- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Airfix P61 Black Widow - Build and Review
Posted on 7/26/26 at 7:56 am
Posted on 7/26/26 at 7:56 am
This kit begins with crew members that are not even scale to each other. The midget pilot has to be up front to clear the canopy design. His controls are almost bigger than him. Controls for the second pilot are absurdly large as well. Pathetic design by Airfix.
The exploded assembly instructions FAIL to include that this model will need at least 25 grams of nose weight. This important detail is left out of the instructions! I had to add weight to the canopy floor. Weight could have been easily added inside the giant nose cone but I had already sealed it to the fuselage before I realized that the thing was completely tail heavy. Airfix are bastards for not including this important detail.
Ok we get going and there are glaring fit issues. The two tail parts where they meet the canopy had giant gaps that I had to fill with putty and then sand. Again, poor design but I managed to salvage the build.
Prepped for paint, decals and weathering:
In the end the build came out ok but was a complete pain in the arse. The decals were the best thing about this kit.
3/10 kit.
Terrible design, fit issues galore, clear canopy parts marked with random blemishes from the factory moulds. Crazy amounts of extraneous flashing on every single part.
I would not recommend anyone building this piece of crap kit.
Catch yall on the next one.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 7:58 am to One72
If it was so shitty from the get go, why did you spend the time and effort to finish it?
Posted on 7/26/26 at 8:00 am to UptownJoeBrown
I’m hardheaded. Or persistent. Perspective is everything.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 8:18 am to One72
airfix is shite in my experience with them, nice job working with what you had though
Posted on 7/26/26 at 8:21 am to geauxtigers87
quote:
airfix is shite in my experience with them, nice job working with what you had though
Thanks.
I’ll stay away from Airfix for a while.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 8:25 am to One72
It may have been a crappy kit but you did an amazing job building it.
That is a sharp build. I am really not familiar with this plane, what was the rear crew members job? Did he operate the gun or was he the bombardier?
That is a sharp build. I am really not familiar with this plane, what was the rear crew members job? Did he operate the gun or was he the bombardier?
Posted on 7/26/26 at 8:32 am to UptownJoeBrown
quote:on brand for this troll not to have the ability to work through challenges and create something great anyway.
it was so shitty from the get go, why did you spend the time and effort to finish it?
Good job. OP.
This post was edited on 7/26/26 at 8:33 am
Posted on 7/26/26 at 8:51 am to RTM4
Rear crew member was navigator and also radar.
Big radar in nose cone. Advanced radar for the period.
Big radar in nose cone. Advanced radar for the period.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 9:19 am to One72
Cool build
I have a few! I usually do Warhammer kits, but my kids have been getting more and more curious every time I get one out. They’re both 6, so a little too uncoordinated for glue. Gunpla is a little safer in that regard, but only the boy can keep the attention span.
I found these at Hobby Lobby, and the girl has fallen in love with building them.
These are Pokemon Quick Kits. It’s push off the Sprue quality and they push together on pegs. The Quick kits don’t have much in the way of pose-ability like the regular kits, but they make for a great office decoration (coworkers each have one now) and are like $10-15 each.
My other recommendation is more in line with Gunpla. Also had the fortune of buying and building a Zoids Shield Liger. Similar vein of not needing glue, a few of the pieces have a tough fit. However, unlike Gunpla, which has a tendency (for me at least) to not stay together when posing, this thing is very solidly built, and has survived 24 hour contact with the “enemy”. Definitely interested in picking up more.

quote:
I would not recommend anyone building this piece of crap kit.
I have a few! I usually do Warhammer kits, but my kids have been getting more and more curious every time I get one out. They’re both 6, so a little too uncoordinated for glue. Gunpla is a little safer in that regard, but only the boy can keep the attention span.
I found these at Hobby Lobby, and the girl has fallen in love with building them.
These are Pokemon Quick Kits. It’s push off the Sprue quality and they push together on pegs. The Quick kits don’t have much in the way of pose-ability like the regular kits, but they make for a great office decoration (coworkers each have one now) and are like $10-15 each.
My other recommendation is more in line with Gunpla. Also had the fortune of buying and building a Zoids Shield Liger. Similar vein of not needing glue, a few of the pieces have a tough fit. However, unlike Gunpla, which has a tendency (for me at least) to not stay together when posing, this thing is very solidly built, and has survived 24 hour contact with the “enemy”. Definitely interested in picking up more.

Posted on 7/26/26 at 9:27 am to One72
Nice work putting that together.

Posted on 7/26/26 at 9:56 am to GoldenGuy
Badass to get your children involved.
The closest I’ve gotten to anime/fantasy builds are the ‘egg’ planes that I’ve built. Hasegawa, mostly.
They look like toys but were all long builds:
ADD:
The closest I’ve gotten to anime/fantasy builds are the ‘egg’ planes that I’ve built. Hasegawa, mostly.
They look like toys but were all long builds:
ADD:
This post was edited on 7/26/26 at 10:10 am
Posted on 7/26/26 at 11:37 am to One72
The OP said second pilot but that was actually the gunner's position. Early in production, the radar operator used that position and the planes were deployed without a gunner because there was no top turret due to a shortage of parts and priority given to B-29's.
This would be a later version with the top turret and a gunner, radar operator in the rear.
The box the model came in shows them doing ground attack. I don't know if they were ever used for that. They were night fighters and used in the day towards the end of the war because of their radar.
This would be a later version with the top turret and a gunner, radar operator in the rear.
The box the model came in shows them doing ground attack. I don't know if they were ever used for that. They were night fighters and used in the day towards the end of the war because of their radar.
Popular
Back to top
5








