Started By
Message

re: Alton Sterling shooting - discussion thread

Posted on 7/6/16 at 10:38 am to
Posted by Lucky_Dog
Member since May 2016
785 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 10:38 am to
quote:

Yea, I don't think we should live in fear of the police.

As long as you do what they ask you have no reason to be scared.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84424 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 10:39 am to
quote:

Yeah, people get such a fair shake in court



Well, they do have Judy White.

And, we can't help someone who is dead.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86039 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 10:39 am to
quote:

As long as you do what they ask you have no reason to be scared.


do y'all carry this belief to all forms of government?
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52088 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 10:39 am to
quote:

I see what you're saying. Why not just comply?


The guy was looking at serious jail time with an arrest, if the reports are to be believed. To go in assuming he would just comply is how cops end up getting killed.

It's situations like this that help me understand why police officers react to potentially deadly situations the way that they do. Sometimes it may be way over the top, but other times it saves their lives.


ETA: Not to mention they were informed the suspect had a weapon and I'm sure were given a description of what he was wearing. They were on edge from the moment they pulled up, and understandably so when dealing with a suspect they believe is armed.
This post was edited on 7/6/16 at 10:42 am
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
72147 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 10:40 am to
Which I do. But if I don't, I shouldn't fear for my life. The police aren't God.

I understand the difference here is that he had a gun, though, which changes everything.
Posted by munchman
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
10371 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 10:40 am to
Maybe the police should stop going into these high crime areas and let the hood rats work it out for themselves.
Maybe go in and give them guns so they can meet out the type of justice they want. Then they won't have cops to blame anymore.
Posted by bayourougebengal
Member since Mar 2008
7236 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 10:40 am to
quote:

Taking him to the ground in that fashion with the location of the gun on his body still unknown seems like an unnecessarily dangerous move. I'm not sure what SOP is in that situation, but I'd be surprised if this was it.


I don't totally disagree with this, but I'll counter that it may have been the right move to make. It wasn't in his hand yet, so talking him down could neutralize the threat of him pulling it. Apparently he still tried but that's hindsight.
Posted by Lucky_Dog
Member since May 2016
785 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 10:40 am to
quote:

do y'all carry this belief to all forms of government?

Do you think people resisting arrest is a good choice? Do what they ask and if they are wrong fight it in court. How the hell does fighting a police officer make any damn sense?
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
72147 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 10:41 am to
Cops already avoid the hood unless they have to

Can't say I blame them
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34717 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 10:41 am to
quote:

Taking him to the ground in that fashion with the location of the gun on his body still unknown seems like an unnecessarily dangerous move. I'm not sure what SOP is in that situation, but I'd be surprised if this was it.



What option do they have? Ask him to pull the gun out of his pocket at which point he is a fraction of a second from being able to kill them?

Taking him down and controlling his hands is probably the best option. As for trying to get to the gun first, that's a bad idea, because then you have a gun that then creates a struggle for a loaded gun. The idea is to get him on the ground with the gun still in his pocket, get him cuffed, then remove the gun.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
178768 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 10:41 am to
quote:

I mean yea, if you have a gun on you, you better comply. But out of self interest. Not because you know those mother frickers are ruthless, like the one poster implied.


well a cops threat is only going to hold water if they are actually legally able to backup their threats when you have people in a tussle match on the ground with guns involved. Zero Tolerance. Sorry about your luck.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86039 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 10:41 am to
quote:

Do you think people resisting arrest is a good choice?


no
This post was edited on 7/6/16 at 10:42 am
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91836 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 10:42 am to
quote:

Do we know how long the confrontation lasted before he tackled him? I assume the started by asking him to remain calm, drop down on the ground or put his hands on his head. IF they knew, or even had reason to believe he had a gun, and if he wasn't complying with their verbal commands (which it appears he wasn't) then attempting to tackle him to the ground and cuff him may have been the best and most reasonable course of action at the time. They got him to the ground, they just were not able to cuff him quick enough.


I also wonder why they rolled him on his back after the takedown? The officer in the front had his knee on Sterling's head/neck and had him on his side next to the car. I can see the pros and cons of his back and his stomach, but again, I wonder what the standard operating procedure is in that situation.

quote:

The alternative is to keep giving him verbal commands until he either complies, takes off running, or reaches in his pocket.



If he hasn't brandished the weapon yet I sort of liken this to a high speed chase - perhaps the best course of action is the one that keeps the situation as mild as possible. You certainly cannot let him escape, but as I said earlier, the take down took things from 0 to 100 instantly. It is plausible that was the right call, but I believe it is worth discussing and learning from going forward.
Posted by Rollo
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
435 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 10:42 am to
the good news is we now know at least one type of gun "owner" that the left supports- the illegally possessing felon who resists police and reaches for his gun in an effort to escape.

Good to know
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89066 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 10:42 am to
quote:

but this kind of attitude is what leads to the "comply or die" issues


The frick it is. This pos should have complied. There is no fricking question.
quote:

People shouldn't comply out of fear of deadly force from an officer for being disobedient.


This guy didn't die from some hot head cops.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130023 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 10:42 am to
So what am I missing in all this? Why is this controversial?

I'm really failing to see the issue with this case.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
72147 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 10:43 am to
It doesn't make sense but it doesn't mean you should fear that you will be killed.

And as I've said before, I think this shooting is justified and the cops will get off and rightfully so.

My point is that non compliance doesn't necessarily mean you should fear for your life. Sometimes someone with mental health problems isn't going to comply. Or someone with too much to drink. Or someone on drugs. Non compliance =\= deadly force.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86039 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 10:43 am to
quote:

What option do they have? Ask him to pull the gun out of his pocket at which point he is a fraction of a second from being able to kill them?



almost every instance where we see cops confronting someone with a gun, this is exactly what they do

they have guns drawn on the guy and are yelling for him to drop the gun

if he turns the gun, they shoot

so we need to make up our minds if they knew he had a gun or didn't
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34717 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 10:43 am to
quote:

I also wonder why they rolled him on his back after the takedown? The officer in the front had his knee on Sterling's head/neck and had him on his side next to the car. I can see the pros and cons of his back and his stomach, but again, I wonder what the standard operating procedure is in that situation.


I doubt they rolled him onto his back. In that situation, they are trying to get him on his stomach, hands behind his back. I'm sure he was trying to get off of his stomach.

quote:

If he hasn't brandished the weapon yet I sort of liken this to a high speed chase - perhaps the best course of action is the one that keeps the situation as mild as possible. You certainly cannot let him escape, but as I said earlier, the take down took things from 0 to 100 instantly. It is plausible that was the right call, but I believe it is worth discussing and learning from going forward.


They may very well have done that. The only video we have seen starts well into the exchange.
This post was edited on 7/6/16 at 10:44 am
Posted by musick
the internet
Member since Dec 2008
26131 posts
Posted on 7/6/16 at 10:43 am to
I just wish we didnt have two threads on the same issue, one disguised as a "RIOT" Thread when no riots have taken place. It's annoying to have to keep jumping in and out of both threads.

Jump to page
Page First 49 50 51 52 53 ... 168
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 51 of 168Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram