- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Alleged video of Ahmaud Arbery shooting leaks
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:58 pm to The Pirate King
Posted on 5/7/20 at 12:58 pm to The Pirate King
quote:
Yeah the priors are pretty irrelevant in this case.
Does the prior arrest somehow mean that the guy wasn't blocked off and shot by a civilian that admittedly didn't witness him commit a crime?
If they're in possession of evidence that he committed a crime then they should divulge it. Otherwise they're toast.
This post was edited on 5/7/20 at 1:00 pm
3
Posted on 5/7/20 at 1:00 pm to Goldrush25
If people are trying to comment on character Id love to know what they can dig up on these wannabe cops who killed this young man. Probably can’t because of their connections to people in town.
This post was edited on 5/7/20 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 5/7/20 at 1:02 pm to Salmon
quote:
if 1 person got some facts wrong this morning, so be it, but don't act like the 911 calls are some new information that the majority of the thread have ignored
I mean, there was literally another person a page or two ago asking Chicken about whether they called the police or not. But OK, man. Sorry I'm not following a Tigerdroppings thread as closely as you are. You and the rest of the anons in here clearly have it all figured out. Congrats? 
Posted on 5/7/20 at 1:03 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
Maybe. I think Georgia has a citizen’s arrest statute though.
Posted on 5/7/20 at 1:05 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
Does the prior arrest somehow mean that the guy wasn't blocked off and shot by a civilian that admittedly didn't witness him commit a crime?
More to the point, the McMichaels clearly didn't know about his prior.
It's not like you can argue that the McMichaels would have thought he was more dangerous due to the prior they didn't know about.
You also can't argue it means Arbery is more likely to have acted in a violent way. You can see how he acted on the video. You don't need the prior to guess how he was acting.
You also can't argue the prior makes it more likely he had a gun the day he died. He didn't have one and we know that for sure.
Other than making Arbery look bad, what does the prior add?
Posted on 5/7/20 at 1:07 pm to Rep520
Yeah. The only thing relevant is what they reasonably knew at the time.
Posted on 5/7/20 at 1:08 pm to Diseasefreeforall
Can someone tell me which page the racists come in and this thread gets good
Posted on 5/7/20 at 1:09 pm to ell_13
Did they say they saw him at a construction site or something? Hell of a reason to kill a man...
Posted on 5/7/20 at 1:12 pm to JumpingTheShark
Most of their views are assumptions and not based on anything they “knew” 100%.
Posted on 5/7/20 at 1:14 pm to JumpingTheShark
quote:
Did they say they saw him at a construction site or something? Hell of a reason to kill a man...
They didn't even see him. They allegedly saw him on a video the neighbor provided. And Arbery's family could only confirm that one of the videos (from the day he died) was him. They don't even have confirmed video of him stealing the fishing gear that went missing several days before. They just assumed it was him.
This post was edited on 5/7/20 at 1:14 pm
Posted on 5/7/20 at 1:29 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I think the problem is that few facts are known here, regardless of position.
The one fact that's clear is that the initial police report is mostly fiction.
Posted on 5/7/20 at 1:30 pm to Diseasefreeforall
Guy was a known burglar in the neighborhood. They confront him with guns. He tries to grab one of their guns instead of asking why they're chasing him. He gone.
Posted on 5/7/20 at 1:49 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
If they're in possession of evidence that he committed a crime then they should divulge it. Otherwise they're toast.
Don’t think it matters if they have evidence that he committed a crime at this point. They are toast either way.
Posted on 5/7/20 at 1:54 pm to TigersSEC2010
quote:
I - by default - do not believe anything Talcum X says until it's proven by a legitimate source. He has a 99.9% failure rate.
I am in the exact same boat. This looks horrible and hope these guys get what they deserve, but my first instinct is to disregard anything that piece of shite says. He does far more harm than good for black advocacy now.
Posted on 5/7/20 at 1:54 pm to Mootsman
[/quote]
Link?
You think it's wise to stop and ask questions after being shot at?
quote:
Guy was a known burglar in the neighborhood.
Link?
quote:FIFY
They chase him down in a vehicle with guns.
quote:
He tries to grab one of their guns instead of asking why they're chasing him
You think it's wise to stop and ask questions after being shot at?
quote:FIFY
He murdered.
This post was edited on 5/7/20 at 1:55 pm
Posted on 5/7/20 at 1:59 pm to Mootsman
quote:
Guy was a known burglar in the neighborhood. They confront him with guns. He tries to grab one of their guns instead of asking why they're chasing him. He gone.
quote:
Mootsman
Hi Dylann
Posted on 5/7/20 at 2:01 pm to The Pirate King
quote:
I present facts to support my views
Fact: An unarmed man was shot following an encounter with two armed people.
Fact: The shooters claim to have been attempting a citizen's arrest.
Fact: The two men, through their own statements, did not meet the legal standard to perform a citizen's arrest.
How you like them facts?
From those facts what we have is at minimum a felony murder through an attempted kidnapping, or at worst a capital murder (not sure about the degrees under GA law, but likely what would be first degree).
Posted on 5/7/20 at 2:02 pm to REG861
Found out more info.
McMichael is a former investigator for the DA office. Glynn County DA office recused themselves because he used to work there. A neighboring county DA took the case, then realized McMichael had worked for that DA office as well. He recused his office. A third DA took over the case and has empaneled a grand jury this week.
McMichael is a former investigator for the DA office. Glynn County DA office recused themselves because he used to work there. A neighboring county DA took the case, then realized McMichael had worked for that DA office as well. He recused his office. A third DA took over the case and has empaneled a grand jury this week.
Posted on 5/7/20 at 2:03 pm to Mootsman
quote:
Guy was a known burglar in the neighborhood
You got a link for this or are you just making shite up.
Posted on 5/7/20 at 2:03 pm to lionward2014
quote:
Fact: The two men, through their own statements, did not meet the legal standard to perform a citizen's arrest.
You don't possess the authority to make a legal determination.
Page 50 of 58
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News