- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 2/4/14 at 9:50 pm to Roger Klarvin
To give you a literal answer, God knew there would be a period of "enlightenment" with man. The big bang theory is biblical.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 9:50 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Guesses and suppositions. There's no evidence, no support, that the complexity and variety of life is in any way related to bacteria becoming resistant to antibiotics, using your example.
quote:
That is at the very core of evolution. It's the same mechanism
Yes, that's the claim, but no support for the claim that this very core of (Darwinian) evolution proves or offers evidence that an elephant and pine tree have a common ancestor.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 9:51 pm to Roger Klarvin
The Jews are Gods chosen people. Might as well start to learn the language 
Posted on 2/4/14 at 9:52 pm to BigEdLSU
quote:
Watch a Schroeder lecture, science fits the Bible like a hand and a glove.
This.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 9:54 pm to BigEdLSU
Posted on 2/4/14 at 9:56 pm to beejon
quote:
Yes, that's the claim, but no support for the claim that this very core of (Darwinian) evolution proves or offers evidence that an elephant and pine tree have a common ancestor.
Why do you believe there is no evidence that a pine tree and an elephant have a common ancestor? I only ask because, actually, there is.
Pine trees and elephants are composed of the same nucleic acids, the same enzymes, many of the same biological mechanisms, the same organelles, etc. On a cellular level, there is plenty of evidence.
However, I know none of that means anything to you. You actually want to see a plant become an animal in a matter of generations.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 9:56 pm to beejon
I have a question. I remember a story in the news about a week ago regarding a star explosion that was caught on camera. The star is positioned several million light years away.
If we were able to observe an event that took several million years for the light to reach our eyes, how is the universe only 6000 years old?
If we were able to observe an event that took several million years for the light to reach our eyes, how is the universe only 6000 years old?
Posted on 2/4/14 at 9:57 pm to beejon
quote:
Yes, that's the claim, but no support for the claim that this very core of (Darwinian) evolution proves or offers evidence that an elephant and pine tree have a common ancestor.
Granted, I know this will go completely over your head and its a moot point, but I hope this will help educate at least some posters.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 9:58 pm to BigEdLSU
quote:
The Jews are Gods chosen people. Might as well start to learn the language
And the billions of people throughout human history who have never so much as heard of a hew, the bible or the Judeo-Christian God?
Posted on 2/4/14 at 9:58 pm to LSU Fan SLU Grad
quote:
If we were able to observe an event that took several million years for the light to reach our eyes, how is the universe only 6000 years old?
Scientists are wrong, God made the stars only appear that they were that far away, when in reality they're about the distance from NOLA to BR.
Or at least thats what I got from that Ham guy.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 9:58 pm to LSU Fan SLU Grad
quote:
I have a question. I remember a story in the news about a week ago regarding a star explosion that was caught on camera. The star is positioned several million light years away.
If we were able to observe an event that took several million years for the light to reach our eyes, how is the universe only 6000 years old?
Because the guy who invented the MRI machine is a Young Earth Creationist.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:00 pm to REG861
quote:
Because the guy who invented the MRI machine is a Young Earth Creationist.
can't argue with that
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:08 pm to mattloc
quote:
Ther are over 100 billion observable galaxies.... either you believe they were created, or that they appeared from nothing. One seems no more ridiculous than the other scientifically speaking
Reading through this thread, and found this gem. Scientifically speaking, if something that exists has to have been created by something else, then what created God?
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:10 pm to brass2mouth
Y'all really should google science of God youtube
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:11 pm to beejon
quote:
Exactly! They're all faith based beliefs.
no they are not....faith is belief on bad evidence or no evidence at all. The science behind the Theory of Evolution and all the inferences, assumptions we make are based on good evidence backed up by a century of expermentation and discovery.
herein lies the difference
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:15 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
faith is belief on bad evidence or no evidence at all
Nah. That depends on what your faith is in. My faith is in God creating everything however he chose to do so.
Which means if he chose to use a Big Bang and evolution, then fine - who cares.
That's one of the reasons I really don't like it when Christians paint themselves into a corner with this whole evolution vs creation thing.
When you do that, you're putting God into the box of your own understanding. Kinda silly. God can do whatever he wants, whenever he wants, however he wants to do it... and I don't really think it's that important (or even our job) to try and figure out.
This post was edited on 2/4/14 at 10:16 pm
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:16 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
God can do whatever he wants, whenever he wants, however he wants to do it... and I don't really think it's that important (or even our job) to try and figure out
he couldnt defeat a tribe with iron chariots, actually He caught a beatdown.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:17 pm to Cruiserhog
Faith is a matter of belief with no evidence. Science requires evidence and a refusal to believe. You can use science to strengthen your faith but faith will never strengthen a scientific argument.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 10:18 pm to RIPMachoMan
quote:
Reading through this thread, and found this gem. Scientifically speaking, if something that exists has to have been created by something else, then what created God?
He did not say that for something to exist it must be created. ??? He said it was either created or always existed. And to take either view, God or not, requires a "leap of faith" as you have no evidence to support it.
Page 16 of 31
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News