 2/2/19 at 3:14 pm to OMLandshark
So when he was paying this woman $50k a month. What if during that time he was unable to act anymore and had to work a 9 to 5 job making $70k a year. Would he still have to pay $50k to the ex or does the amount he has to pay her based on a percentage he makes?
Posted on 2/2/19 at 3:52 pm to OMLandshark
Whatever you do, don't google BJ Fraser. Or enable safe search.
Posted on 2/2/19 at 3:53 pm to jimbeam
quote:
I don’t get it
He probably wasn't getting it either once she got the ring
Posted on 2/2/19 at 4:15 pm to blueboxer1119
quote:
Worse than Keanu Reeves.
Impossible
KR is possibly the worst actor and 47 Ronin should have banned him from ever acting again. Bad enough they took a real story and went all FUBAR with it but on top of it he still can not act any better after all these years in the business.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News