- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Another Vote in Favor of Circumcision
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:24 am to jlovel7
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:24 am to jlovel7
quote:
Reddit thinks circumcision is forced mutilation and shouldn’t happen.
All I need to know that its probably a good idea.
You know who else thinks it is a good idea? The entire Muslim world.
Most Christians are not circumcised. Americans are the lone exception.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:28 am to soccerfüt
quote:
Unfortunately, for the rest of the world, most of your fellow Aggies feel this way about every cock.

Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:45 am to shutterspeed
If you need a disgusting retard to make you feel better about having a piece of your dick removed, I’m not sure what to tell you. And I say that as someone who was circumcised 
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:54 am to SallysHuman
quote:
It's also a dirty dick problem, look up balanitis

Posted on 4/30/26 at 9:07 am to shutterspeed
God designs you. Religion corrects the design. Kinda like a product recall.
Obedient or conceited man…?
Obedient or conceited man…?
This post was edited on 4/30/26 at 9:15 am
Posted on 4/30/26 at 9:19 am to Dragula
quote:
And provides endless opportunity for chicks to get grossed out
I've been in enough of these threads on this board to know that tllotot are not grossed out by a natural peen.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 9:25 am to LemmyLives
quote:
Circumcision reduces transmission of HIV and other diseases. Even before the WHO and the UN were totally corrupted by COVID, that was accepted.
Also, not screwing other men reduces HIV transmission.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 9:28 am to SallysHuman
quote:
I've been in enough of these threads on this board to know that tllotot are not grossed out by a natural peen.
Says the uncut guys...
I work in medical surrounded by women who see naked men daily and they always snicker and say how gross it it is to see and touch it to put in a Foley. Not very professional, but that's young women.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 9:29 am to BK Lounge
quote:
As a guy who was circumcised as an infant- i agree that the practice is barbaric .
Good buddy of mine is Italian, first generation off the boat and grew up in NOLA.. he was uncut, and he told me he was self-conscious about how it looked, so elected to get circumsized in his 20s .. he said sex before getting all his nerve endings chopped off was 50x better than after the procedure.. i think most of us who were cut as babies just dont know what we’re missing .
It makes sense since theyre literally lopping off like a million nerve endings that are in the foreskin.. who gives a frick how it looks ?
Aquinas actually listed that as a "pro" for circumcision:
quote:
First, because it was a sign of that faith whereby Abraham believed that Christ would be born of his seed. Secondly, because it was to be a remedy against original sin, which is contracted through the act of generation. Thirdly, because it was ordained as a remedy for carnal concupiscence, which thrives principally in those members, by reason of the abundance of venereal pleasure. (ST III.70.3.ad1)
Basically, sex feels too good naturally, so by circumcising men, they will have less sexual pleasure and won't be as lustful.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 9:40 am to Joshjrn
Logical
Unless the starting point is one’s human design (by God). God, by His design of man, enabled sex to feel that good.
How does Aquinas reconcile God’s design and circumcision?
Ignoring, improving…arrogant?
Unless the starting point is one’s human design (by God). God, by His design of man, enabled sex to feel that good.
How does Aquinas reconcile God’s design and circumcision?
Ignoring, improving…arrogant?
Posted on 4/30/26 at 9:47 am to shutterspeed
quote:
While there’s no clear cause of penile cancer, the Moffitt Cancer Center says some experts think tumors can form “when bodily fluids become trapped within the foreskin,” which helps to explain why uncircumcised men are thought to have higher risk.
This is not a very persuasive argument for circumcision.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 10:06 am to Everyday Is Saturday
quote:
Logical
Unless the starting point is one’s human design (by God). God, by His design of man, enabled sex to feel that good.
How does Aquinas reconcile God’s design and circumcision?
Ignoring, improving…arrogant?
I don't know offhand, but if I were to venture a guess, Yahweh's original design was intended for the prelapsarian paradigm, but after the fall, Yahweh modified that design to compensate for/punish "excessive" carnal desires.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 10:29 am to shutterspeed
This guy would be a damn fine worker.
The ole saying “if his dick fell off today he’d show up to work tomorrow.” applies to this dude.
The ole saying “if his dick fell off today he’d show up to work tomorrow.” applies to this dude.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 11:40 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
Basically, sex feels too good naturally, so by circumcising men, they will have less sexual pleasure and won't be as lustful.
Well hallelujah, at least we can agree that sex is most probably much, much better with intact foreskin.. of course most of us who were circumsized as babies will never know .
Now- are you agreeing that this is a “pro” for circumsicion ? Or are you simply stating facts ? Because anyone who argues that sex shouldnt feel *too* good because religion, is in fact a special type of deranged individual .
Posted on 5/1/26 at 8:03 am to BK Lounge
quote:
Now- are you agreeing that this is a “pro” for circumsicion ? Or are you simply stating facts ? Because anyone who argues that sex shouldnt feel *too* good because religion, is in fact a special type of deranged individual .
No, I’m not agreeing with it. Was simply stating his position
Popular
Back to top


0









