- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Border Patrol-involved shooting in Minneapolis; person shot was allegedly armed
Posted on 1/25/26 at 1:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 1/25/26 at 1:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Is that picture from the timeframe of the incident?
Yes.
quote:
Looks like he's in the middle of the street in that picture and nowhere near the sidewalk
People move, you moron.
2
Posted on 1/25/26 at 1:09 pm to AllDayEveryDay
quote:
Crazy leftist lunatic
That’s the funniest shite I’ve read today. Can you tell me how many times I’ve offended you?
This post was edited on 1/25/26 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 1/25/26 at 1:09 pm to chRxis
quote:
i don't think so either... personally, i think the agent that pulled the trigger was not the 1st officer, nor the one that shouted "gun, gun, gun", nor the one that carried his gun away from the situation after disarming him... it was one of the other 3 officers... one of the 7 did it
Which makes the legal analysis super complicated
Posted on 1/25/26 at 1:10 pm to Clames
quote:
People move, you moron.
. In the video at the beginning, he is literally in the middle of the road directing traffic.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 1:10 pm to Antonio Moss
It didn’t help that there couldn’t be any crime scene investigation due to the unsafe nature of the area once it happened. Local law enforcement couldn’t get there to protect evidence.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 1:11 pm to TDTOM
Barnes v. Felix:
Supreme Court struck down the "moment-of-threat" rule. Previously, some courts only looked at the exact second a shot was fired or a mask was worn.
The New Standard: Now, courts must look at the "totality of the circumstances" leading up to the event.
Supreme Court struck down the "moment-of-threat" rule. Previously, some courts only looked at the exact second a shot was fired or a mask was worn.
The New Standard: Now, courts must look at the "totality of the circumstances" leading up to the event.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 1:12 pm to Clames
quote:
No, that's not my opinion at all.
ok, so what is your opinion on the matter then... my question was an opportunity for you to explain... so, again, i'm giving you an opportunity to explain it, as you see it
quote:
He was also not carrying his permit, which makes him unlawfully CCW'ing according to local statutes. So he essentially removed his legal authority by his own negligence.
i agree with this... but i do stand on the opinion that had the confrontation never happened, no one, including you and I, would have known Pretti was CCW that day, permit on him at the time or not...
quote:
Wrong for him to CCW AND confront law enforcement in the course of their duties
the "confrontation" came after the LEO pushed the lady... he wasn't there looking for a fight, but the LEOs definitely made sure a fight was brought to him...
it's a shame, all the way around... it really is... we have become so calloused that even something like this just gets boiled down to D vs. R...
Posted on 1/25/26 at 1:12 pm to TDTOM
quote:
In the video at the beginning, he is literally in the middle of the road directing traffic.
But that doesn’t mean he was actively impeding when he was maced.
It appears from the video that he retreated to the sidewalk for a substantial period of time before the first agent approached the woman.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 1:13 pm to ell_13
quote:
Local law enforcement couldn’t get there to protect evidence.
Yeah, well such are the consequences when your state government adopts a policy of lawlessness.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 1:14 pm to chRxis
quote:Thes low IQ protesters need to stay out of the streets then they wouldn't have to be pushed back like the lady and this guy. It is not their right to block the streets and try to prevent federal agents from doing their job. Get in their way and you can expect to get pushed out of their way. If the clowns in Minneapolis city and Minnesota state government would do their jobs none of this would be happening
and if the LEO doesn't push the woman, he's still alive
This post was edited on 1/25/26 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 1/25/26 at 1:14 pm to Clames
quote:
People move, you moron.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. When does he move from the middle of the street?
Where are the 2 women with the blue on their heads?
Posted on 1/25/26 at 1:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
He was in the street prior to this video. There is video of it.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 1:16 pm to Classy Doge
quote:
It is not their right to block the streets
The woman who was pushed was on the sidewalk
Posted on 1/25/26 at 1:16 pm to pankReb
quote:
you post this as if it's relevant whatsoever.
So now being in the street doesnt matter.
You see how easy it is to prove how every talking point you bring up is dumb as shite? Stick to melting over your shitty fb program
Posted on 1/25/26 at 1:17 pm to billjamin
quote:
Listen son, one day you’ll realize that you need to care about your rights and it matters.
Deflecting
quote:
When you move out of your parents house it’ll hit different
Attacking is a form of deflecting.
quote:
Until then, let me know how that boot tastes.
See above.
Should be noted that I never expressed my stance on this subject. I’m just calling out the idiocy of what is being posted here.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 1:17 pm to HailToTheChiz
quote:
He was in the street prior to this video. There is video of it.
Specifically not relevant to my question.
My question
quote:
Is that picture from the timeframe of the incident?
The answer is apparently "No"
Posted on 1/25/26 at 1:17 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
But that doesn’t mean he was actively impeding when he was maced.
Correct. It was the fact that he put himself between the officer and the woman that meant he was impeding. My comment was in reference to the other poster who said people move.
quote:
It appears from the video that he retreated to the sidewalk for a substantial period of time before the first agent approached the woman.
That it does, Edward. That it does, indeed.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 1:18 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
Which makes the legal analysis super complicated
without question... but i do feel like someone is going to get away with murder here
Posted on 1/25/26 at 1:19 pm to pankReb
quote:
Should be noted that I never expressed my stance on this subject.
Also you
quote:
confronting law enforcement while carrying out operations is absolutely illegal.
fricking idiot.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 1:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The answer is apparently "No"
Apparently it's not a "no" because you are intentionally being vague about timeframe. The sidewalk is in the background of that photo.
I was responding to your other post about how he was in the street more, even before that photo
Page 117 of 158
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News