re: As WWL turns; NOPD gets warrant for Seth Dunlap’s phone

What a cokcsucker

quote:

---

You think tmobile already gave them an IP? How did they narrow it down to his phone. Then, they already sent a warrant to Twitter to match that IP with that post?

---

Ok we were talking two different things. I was misunderstanding you essentially. I thought you were saying that the cops wouldn't be able to find out the IP if he had WiFi on.

I assume you are saying the only way wwl investigator was able to identify it was Seth was he used the wwl wifi to post the tweet.

If that is the case then it wouldn't have been the IP that identified him though. All traffic on that wifi would have the same IP. Could be the article is written wrong and more than likely the case.

Now that I am thinking hard about it, I dunno how wwl would have found a true IP. Twitter wouldn't turn it over I don't think and they didn't have a court order. So you are prolly right. Wasn't the IP though, simply able to match the device that sent that data package at that time over their WiFi.

What a fricking idiot though to use their WiFi to send that. More than likely was hooked to it using his sign in for the network. What an idiot.

Yeah obviously if he used their wifi there are more options depending on the firewall. If they have content monitoring turned on it doesn't take a "foresnic" expert to read a report that says it resolves his phone host name to a website. "Seth's Iphone"

Just interesting they are going to the telco after claiming to have wrapped this up.

internal investigation and conclusions Bunchie.

quote:

---

You have no idea how this works, do you?

---

explain it to me.

quote:

---

C’mon down to da Silva slippa....

---

*twangy guitar plays in the background*

quote:

---

explain it to me.

---

So if he didn't log in on the company wifi, then he logged in through his cell provider. He claimed he doesn't have access to the company twitter, so it means that even with a successful logon, he triggered an alert.

For example, whenever I get a new device an alert is sent to my registered email asking me if I accessed my account from "device X", on an IP located "at Y". Since by his own admission this would have been his first logon attempt, the webmaster could get an alert of the exact deets from a successful login, as to specific time, specific device, specific IP in corresponding timeframe to that tweet.

However, the popo still has to have their own conclusive data to determine guilt. So a subpoena would ask if "device X" is registered to "person A" through his telco acct? And did "device X" show activity at a specific time, while accessing a specific IP location?

If telco matches the registered device to him, as well as activity on the already identified IP to him, during the matching date stamp provided by the webmaster … Game, set, match. Extortion charges incoming.

So happy that hes going down


Faking hate crimes should be equal to an actual hate crime.

I hope Seth does prison time and they let Will Wade frick Seth up the arse with a 10 inch dildo. frick that dude ! Talks shite and stuff.

I had to read it a few times to make sure it was saying will wade.