Started By
Message

re: Breakthrough in batteries found using aluminum, charges 60x faster w/ higher capacity

Posted on 6/12/21 at 10:21 pm to
Posted by Ripley
Member since Aug 2016
4576 posts
Posted on 6/12/21 at 10:21 pm to

Great news! Already invested in Rio Tinto
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
12108 posts
Posted on 6/12/21 at 11:07 pm to
9 out of 10 of these press releases are of something that doesn't pan out. Companies spends shiite piles of money on brand new plants where the process worked in the lab and at pilot plant but never do at full scale.

I well remember the revolutionary new plant to skip steps in going from bauxite to aluminum metal. Damned thing made shiite tons of fully chlorinated PCBS's, but that never happened in the lab or pilot stages. Alcoa, Palestine, TX
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21445 posts
Posted on 6/12/21 at 11:40 pm to
quote:

Give me a better site linking this.


Forbes
This post was edited on 6/12/21 at 11:40 pm
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
65947 posts
Posted on 6/12/21 at 11:49 pm to
quote:

Look back over time and you will see tons of seemingly simple ideas with common elements and compounds that didn't happen as soon as one would think.


People in Africa and the middle east still use mud and leaves to build homes while they use stones to murder loose women and rival tribes.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
11878 posts
Posted on 6/13/21 at 12:04 am to
quote:

Also, getting 600 miles per charge in an electric car and being able to recharge in 10 minutes is a game changer.

That ain’t happening unless you’re boosting power from a substation.

At those charge speeds, your electrical infrastructure becomes the limiting factor. Charging an 80 kWh battery in 10 minutes, even at 100% charge efficiency, would require a 480 kW load. That’s significantly more than residential transformers are rated for. It would draw 2,000 amps at 240 VAC.

ETA: Just to be clear, even with the current Li-ion car batteries, the limiting factor for residential charging is electrical load. Faster charge times would primarily benefit the smaller batteries in consumer electronics.
This post was edited on 6/13/21 at 12:09 am
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
171944 posts
Posted on 6/13/21 at 12:08 am to
OT in March in response to more electric vehicles by 2030: YoU CaNt DrIvE aCroSs TeXaS iN aN eLeCtRiC vEhIcLe
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
28526 posts
Posted on 6/13/21 at 12:19 am to
quote:

At those charge speeds, your electrical infrastructure becomes the limiting factor. Charging an 80 kWh battery in 10 minutes, even at 100% charge efficiency, would require a 480 kW load. That’s significantly more than residential transformers are rated for. It would draw 2,000 amps at 240 VAC.

ETA: Just to be clear, even with the current Li-ion car batteries, the limiting factor for residential charging is electrical load. Faster charge times would primarily benefit the smaller batteries in consumer electronics.


The residential speed is really not the big issue, the vast majority of residential recharging is done overnight. The Tesla Supercharger 3 is rated at 250kW but they aren't in widespread use yet. You lose about 25% in the charging process the majority of that in rectifying AC to DC.

If/when we have EVs in the 600 mile range if you can get 200 more miles in 20 minutes or so that will cover almost all of the driving needs of all but a tiny percentage of drivers. Also when Interstate driving is basically autonomous even an extra hour to ones 1000 mile trip won't bother most drivers as they will still arrive far fresher than after driving for 13-14 hours.
Posted by RockinDood
Member since Aug 2020
1013 posts
Posted on 6/13/21 at 1:26 am to
Added to my watchlist. Thanks!
Posted by Knight of Old
New Hampshire
Member since Jul 2007
11901 posts
Posted on 6/13/21 at 6:55 am to
Fusion is the answer...
Posted by NPComb
Member since Jan 2019
27772 posts
Posted on 6/13/21 at 7:18 am to
So the Tesla Plaid is already obsolete?
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21445 posts
Posted on 6/13/21 at 7:21 am to
I am thinking Tesla planned on innovation in battery packs and in turn made their batteries modular and replaceable. If anything could be obsolete it would be the battery and not the car.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
17793 posts
Posted on 6/13/21 at 8:35 am to
quote:

being able to recharge in 10 minutes is a game changer.


Yeah, that's not going to happen without high temperature superconductors and significant upgrades to the electrical infrastructure at all levels.
This post was edited on 6/13/21 at 8:35 am
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
21188 posts
Posted on 6/13/21 at 8:36 am to
I can’t wait to see how this turns out in 20 years.
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 6/13/21 at 9:02 am to
quote:

Graphene is a single layer of Carbon atoms. Unless things have changed from my days doing electro-chemistry Graphene is expensive as frick. Like over $100/gram.


Graphene is a new technology. All new technology is expensive initially. They will figure out how to mass produce it cheaper. Cotton was a lot more expensive before the cotton gin.
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
144722 posts
Posted on 6/13/21 at 9:03 am to
quote:

Graphene is expensive as frick.
Like over $100/gram.
you can’t get quality booger sugar for under $100/gram these days
Posted by Privateer 2007
Member since Jan 2020
7282 posts
Posted on 6/13/21 at 9:26 am to
quote:

graphene is a new technology


It's been used in Chemistry and Physics since the 50s or even sooner.

Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 6/13/21 at 9:29 am to
quote:

It's been used in Chemistry and Physics since the 50s or even sooner.


On a small scale. There will eventually be a breakthrough in production
Posted by Privateer 2007
Member since Jan 2020
7282 posts
Posted on 6/13/21 at 9:30 am to
quote:

graphene over $100/g

quote:

can't get quality booger sugar under $100/g these days


I knew I could count on you for the "booger sugar" correlation
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47825 posts
Posted on 6/13/21 at 9:32 am to
quote:

It's been used in Chemistry and Physics since the 50s or even sooner.



I've been hearing about all of its amazing tensile strength and thermal properties for years and years now, and the excitement of the public behind the "wonder material" seems to have waned.

I'm guessing scaling production has been a bitch and a half.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram