Started By
Message

re: Alabama governor signs law banning puberty blockers, gender transition surgeries

Posted on 4/11/22 at 11:57 am to
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77270 posts
Posted on 4/11/22 at 11:57 am to
quote:

Cole Beer
Another groomer on tigerdroppings.

Why are there so many on here?
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
75186 posts
Posted on 4/11/22 at 11:57 am to
quote:

We’ve already decided we are leaving this backwards state once my daughter graduates Hugh school

Posted by threedog79
Member since Sep 2013
3857 posts
Posted on 4/11/22 at 11:58 am to
We in Alabama may be slow but we are like an old school John Deere tractor...run slow but have a lot of torque.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87381 posts
Posted on 4/11/22 at 11:58 am to
quote:

Not really as I don’t expect much from our states lawmakers. We’ve already decided we are leaving this backwards state once my daughter graduates Hugh school, so I don’t even really follow state politics as closely as I used to.



All due respect to Spleen, who I like personally

But this sounds like it's working. He needs to move somewhere that suits his policy positions and where he can enjoy (or not) the fruits of those beliefs.

Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
24248 posts
Posted on 4/11/22 at 11:59 am to
quote:

Republicans love it when the government tells us what we can or cannot do with our own bodies.

How many cases are not their own bodies? How many nutjob parents are pushing their kids to a specific gender identity?
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
37071 posts
Posted on 4/11/22 at 11:59 am to
quote:

intentionally hateful towards children without taking any time to try and understand the issue at hand.


How specifically is it hateful?

And some would say this law is being done for the good of the kids...it gives them until the age of 19 to try and understand the issue at hand.

Another question...should kids of any age be able to get a tattoo? Drink? Go to war? Buy cigarettes? Drive a car?

If your answer to any of those is no, then why not? You will then understand why this law makes sense.
This post was edited on 4/11/22 at 12:01 pm
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77270 posts
Posted on 4/11/22 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

No, I think it’s backwards to pass a law that is intentionally hateful towards children without taking any time to try and understand the issue at hand.
Ok, groomer.

I think it is intentionally hateful towards children to castrate and sterilize them, but apparently we won’t agree on that.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
75186 posts
Posted on 4/11/22 at 12:02 pm to
tSpleen wants mentally ill parents to be able to do irreparable harm to their children who can't even be trusted to pick out their own clothes by themselves.

Hell, my young cousin just spent the better part of three months trying to convince everyone he was a lizard. I guess we should have glued some scales on the little shite.
This post was edited on 4/11/22 at 12:04 pm
Posted by Malik Agar
Member since Nov 2012
12076 posts
Posted on 4/11/22 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

No, I think it’s backwards to pass a law that is intentionally hateful towards children without taking any time to try and understand the issue at hand.

100% NAMBLA talking point
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
19499 posts
Posted on 4/11/22 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

No, I think it’s backwards to pass a law that is intentionally hateful towards children without taking any time to try and understand the issue at hand


How exactly is this hateful towards children? I'm genuinely curious
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
134659 posts
Posted on 4/11/22 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

No, I think it’s backwards to pass a law that is intentionally hateful towards children



You are a vile, disgusting pedo enabler.

You know what’s hateful towards children? Allowing warped ideologies that tell them they were born wrong and need to permanently mutilate and destroy their bodies, giving them no chance at a normal adulthood, or being able to properly have kids, to give some progscum the chance to virtue signal.



Teenagers are DUMB. They make awful decisions daily. If you allow them to be groomed and militate and alter themselves, you increase the Chances they off themselves and get buried with the name and genetics they were born with and will always have.


You people are evil. I hope you go somewhere far and away, and any decent people your ilk try to settle around chase your pro-kiddy-diddling arse out of town on a rail.

Fie and damn ye!
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
66950 posts
Posted on 4/11/22 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

hateful towards children

What is specifically hateful?
You're pushing to allow teachers, etc to groom your kids to be transgender, without parental knowledge, then you want those kids to be physically altered all without parental knowledge.
So, parents are responsible for their kids, but teachers and the government is responsible for the child's sexual orientation?

No thanks. Go move to the Left Coast which encourages "community" teaching of your kids' values, while they discourage or try to cancel your influence and teachings of your own children.
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
24248 posts
Posted on 4/11/22 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

And some would say this law is being done for the good of the kids...it gives them until the age of 19 to try and understand the issue at hand.

Yeah, Heaven forbid we make these people be adults before making dramatic, life-altering decisions. We know teens are so good at decision making. Or worse, as I've already mentioned, wait and make sure this is a decision actually being made by the person and not being forced or swayed by a looney parent.

So hateful...
This post was edited on 4/11/22 at 12:08 pm
Posted by Tigerbait357
Member since Jun 2011
71123 posts
Posted on 4/11/22 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

Republicans love it when the government tells us what we can or cannot do with our own bodies.


Children shouldn’t be getting sex transition surgeries. If you want to do all that as an adult, go for it. Until then it shouldn’t be allowed until they are adults and reached an appropriate level of maturity before making life changing decisions like this. You already can’t smoke or drink until 21 but think it’s okay for kids to do this?
This post was edited on 4/11/22 at 12:13 pm
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
134659 posts
Posted on 4/11/22 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

How exactly is this hateful towards children? I


Spleen and his progscum friends hate it because it makes it harder to corrupt kids to the point they can be easily molested
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
108046 posts
Posted on 4/11/22 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey on Friday signed legislation to outlaw puberty blocking medications for minors.

The bill makes it a felony, punishable by up to 10 years in prison, to prescribe puberty blockers or hormones to transgender people under age 19 to help in their gender transition. 


As long as there's a clearly defined way to determine whether it's for transitioning or whether it's for a legitimate medical condition, I'm ok with this (I haven't read the direct language in the bill so it may specify). Those are decisions that are too big to make at such a young age while still developing IMO.

quote:

ALABAMA JOINS FLORIDA IN PROHIBITING CERTAIN SCHOOL TEACHERS FROM DISCUSSING GENDER, SEXUAL MATTERS


This I have mixed emotions about. Only because when you talk about consent in sex ed for younger kids, gender is going to come up and is a "sexual matter".

Living in a state that is #5 in child abuse, I think teaching young kids about consent and how to identify inappropriate touching is important. I know there's the prevailing thought that it should be left to the family in ages K-3, but the problem is the majority of child molesters molest children in their family.
This post was edited on 4/11/22 at 12:18 pm
Posted by HouseMom
Member since Jun 2020
1933 posts
Posted on 4/11/22 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

intentionally hateful towards children without taking any time to try and understand the issue at hand.


Hateful? No. Understand what issue? There is nothing to understand. Gender dysphoria is a real thing, but no amount of bodily mutilation and medication can change a male to a female and vice versa.

It's not possible, and a lot of people are making bank trying to convince mentally ill people that it's doable if only they do x, y, and z.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65870 posts
Posted on 4/11/22 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

I'm generally against gov't involvement between doctors and patients and even more so between parents and children. While I think most would agree that forcibly changing a child's gender through powerful drugs and/or surgery is bad, there are a million plus other decisions that could potentially as bad or worse that the gov't doesn't currently involve themselves in.


What is described here is child abuse. We do not allow doctors or parents to abuse children. Why would this situation be any different?
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
24248 posts
Posted on 4/11/22 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

100% NAMBLA talking point

I couldn't remember what NAMBLA stood for so I just googled.

...holy frick, I always thought it was just a meme or something. I had no idea it was/is a very real organization defending the rights of pedophiles.
Posted by Vamos Brandonos
Member since Mar 2022
1021 posts
Posted on 4/11/22 at 12:28 pm to
Well this certainly doesn't jive with having a state funded tranny school just outside Birmingham.

Make up your mind gumps.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram