- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ascension Parish Planning Commission Denies New Subdivision
Posted on 7/6/26 at 9:43 pm to RemyLeBeau
Posted on 7/6/26 at 9:43 pm to RemyLeBeau
You must be close friends with Jeffery Nolan or you are him. This is a plat that meets the ULDC and planning staff and an engineering review agency agree the plat meets every aspect of the code. Just because you own a home in an existing subdivision doesn’t mean that no subdivision is allowed to come near you.
2
Posted on 7/7/26 at 4:30 am to lsutiger266
quote:
You must be close friends with Jeffery Nolan or you are him. This is a plat that meets the ULDC and planning staff and an engineering review agency agree the plat meets every aspect of the code. Just because you own a home in an existing subdivision doesn’t mean that no subdivision is allowed to come near you.
Everything I posted was taken from the video.
But instead of a rebuttal to the points made, we get a low IQ, angry, response.
It never crossed your mind that I don't want another subdivision because what once was an ok drive to work is borderline miserable now and adding hundreds of additional vehicles isn't going to make it better?
Posted on 7/7/26 at 5:36 am to lsualum01
quote:
But obviously you’re an engineer and you are smarter than everyone else
He’s an engineer from LSU so take that for what it’s worth.
Posted on 7/7/26 at 6:16 am to lsutiger266
Well if I bought my home because I like a certain area (the way it is) and we have a mechanism for public input on the changing of that area then yes. That’s exactly what it means.
More traffic, more flooding, more whatever the frick.
More traffic, more flooding, more whatever the frick.
Posted on 7/7/26 at 7:02 am to Cuz413
Good!
Posted on 7/7/26 at 7:34 am to Cuz413
quote:
Who in the Ap government ensures that a developer adheres to the UDC? And who is responsible when a negative consequence happens to existing neighbors because of the development?
Lance Brock, he’s been overseeing it since AP adopted the UDC some 20plus years ago. He got embarrassed at that soccer field hearing. Honestly the whole parish government got embarrassed.
Posted on 7/7/26 at 10:24 am to LSUJML
quote:
If it’s anything like what happened in Denham they will keep coming back & one by one the council members will vote in their favor
As they fricking should!
Posted on 7/7/26 at 10:26 am to StrikeIndicator
quote:
since AP adopted the UDC some 20plus years ago
Your probably thinking of the Master Plan, not the UDC.
Ironically, the Parish Council just tried to remove the Master Plan from the UDC. Before the UDC the MP was more of guidelines, the UDC is the law. Which now makes the MP the law and not a suggestion.
Why would they want to remove something that is an added layer of restrictions?
Posted on 7/7/26 at 10:30 am to sqerty
quote:
How bout bigger lots instead of cramped future housing projects?
Ok I'll play.
1. What size lot do you suggest?
2. What size lot do you currently own?
Posted on 7/7/26 at 10:38 am to TaderSalad
quote:
I'd be interested in having his financials audited. you know he's crooked as a Home Depot 2x4.
quote:
TaderSalad
You are real dumb frick
Posted on 7/7/26 at 10:50 am to Hangit
quote:
The two owners are neighbors, residing in Bocage.
So they do not live in AP? Got it.
Posted on 7/7/26 at 11:10 am to yakster
quote:
How about Dantin Bruce? Where does he live? Many subdivision developers don’t even live in Louisiana much less in AP.
My God, Google them so you don't sound like a complete dumb frick.
They are a highly respected development company located on Bluebonnet Blvd Baton Rouge LA 70810. The entire company lives in EBR Parish and Ascension Parish in the heart of the State of Louisiana.
This post was edited on 7/7/26 at 11:13 am
Posted on 7/7/26 at 12:55 pm to Cuz413
Good. We full up.
Posted on 7/8/26 at 10:08 pm to RemyLeBeau
Approved, as it should have been the first time it was presented since it met all requirements of the ordinance.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 12:19 am to LSUengr
Anytime one of these things gets initially denied people get all excited not understanding it’s basically just a delay. Cant stop these builders as best I can tell. I just can’t understand where all these buyers are coming from!
Posted on 7/9/26 at 7:11 am to BeerMoney
Considering damn near half the roads in AP are state owned, sounds like they need to start ponying up some money for infrastructure improvements.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 8:01 am to SoggyCerealClub
Just means a new. "Older" subdivision will flood or some people who have lived here 50+ years with no threat of flooding will flood for the first time.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:12 am to bamaswallows
quote:
The Staff wrote the UDC (development code).
The staff meets with the developer well before the submittal, and instructs the developer on what they need to be in compliance with UDC. They charge the developer for this meeting.
quote:
There are no backroom deals. Everything is there for understanding and compliance. The staff is very helpful, but they follow the UDC to the letter
Generally speaking, the public and average homeowner, has zero understanding and very uneducated to what it takes to get a development approved, built and 100% completed. A developer, with millions of dollars at risk, will ALWAYS meet and speak with the Planning Commission to make sure he is in complaisance with the UDC to insure approval.
Were there any public meetings held by developer to educate the public and answer any questions / concerns?
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:20 am to Purple Spoon
quote:
More traffic, more flooding, more whatever the frick.
Exactly. No concern can the City/Parish meet the infrastructure needs etc. The developers are largely carpet baggers with no long-term skin in the game. People are wise to start asking questions. The process is purposefully vague and shady. Just put a sign up on a property for some zoning or project. Hard to get documents for review. When it is time to question by stakeholders/citizens it is too late by design.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:31 am to Supermoto Tiger
quote:
Were there any public meetings held by developer to educate the public and answer any questions / concerns?
No reason in this day and age better documentation couldn't be uploaded online of the entire process prior to any approvals by Planning & Zoning / Council. They don't want to have public meetings or review.
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News