- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anthropic just studied which jobs AI can be theoretically replaced.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 11:56 am to forkedintheroad
Posted on 3/6/26 at 11:56 am to forkedintheroad
quote:
If the AI does your work, it's not being pitched for you to use and check.
It's being pitched for your boss to replace you with.
In the architecture and engineering fields (minus computer engineering) the boss is not going to place liability on AI when a design fails. The boss want's a human to take responsibility.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 11:56 am to forkedintheroad
quote:
It's being pitched for your boss to replace you with.
What if I'm the boss?
Posted on 3/6/26 at 11:56 am to Sun God
quote:
I’m guessing you’re a retirement age engineer with a PE
ETA: near retirement age.
This post was edited on 3/6/26 at 11:58 am
Posted on 3/6/26 at 11:57 am to olemc999
quote:
Grounds Maintenance finna eat!
They barely afford to eat now. Wait until the market is flooded with unemployed, white collar employees.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 11:58 am to GumboPot
"engineer" covers everyone from software engineers to field commissioning engineers. Obviously one is more readily replaceable than the other.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 11:58 am to GumboPot
The business/finance side I think it is over-estimating. Sure there are absolutely areas that it will be able to play a very large role, but there is so much gray area when it actually comes to business accounting and finance that I think AI will still be very limited in what it can do. Hell, ERP systems can't even handle the variables and are constantly having to be worked around to accomodate things. Simple tasks like some a/p input or billing can be automated a lot for sure. Analytic positions absolutely will be hit hard eventually.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 11:58 am to boxcarbarney
quote:
What if I'm the boss?
AI company says it can replace 80% of bosses.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 12:01 pm to High C
quote:
I’m loving the look of “legal” there. The less lawyers, the better.
Everyone will be a lawyer.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 12:03 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
"engineer" covers everyone from software engineers to field commissioning engineers. Obviously one is more readily replaceable than the other.
Not for long honestly unless you’re talking about true field guys
Posted on 3/6/26 at 12:04 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
engineer" covers everyone from software engineers to field commissioning engineers. Obviously one is more readily replaceable than the other.
I built some web content over the years but too lazy/busy to bake in the ever changing world of Section 508/ADA/WCAG compliance because it's such a pain in the arse and we always lack the time and budget to do it.
On a whim I asked it to look over the site and add a very specific level of compliance to it: WCAG 2.1 level AA.
Yeah it was that easy. This is the kind of "plumbing" that tech people need to look out for. There are certain things that it can just make happen in seconds you'd craft a project plan for and hire a an entire team to do.
This post was edited on 3/6/26 at 12:06 pm
Posted on 3/6/26 at 12:06 pm to High C
quote:
I’m loving the look of “legal” there. The less lawyers, the better.

Posted on 3/6/26 at 12:07 pm to GumboPot
quote:
In the architecture and engineering fields (minus computer engineering) the boss is not going to place liability on AI when a design fails. The boss want's a human to take responsibility.
LOL
In what system now does a single person assume liability for a company design?
Posted on 3/6/26 at 12:07 pm to GumboPot
One thing I've wondered about is what happens if AI screws something up (which it frequently does), then what? Using lawyers as an example, if your lawyer screws something up, you can go after his malpractice insurance. If AI screws up, you're just holding the bag, right? I guess a new insurance product would evolve for such a thing, but still a pretty big risk at the moment to completely trust AI.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 12:08 pm to GumboPot
Ah, the slave class as we will call them
Pretty much all the jobs middle class Americans don't want to do because it is cheaper to hire laborers. Not really surprising.
Pretty much all the jobs middle class Americans don't want to do because it is cheaper to hire laborers. Not really surprising.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 12:09 pm to forkedintheroad
quote:
In what system now does a single person assume liability for a company design?
Your question does not follow.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 12:09 pm to AllbyMyRelf
quote:
As a lawyer, I see huge potential for AI in the legal field
True.
quote:
but right now, even the most sophisticated AI tools designed for attorneys are lacking.
VERY true.
quote:
I see inexplicable misses by AI in transaction documents that I have analyzed.
Same. I've tested several platforms (including those made specifically for lawyers) and they're currently operating around the level of a very junior paralegal when it comes to tasks like redlining based on playbooks I've created.
I'm sure they'll get better very quickly, but right now they're not replacing anyone.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 12:10 pm to boxcarbarney
I drew an extremely rudimentary floor plan onsite of our duplex.
Nearly illegible writing/numbering and loose doodles for the sink, appliances, tub, vanity, etc. Really just for me to understand as I was planning to transfer the info to a real floor plan ( I used to be an architectural draftsman).
The wife (no pics) got bored during the ride home and snapped a pic of my drawing and ran it through ChatGPT with a few statements regarding the property.
Fricking ChatGPT asked questions to verify the location of the rooms and then spit out a very comprehensive drawing in less than 15 seconds.
This was from a cell phone in the middle of the desert on I-40.
Nearly illegible writing/numbering and loose doodles for the sink, appliances, tub, vanity, etc. Really just for me to understand as I was planning to transfer the info to a real floor plan ( I used to be an architectural draftsman).
The wife (no pics) got bored during the ride home and snapped a pic of my drawing and ran it through ChatGPT with a few statements regarding the property.
Fricking ChatGPT asked questions to verify the location of the rooms and then spit out a very comprehensive drawing in less than 15 seconds.
This was from a cell phone in the middle of the desert on I-40.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 12:11 pm to Neauxla_Tiger
quote:
One thing I've wondered about is what happens if AI screws something up (which it frequently does), then what? Using lawyers as an example, if your lawyer screws something up, you can go after his malpractice insurance. If AI screws up, you're just holding the bag, right? I guess a new insurance product would evolve for such a thing, but still a pretty big risk at the moment to completely trust AI.
AI design engineer would be liable for the screw up and AI lawyers can sue each other and the winner gets paid out in AI crypto currency.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 12:11 pm to GumboPot
Alright I'll spell it out for you:
"Hey man, we need your design for so and so widget. Nobody is going to review your design and if it fails, the liability is on you. Good luck"
Youre trying to say nobody will put AI in that scenario.
I'm saying that scenario doesn't exist.
"Hey man, we need your design for so and so widget. Nobody is going to review your design and if it fails, the liability is on you. Good luck"
Youre trying to say nobody will put AI in that scenario.
I'm saying that scenario doesn't exist.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 12:13 pm to forkedintheroad
quote:
Alright I'll spell it out for you:
"Hey man, we need your design for so and so widget. Nobody is going to review your design and if it fails, the liability is on you. Good luck"
Youre trying to say nobody will put AI in that scenario.
I'm saying that scenario doesn't exist.
I think we are in agreement. That's why I was confused by your question.
Popular
Back to top


2







